1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community-based participatory research application of an artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram for cardiovascular disease screening: A FAITH! Trial ancillary study

      brief-report
      a , b , c , d , a , a , e , a , a , f , g , a , h , *
      American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
      Elsevier
      Artificial intelligence, Electrocardiogram, Disparities, Race, ADI, Area Deprivation Index, AHA, American Heart Association, CBPR, community-based participatory research, CVD, cardiovascular disease, CVH, cardiovascular health, FAITH!, Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health!, LS7, Life's Simple 7, LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction, mHealth, mobile health, SDOH, Social determinants of health, TTE, transthoracic echocardiogram

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based health interventions, systemic racism remains a concern as these advancements are frequently developed without race-specific data analysis or validation. To evaluate the potential utility of an AI-based cardiovascular diseases (CVD) screening tool in an under-resourced African-American cohort, we reviewed the AI-enhanced electrocardiogram (ECG) data of participants enrolled in a community-based clinical trial as a proof-of-concept ancillary study for community-based screening.

          Methods

          Enrollees completed cardiovascular testing including standard 12-lead ECG and a limited echocardiogram (TTE). All ECGs were analyzed using previously published institution-based AI algorithms. AI-ECG predictions were generated for age, sex, and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Diagnostic accuracy of the AI-ECG for decreased LVEF and sex was quantified using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Correlation between actual age and AI-ECG predicted age was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients.

          Results

          Fifty-four participants completed both an ECG and TTE (mean age 55 years [range 31-87 years]; 66.7% female). All participants were in sinus rhythm, and the median LVEF of the cohort was 60-65%. The AI-ECG for decreased LVEF demonstrated excellent performance with an AUC of 0.892 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.708-1); sensitivity=50% (95% CI 9.5-90.5%; n=1/2) and specificity=96% (95% CI 86.8-98.9%; n=49/51). The AI-ECG for participant sex demonstrated similar performance with AUC of 0.944 (95% CI 0.891-0.998); sensitivity=100% (95% CI 82.4-100.0%; n=18/18) and specificity=77.8% (95% CI 61.9-88.3%; n=28/36). The AI-ECG predicted mean age was 55 years (range 26.9-72.6 years) with a strong correlation to actual age (R=0.769; p<0.001).

          Conclusion

          Our analyses of previously developed AI-ECG algorithms for prediction of age, sex, and decreased LVEF demonstrated reliable performance in this community-based, African-American cohort. This novel, community-centric delivery of AI could provide valuable screening resources and appropriate referrals for early detection of highly-morbid CVD for under-resourced patient populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

          Background: The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). Methods: The American Heart Association, through its Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update. The 2022 Statistical Update is the product of a full year’s worth of effort by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. This year’s edition includes data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population and an enhanced focus on social determinants of health, adverse pregnancy outcomes, vascular contributions to brain health, and the global burden of cardiovascular disease and healthy life expectancy. Results: Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics. Conclusions: The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram

              Asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction (ALVD) is present in 3-6% of the general population, is associated with reduced quality of life and longevity, and is treatable when found1-4. An inexpensive, noninvasive screening tool for ALVD in the doctor's office is not available. We tested the hypothesis that application of artificial intelligence (AI) to the electrocardiogram (ECG), a routine method of measuring the heart's electrical activity, could identify ALVD. Using paired 12-lead ECG and echocardiogram data, including the left ventricular ejection fraction (a measure of contractile function), from 44,959 patients at the Mayo Clinic, we trained a convolutional neural network to identify patients with ventricular dysfunction, defined as ejection fraction ≤35%, using the ECG data alone. When tested on an independent set of 52,870 patients, the network model yielded values for the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.93, 86.3%, 85.7%, and 85.7%, respectively. In patients without ventricular dysfunction, those with a positive AI screen were at 4 times the risk (hazard ratio, 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 3.3 to 5.0) of developing future ventricular dysfunction compared with those with a negative screen. Application of AI to the ECG-a ubiquitous, low-cost test-permits the ECG to serve as a powerful screening tool in asymptomatic individuals to identify ALVD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Am J Prev Cardiol
                Am J Prev Cardiol
                American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
                Elsevier
                2666-6677
                13 November 2022
                December 2022
                13 November 2022
                : 12
                : 100431
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
                [b ]Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
                [c ]Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
                [d ]Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
                [e ]Hue-Man Partnership, Minneapolis, MN, USA
                [f ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
                [g ]Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
                [h ]Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Cardiovascular Disease, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. brewer.laprincess@ 123456mayo.edu
                Article
                S2666-6677(22)00115-5 100431
                10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100431
                9677088
                36419480
                ce47b797-abb7-4a40-aea9-552d3d6e80da
                © 2022 Mayo Clinic. Published by Elsevier B.V.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 September 2022
                : 12 November 2022
                Categories
                Short Report

                artificial intelligence,electrocardiogram,disparities,race,adi, area deprivation index,aha, american heart association,cbpr, community-based participatory research,cvd, cardiovascular disease,cvh, cardiovascular health,faith!, fostering african-american improvement in total health!,ls7, life's simple 7,lvef, left ventricular ejection fraction,mhealth, mobile health,sdoh, social determinants of health,tte, transthoracic echocardiogram

                Comments

                Comment on this article