1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The long-running issues of tuberculosis

      ,
      The Lancet Global Health
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The impact of social protection and poverty elimination on global tuberculosis incidence: a statistical modelling analysis of Sustainable Development Goal 1

          Summary Background The End TB Strategy and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are intimately linked by their common targets and approaches. SDG 1 aims to end extreme poverty and expand social protection coverage by 2030. Achievement of SDG 1 is likely to affect the tuberculosis epidemic through a range of pathways. We estimate the reduction in global tuberculosis incidence that could be obtained by reaching SDG 1. Methods We developed a conceptual framework linking key indicators of SDG 1 progress to tuberculosis incidence via well described risk factor pathways and populated it with data from the SDG data repository and the WHO tuberculosis database for 192 countries. Correlations and mediation analyses informed the strength of the association between the SDG 1 subtargets and tuberculosis incidence, resulting in a simplified framework for modelling. The simplified framework linked key indicators for SDG 1 directly to tuberculosis incidence. We applied an exponential decay model based on linear associations between SDG 1 indicators and tuberculosis incidence to estimate tuberculosis incidence in 2035. Findings Ending extreme poverty resulted in a reduction in global incidence of tuberculosis of 33·4% (95% credible interval 15·5–44·5) by 2035 and expanding social protection coverage resulted in a reduction in incidence of 76·1% (45·2–89·9) by 2035; both pathways together resulted in a reduction in incidence of 84·3% (54·7–94·9). Interpretation Full achievement of SDG 1 could have a substantial effect on the global burden of tuberculosis. Cross-sectoral approaches that promote poverty reduction and social protection expansion will be crucial complements to health interventions, accelerating progress towards the End TB targets. Funding World Health Organization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The impact of the Brazilian Family Health Strategy and the conditional cash transfer on tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Rio de Janeiro: an individual-level analysis of secondary data

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Challenges and opportunities to end tuberculosis in the COVID-19 era

