10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Functional Outcome Prediction in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using a Fused Imaging and Clinical Deep Learning Model

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND:

          Predicting long-term clinical outcome based on the early acute ischemic stroke information is valuable for prognostication, resource management, clinical trials, and patient expectations. Current methods require subjective decisions about which imaging features to assess and may require time-consuming postprocessing. This study’s goal was to predict ordinal 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in acute ischemic stroke patients by fusing a Deep Learning model of diffusion-weighted imaging images and clinical information from the acute period.

          METHODS:

          A total of 640 acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging within 1 to 7 days poststroke and had 90-day mRS follow-up data were randomly divided into 70% (n=448) for model training, 15% (n=96) for validation, and 15% (n=96) for internal testing. Additionally, external testing on a cohort from Lausanne University Hospital (n=280) was performed to further evaluate model generalization. Accuracy for ordinal mRS, accuracy within ±1 mRS category, mean absolute prediction error, and determination of unfavorable outcome (mRS score >2) were evaluated for clinical only, imaging only, and 2 fused clinical-imaging models.

          RESULTS:

          The fused models demonstrated superior performance in predicting ordinal mRS score and unfavorable outcome in both internal and external test cohorts when compared with the clinical and imaging models. For the internal test cohort, the top fused model had the highest area under the curve of 0.92 for unfavorable outcome prediction and the lowest mean absolute error (0.96 [95% CI, 0.77–1.16]), with the highest proportion of mRS score predictions within ±1 category (79% [95% CI, 71%–88%]). On the external Lausanne University Hospital cohort, the best fused model had an area under the curve of 0.90 for unfavorable outcome prediction and outperformed other models with an mean absolute error of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.79–1.01), and the highest percentage of mRS score predictions within ±1 category (83% [95% CI, 78%–87%]).

          CONCLUSIONS:

          A Deep Learning-based imaging model fused with clinical variables can be used to predict 90-day stroke outcome with reduced subjectivity and user burden.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct

            The effect of endovascular thrombectomy that is performed more than 6 hours after the onset of ischemic stroke is uncertain. Patients with a clinical deficit that is disproportionately severe relative to the infarct volume may benefit from late thrombectomy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Stacked generalization

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Stroke
                Stroke
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0039-2499
                1524-4628
                September 2023
                September 2023
                : 54
                : 9
                : 2316-2327
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology (Y.L., Y.Y., J.O., B.J., S.O., G.Z.)
                [2 ]Department of Electrical Engineering (J.O.), Stanford University, CA.
                [3 ]National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, United Kingdom (G.Y.).
                [4 ]Department of Neuroradiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston (M.W.).
                [5 ]Neurology Service, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland (P.M.).
                [6 ]Department of Neurology, UCLA, CA (D.S.L.).
                [7 ]Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (M.G.L., G.W.A.).
                Article
                10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044072
                c9cc3442-7f1b-4e58-99d5-8c77a62505ad
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article