21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-term Effectiveness of mHealth Physical Activity Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Mobile health (mHealth) interventions can increase physical activity (PA); however, their long-term impact is not well understood.

          Objective

          The primary aim of this study is to understand the immediate and long-term effects of mHealth interventions on PA. The secondary aim is to explore potential effect moderators.

          Methods

          We performed this study according to the Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and PsycINFO in July 2020. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials of mHealth interventions targeting PA as a primary outcome in adults. Eligible outcome measures were walking, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), total physical activity (TPA), and energy expenditure. Where reported, we extracted data for 3 time points (ie, end of intervention, follow-up ≤6 months, and follow-up >6 months). To explore effect moderators, we performed subgroup analyses by population, intervention design, and control group type. Results were summarized using random effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool.

          Results

          Of the 2828 identified studies, 117 were included. These studies reported on 21,118 participants with a mean age of 52.03 (SD 14.14) years, of whom 58.99% (n=12,459) were female. mHealth interventions significantly increased PA across all the 4 outcome measures at the end of intervention (walking standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.46, 95% CI 0.36-0.55; P<.001; MVPA SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.21-0.35; P<.001; TPA SMD 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.47; P<.001; energy expenditure SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.13-0.75; P=.01). Only 33 studies reported short-term follow-up measurements, and 8 studies reported long-term follow-up measurements in addition to end-of-intervention results. In the short term, effects were sustained for walking (SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.42; P=.002), MVPA (SMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.35; P=.008), and TPA (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.13-0.93; P=.009). In the long term, effects were also sustained for walking (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.10-0.39; P=.001) and MVPA (SMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.11-0.27; P<.001). We found the study population to be an effect moderator, with higher effect scores in sick and at-risk populations. PA was increased both in scalable and nonscalable mHealth intervention designs and regardless of the control group type. The risk of bias was rated high in 80.3% (94/117) of the studies. Heterogeneity was significant, resulting in low to very low quality of evidence.

          Conclusions

          mHealth interventions can foster small to moderate increases in PA. The effects are maintained long term; however, the effect size decreases over time. The results encourage using mHealth interventions in at-risk and sick populations and support the use of scalable mHealth intervention designs to affordably reach large populations. However, given the low evidence quality, further methodologically rigorous studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references164

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis in clinical trials

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J Med Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                April 2021
                30 April 2021
                : 23
                : 4
                : e26699
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute for Customer Insight University of St. Gallen St. Gallen Switzerland
                [2 ] Institute for Mobility University of St. Gallen St. Gallen Switzerland
                [3 ] Centre for Digital Health Interventions Institute of Technology Management University of St. Gallen St. Gallen Switzerland
                [4 ] CSS Insurance Lucerne Switzerland
                [5 ] Translational Neuromodeling Unit Institute for Biomedical Engineering University of Zurich and ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland
                [6 ] Centre for Digital Health Interventions Department of Management, Technology, and Economics ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland
                [7 ] Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore
                [8 ] School of Public Health Department of Primary Care and Public Health Imperial College London London United Kingdom
                [9 ] Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore
                [10 ] Future Health Technologies Programme, Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) Singapore-ETH Centre Singapore Singapore
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Annette Mönninghoff Annette.Moenninghoff@ 123456unisg.ch
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5424-2422
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-1209
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2991-7387
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4457-7277
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-9797
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-7664
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1402-7477
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5939-4145
                Article
                v23i4e26699
                10.2196/26699
                8122296
                33811021
                bb0212a5-2aff-4bf5-adf2-76ebe82ce910
                ©Annette Mönninghoff, Jan Niklas Kramer, Alexander Jan Hess, Kamila Ismailova, Gisbert W Teepe, Lorainne Tudor Car, Falk Müller-Riemenschneider, Tobias Kowatsch. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 30.04.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 22 December 2020
                : 15 January 2021
                : 24 February 2021
                : 2 April 2021
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                Medicine
                mhealth,physical activity,systematic review,meta-analysis,mobile phone
                Medicine
                mhealth, physical activity, systematic review, meta-analysis, mobile phone

                Comments

                Comment on this article