3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PD-1 inhibitor plus oncolytic vaccinia virus is a safe and effective treatment option for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is recommended as the first line treatment option for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), several immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur, especially hepatitis. We explored the therapeutic benefits and safety profile of combining oncolytic vaccinia virus, JX-594, with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor.

          Methods

          We used early-stage and advanced-stage orthotopic murine mRCC models developed by our group. PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or a PD-1 inhibitor combined with either JX-594 or a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor were systemically injected through the peritoneum. An immunofluorescence analysis was performed to analyze the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). irAEs were assessed in terms of hepatitis.

          Results

          In the early-stage mRCC model mice, the combination of JX-594 and a PD-1 inhibitor significantly decreased the primary tumor size and number of lung nodules, compared with the ICI combination, but the JX-594 and PD-1 inhibitor combination and ICI combination did not differ significantly in the advanced-stage mRCC model mice. The JX-594 and PD-1 inhibitor combination induced tumor-suppressing TIME changes in both the early- and advanced-stage mRCC models. Furthermore, mice treated with the ICI combination had significantly greater hepatic injuries than those treated with the JX-594 and PD-1 inhibitor combination which was evaluated in early-stage mRCC model.

          Conclusions

          The JX-594 and PD-1 inhibitor combination effectively reduced primary tumors and the metastatic burden, similar to ICI combination therapy, through dynamic remodeling of the TIME. Furthermore, hepatitis was significantly decreased in the JX-594 and PD-1 inhibitor combination group, suggesting the potential benefit of that combination for reducing ICI-induced toxicity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fatal Toxic Effects Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

            Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a mainstay of cancer treatment. Although rare, fulminant and fatal toxic effects may complicate these otherwise transformative therapies; characterizing these events requires integration of global data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Therapeutic Targeting of the Tumor Microenvironment

              Strategies to therapeutically target the tumor microenvironment (TME) have emerged as a promising approach for cancer treatment in recent years due to the critical roles of the TME in regulating tumor progression and modulating response to standard-of-care therapies. Here, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the most advanced TME-directed therapies, which have either been clinically approved or are currently being evaluated in trials, including immunotherapies, antiangiogenic drugs, and treatments directed against cancer-associated fibroblasts and the extracellular matrix. We also discuss some of the challenges associated with TME therapies, and future perspectives in this evolving field. SIGNIFICANCE: This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current therapies targeting the TME, combining a discussion of the underlying basic biology with clinical evaluation of different therapeutic approaches, and highlighting the challenges and future perspectives.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                uroham@yuhs.ac
                Journal
                Cancer Cell Int
                Cancer Cell Int
                Cancer Cell International
                BioMed Central (London )
                1475-2867
                30 January 2024
                30 January 2024
                2024
                : 24
                : 50
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, ( https://ror.org/01wjejq96) Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [2 ]Department of Urology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, ( https://ror.org/04sze3c15) Yongin, Republic of Korea
                [3 ]Research Center, SillaJen, Inc., ( https://ror.org/00vpqzk55) Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do Republic of Korea
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, ( https://ror.org/01wjejq96) Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Article
                3238
                10.1186/s12935-024-03238-z
                10829278
                38291394
                b1a2a73b-a9da-4019-8c12-1d7d080438f3
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 30 November 2023
                : 21 January 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: Korean Urological Oncology Society
                Award ID: KUOS 22-01
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003710, Korea Health Industry Development Institute;
                Award ID: HI17C1095
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003725, National Research Foundation of Korea;
                Award ID: 2019R1A2C1002863
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008005, Yonsei University College of Medicine;
                Award ID: 6-2020-0106
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                renal cell carcinoma,oncolytic viruses,immunotherapy,immune-related adverse events,hepatitis

                Comments

                Comment on this article