8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Indigenous Peoples’ evaluation of health risks when facing mandatory evacuation for birth during the COVID-19 pandemic: an indigenous feminist analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Indigenous Peoples living on the land known as Canada are comprised of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people and because of the Government of Canada’s mandatory evacuation policy, those living in rural and remote regions of Ontario are required to travel to urban, tertiary care centres to give birth. When evaluating the risk of travelling for birth, Indigenous Peoples understand, evaluate, and conceptualise health risks differently than Eurocentric biomedical models of health. Also, the global COVID-19 pandemic changed how people perceived risks to their health. Our research goal was to better understand how Indigenous parturients living in rural and remote communities conceptualised the risks associated with evacuation for birth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Methods

          To achieve this goal, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 parturients who travelled for birth during the pandemic and with 5 family members of those who were evacuated for birth.

          Results

          Participants conceptualised evacuation for birth as riskier during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified how the pandemic exacerbated existing risks of travelling for birth. In fact, Indigenous parturients noted the increased risk of contracting COVID-19 when travelling to urban centres for perinatal care, the impact of public health restrictions on increased isolation from family and community, the emotional impact of fear during the pandemic, and the decreased availability of quality healthcare.

          Conclusions

          Using Indigenous Feminist Methodology and Indigenous Feminist Theory, we critically analysed how mandatory evacuation for birth functions as a colonial tool and how conceptualizations of risk empowered Indigenous Peoples to make decisions that reduced risks to their health during the pandemic. With the results of this study, policy makers and governments can better understand how Indigenous Peoples conceptualise risks related to evacuation for birth before and during the pandemic, and prioritise further consultation with Indigenous Peoples to collaborate in the delivery of the health and care they need and desire.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-024-11489-9.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outcome of Coronavirus spectrum infections (SARS, MERS, COVID 1 -19) during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

            Objective The aim of this systematic review was to report pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of Coronavirus (CoV) spectrum infections, and particularly COVID-19 disease due to SARS-COV-2 infection during pregnancy. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched electronically utilizing combinations of word variants for “coronavirus” or “severe acute respiratory syndrome” or “SARS” or “Middle East respiratory syndrome” or “MERS” or “COVID-19” and “pregnancy”. The search and selection criteria were restricted to English language. Study eligibility criteria Inclusion criteria were pregnant women with a confirmed Coronavirus related illness, defined as either SARS, MERS or COVID-19. Study appraisal and synthesis methods We used meta-analyses of proportions to combine data and reported pooled proportions. The pregnancy outcomes observed included miscarriage, preterm birth, pre-eclampsia, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, fetal growth restriction, and mode of delivery. The perinatal outcomes observed were fetal distress, Apgar score 90% of whom also had pneumonia, PTB is the most common adverse pregnancy outcome. Miscarriage, preeclampsia, cesarean, and perinatal death (7-11%) were also more common than in the general population. There have been no published cases of clinical evidence of vertical transmission. Evidence is accumulating rapidly, so these data may need to be updated soon. The findings from this study can guide and enhance prenatal counseling of women with COVID-19 infection occurring during pregnancy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Thematic analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                melanie.murdock@queensu.ca
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                3 October 2024
                3 October 2024
                2024
                : 24
                : 1174
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Gender Studies, Queen’s University, ( https://ror.org/02y72wh86) Robert Sutherland Hall, Room 419 138 Union Street, Kingston, ON K7L 2P1 Canada
                [2 ]Department of Global Health, McMaster University, ( https://ror.org/02fa3aq29) 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8 Canada
                [3 ]School of Indigenous and Canadian Studies, Carleton University, ( https://ror.org/02qtvee93) 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada
                [4 ]Anishinaabe Elder Midwife and Founder of Zaagidwin Ndaknaan: A Centre of Excellence for Indigenous Midwifery, 322 Sweetgrass Miikan Road, Garden Village, Nipissing, ON P2B 1B0 Canada
                [5 ]Maternal Child Health Worker, Sandy Lake First Nation, P.O. Box 12, Sandy Lake, ON P0V 1V0 Canada
                [6 ]Maternal Child Health Worker, North Caribou Lake First Nation, P.O. Box 158, Weagamow Lake, ON P0V 2Y0 Canada
                [7 ]Department of Cultural Studies, Queen’s University, ( https://ror.org/02y72wh86) B176 Mackintosh-Corry Hall, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 Canada
                [8 ]Department of Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies, University of Western Ontario, ( https://ror.org/02grkyz14) 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7 Canada
                [9 ]Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, ( https://ror.org/00mxe0976) 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2 Canada
                [10 ]Midwifery Education Program, McMaster University, ( https://ror.org/02fa3aq29) 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8 Canada
                Article
                11489
                10.1186/s12913-024-11489-9
                11447931
                39363358
                c8b65dcf-2d64-4ff2-a00c-fce8f30f4c4b
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                : 23 February 2024
                : 26 August 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
                Award ID: 463557
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Health & Social care
                covid-19,evacuation policy,rural and remote indigenous health,health risk,indigenous feminist theory,indigenous feminist methodology

                Comments

                Comment on this article