17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      "Seeing" the Difference: The Importance of Visibility and Action as a Mark of "Authenticity" in Co-production : Comment on "Collaboration and Co-production of Knowledge in Healthcare: Opportunities and Challenges"

      article-commentary

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Rycroft-Malone paper states that co-production relies on ‘authentic’ collaboration as a context for action. Our commentary supports and extends this assertion. We suggest that ‘authentic’ co-production involves processes where participants can ‘see’ the difference that they have made within the project and beyond. We provide examples including: the use of design in health projects which seek to address power issues and make contributions visible through iteration and prototyping; and the development of ‘actionable outputs’ from research that are the physical embodiment of co-production. Finally, we highlight the elements of the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) architecture that enables the inclusion of such collaborative techniques that demonstrate visible co-production. We reinforce the notion that maintaining collaboration requires time, flexible resources, blurring of knowledge producer-user boundaries, and leaders who promote epistemological tolerance and methodological exploration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          What is Organizational Knowledge?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Boundary Objects, Social Meanings and the Success of New Technologies

            Nick Fox (2011)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Is it worth engaging in multi-stakeholder health services research collaborations? Reflections on key benefits, challenges and enabling mechanisms.

              Multi-Stakeholder Health Services Research Collaborations (M-SHSRCs) are increasingly pursued internationally to undertake complex implementation research that aims to directly improve the organisation and delivery of health care. Yet the empirical evidence supporting M-SHSRCs' capacity to achieve such goals is limited, and significant impediments to effective implementation are identified in the literature. This dichotomy raises the question, 'is it worth engaging in M-SHSRCs?' In this paper, we contribute to the narrative evidence-base by outlining key issues emerging from our substantial collaborative experience in Australia. Key benefits, challenges and mechanisms that may enable effective implementation of M-SHSRCs in other contexts are highlighted. We conclude that M-SHSRCs are worthwhile and succeed through significant financial, temporal and emotional investments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                Kerman University of Medical Sciences
                Int J Health Policy Manag
                International Journal of Health Policy and Management
                Kerman University of Medical Sciences
                2322-5939
                June 2017
                17 October 2016
                : 6
                : 6
                : 345-348
                Affiliations
                1NIHR Collaboration and Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Yorkshire and Humber (CLAHRC YH), Sheffield, UK.
                2Lab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
                3Translating Knowledge Into Action, NIHR CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber, Sheffield, UK.
                4Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, Doncaster, UK.
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence to: Jo Cooke jo.cooke@ 123456sth.nhs.uk
                Article
                10.15171/ijhpm.2016.136
                5458796
                28812827
                ce33a5fd-959f-4b99-b03e-aa36451c2253
                © 2017 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 August 2016
                : 04 October 2016
                Page count
                References: 30, Pages: 4
                Categories
                Commentary

                co-production,knowledge mobilisation,design approaches in healthcare,research impact,actionable tools

                Comments

                Comment on this article