51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Visual Acuity Results in Preschool Children with Lea Symbols and Bailey-Lovie E Chart

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          To compare visual acuity with two visual acuity charts in preschool children.

          Materials and Methods:

          Visual acuity measurement with Lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie tumbling E chart was performed on children between 3 and 6 years of age. Visual acuity data from the two charts were analyzed with Bland-Altman plot to determine the limits of agreement. The Wilcoxon signed test was performed in children aged 3-4 years and in children aged 5-6 years separately to evaluate the influence of age. The inter-eye difference between the two charts were further analyzed with the paired t-test. A p value > 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

          Results:

          A total of 47 children were enrolled for the study. The average logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) monocular visual acuity with Lea symbols (0.17 ± 0.13) was better than the Bailey-Lovie tumbling E chart (0.22 ± 0.14). The mean difference between Bailey-Lovie tumbling E chart and Lea symbol chart was 0.05 ± 0.12 in logMAR units. A second analysis eliminating outliers showed the same result but lower differences ( n = 43, 0.05 ± 0.05 logMAR units). Visual acuity results between the two charts in children aged 3-4 years showed a significant difference ( p = 0.000), but not for children aged 5-6 years ( p = 0.059). Inter-eye differences between the two charts was not statistically significant ( p = 0.77).

          Conclusion:

          Bailey-Lovie tumbling E chart is comparable to the Lea symbols chart in pre-school children. But preference should be given to Lea symbols for children aged 3-4 years as the symbols are more familiar than a directional test for this age group.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New visual acuity test for pre-school children.

          A new test chart was developed for the measurement of visual acuity of pre-school children. The symbols of the test are circle, square, apple and house. These were so designed that each symbol measures visual acuity similarly. This feature of the test was verified experimentally. The visual acuity values measured by the individual symbols correlated highly with the visual acuity values measured with the whole test (0.82-0.86). The correlation between the visual acuity values measured repeatedly, the reliability of the new test, was found to be 0.94 for adult subjects. The new visual acuity test thus fulfils the statistical criteria of a good visual acuity test. Because both children and nurses seem to like the new test, it may be useful in the assessment of visual acuity in pre-school children.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            New design principles for visual acuity letter charts.

            This paper intoduces new principles for the design and use of letter charts for the measurement of visual acuity. It is advocated that the test task should be essentially the same at each size level on the chart. Such standardization of the test task requires the use of letters of equal legibility, the same number of letters on each row, and uniform between-letter and between-row spacing. It is also advocated that, combined with the test task standardization, there should be a logarithmic progression of letter size. Charts incorporating these design features have been made. These charts facilitate the use of nonstandard testing distances which might be used when there is low visual acuity, when examination room layout prevents testing at the standard distance, or when it is necessary to validate visual acuity scores or detect malingering. Adjusting the visual acuity score according to the chosen testing distance is simplified by the use of logarithmic scaling.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Visual acuity norms in pre-school children: the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

              To provide population-based normative data for monocular visual acuity (VA) and interocular differences in VA (IOD) in Black and Hispanic children 30 to 72 months of age without visually significant refractive errors or ophthalmic abnormalities. In a population-based cohort of children in the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study, monocular HOTV VA measurements using the Amblyopia Treatment Study protocol were analyzed using continuous and dichotomous outcomes for VA and IOD, after excluding subjects with ophthalmic abnormalities or refractive error. The analysis cohort consisted of 1722 Black and Hispanic children aged 30 to 72 months. Mean logMAR VA improved with age (p < 0.0001) and male gender (p = 0.0008). The proportion of children achieving VA 20/40 or better was associated with age (p < 0.0001), but not ethnicity or gender, and was 81, 94, 99, and virtually 100% in children aged 30 to 35, 36 to 47, 48 to 59, and 60 to 72 months of age, respectively. The most stringent VA threshold that excluded <5% of normal children was 20/63, 20/50, 20/32, and 20/32 for children aged 30 to 35, 36 to 47, 48 to 59, and 60 to 72 months, respectively. Children attending preschool or daycare achieved VA 20/32 more often than those not attending, after age adjustment (p = 0.01), as did children from higher-income families (p = 0.04). There was no association between mean absolute IOD and age (p = 0.45), ethnicity (p = 0.12), or gender (p = 0.19). The proportion of children with an IOD of 0 to 1 lines was higher in males than females (p = 0.02); it did not vary by age (p = 0.06) or ethnicity (p = 0.17). An IOD of 2 or more lines occurred in 6% of normal children. VA test performance in normal pre-school children improves with age. We propose new age-specific thresholds for defining abnormal monocular VA using HOTV optotypes in children between 2 and 5 years of age, for use in screening, clinical practice, and research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol
                Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol
                MEAJO
                Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0974-9233
                0975-1599
                Oct-Dec 2013
                : 20
                : 4
                : 345-348
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University, Karnataka, India
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Mr. Nijil Sanker, Assistant Professor, Department of Optometry, 3rd floor, A.H.S building, Manipal College of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal - 576 104, Udupi district, Karnataka State, India. E-mail: nijilsanker@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                MEAJO-20-345
                10.4103/0974-9233.120020
                3841955
                24339687
                d34155cf-15b0-4865-9b26-bb5e1ed8bbea
                Copyright: © Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                visual acuity,bailey-lovie tumbling e chart,lea symbols
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                visual acuity, bailey-lovie tumbling e chart, lea symbols

                Comments

                Comment on this article