              On World Tuberculosis Day, 2020, we warned of the impending impact of COVID-19 on the tuberculosis pandemic. We also made a plea that the world must not forget tuberculosis while it focused on COVID-19. 1 1 year later, on World Tuberculosis Day, 2021, we reflect on the compelling evidence of the challenges that COVID-19 has created for tuberculosis control and look forward to opportunities for integrated strategies to address the COVID-19 and tuberculosis pandemics. We are not on course to eliminate tuberculosis. The Stop TB Partnership estimates that the past 12 months have pushed back global tuberculosis progress by 12 years. 2 Achieving the WHO's End TB Strategy goals will require an estimated US$15 billion additional funding annually. Less than half of the funding commitments made at the 2018 UN High Level Meeting on tuberculosis have been delivered. Cuts to the UK overseas Official Development Assistance will further contribute to this shortfall. COVID-19 has challenged health systems and restricted essential health service delivery. 3 Health system infrastructure, from diagnostic tools to the workforce, has pivoted towards COVID-19 and away from competing illnesses, including tuberculosis. 4 Health-care access has been constrained due to transport disruptions, restricted movement, reduced opening hours, depleted staffing levels, fear, and stigma. 5 In nine countries with a high tuberculosis burden, which contribute 60% of the world's tuberculosis cases, tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment decreased by 23%, equating to 1 million missed cases. Similar to the 2014–15 Ebola virus disease outbreaks, restricted access to health care has led to an increase in late, disseminated presentations of tuberculosis, associated with adverse treatment outcomes and death. 2 Indeed, the COVID-19 pandemic is predicted to increase tuberculosis deaths globally by 20% over the next 5 years. 6 These challenges to tuberculosis diagnosis, notification, care, and cure, are especially concerning in the context of global antimicrobial resistance. Despite multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis being estimated to contribute up to one third of deaths from antimicrobial resistance globally, the minority of people with MDR tuberculosis have access to all-oral treatment regimens. Long, toxic regimens involving intravenous or intramuscular injections remain the mainstay in many low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) with high tuberculosis burdens. These regimens are costly for patients and the health system with low rates of adherence and treatment success. These conditions, coupled with COVID-19-related difficulties for people with tuberculosis to engage with care, are likely to foment drug resistance and threaten tuberculosis being treatable with a return to the preantibiotic era. To avoid further unacceptable morbidity and mortality, effective, person-centred strategies are urgently required to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on tuberculosis. There are many opportunities to learn from and integrate COVID-19 and tuberculosis strategies to deliver health interventions with broader benefits on prevention, case-detection, and care of COVID-19, tuberculosis, and other illnesses. COVID-19 has demonstrated what the scientific community can deliver with political will and funding. Large-scale, adaptive, randomised trials have provided rapid evidence on effective new COVID-19 treatments. Conversely, apart from bedaquiline and delamanid, novel drug development for tuberculosis has been stagnant for decades. With regards to prevention, multiple COVID-19 vaccines, which appear effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease, are being rolled out within a year of the pandemic onset. In contrast, the BCG vaccine is a century old and ineffective in adults, and the tuberculosis vaccine pipeline is strikingly sparse. However, the infrastructure, investment, supply chain, and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines represent an opportunity for future tuberculosis vaccination programmes, including the promising M72/AS01 E tuberculosis vaccine. 7 In addition, mRNA technology used to develop COVID vaccines has great potential to be reconfigured to other infections, including tuberculosis. In many settings, GeneXpert machines have been largely repurposed to test for SARS-CoV-2 during the pandemic. However, as the Stop TB Partnership rightly notes: “Tuberculosis testing must continue”. Increased funding, logistics, training, staffing, transport systems, and use of GeneXpert could support enhanced tuberculosis diagnosis, early case detection, and resistance testing. More broadly, there might be opportunities to overcome silos in diagnostic facilities and develop enhanced multiplex platforms to simultaneously test for several priority diseases. Bilateral tuberculosis and COVID-19 case-finding and testing among people with respiratory symptoms or predisposing comorbidities, such as HIV and diabetes, are likely to be cost-effective and prepare health systems for a rapid response to future respiratory threats. Community-based and community-led responses that take diagnosis, care, and support to the doors of those affected have much potential. For example, people with respiratory symptoms and illness should be able to receive community-based contact tracing, directly observed therapy, and isolation and quarantine support from trusted friends, family, or neighbours. 4 Such strategies could improve distribution and use of appropriate personal protective equipment, reduce nosocomial transmission of communicable respiratory diseases, and improve the value-for-money of trained health-care worker time. They will also be vital for longer term management of people with post-COVID or post-tuberculosis lung disease and complications, 8 conditions which require more coordinated research and intervention. In some countries, careful targeted use of artificial intelligence software and digital radiography has the potential to be used to support enhanced contact tracing and outreach strategies for communicable respiratory illnesses. 4 Accurate information and education is essential. Governments and health systems should aim to integrate evidence-based public health messaging about tuberculosis, COVID-19, and other respiratory conditions. Moreover, achieving successful public health campaigns will be impossible without meaningful engagement with communities, civil-society representatives, and advocacy groups. This engagement is imperative to dispel myths, reduce stigma and fear, change health behaviour, and improve access to services. COVID-19, tuberculosis, and respiratory illnesses typify health inequality, are strongly associated with poverty, and share biosocial determinants, including undernutrition or malnutrition, ethnicity, and belonging to marginalised, underserved groups.9, 10 Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic has worsened impoverishment and nutrition for millions of vulnerable households, and lockdown and stay-at-home measures pose a risk of increased tuberculosis transmission, especially with concomitant overcrowding. For those diagnosed with tuberculosis, holistic, person-centred care and support has been difficult to maintain during the COVID-19 pandemic. While potentially beneficial, virtual consultations and adherence support, including video observed therapy, is not available routinely in many LMICs. Moreover, there have been colossal challenges to delivering food, economic, and psychosocial support to tuberculosis-affected households during COVID-19 times, 4 which might increase their likelihood of incurring catastrophic tuberculosis-related costs (figure ). 11 This serves to re-emphasise the crucial importance of social protection and universal health coverage to provide income security, enable health-care access, and reduce out-of-pocket health-care expenditure. Figure Proportion of people with tuberculosis and their households facing catastrophic costs in 17 national surveys completed since 2015 Percentages refer to the pooled average value across all surveys, with the range representing the minimum and maximum values in the 17 countries. Reproduced with permissions from WHO's Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. 12 On World Tuberculosis Day, 2021, our year-old plea to not forget tuberculosis is now more important and relevant than ever: one person dies of tuberculosis every 20 s. The clock is ticking. TW is supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust (209075/Z/17/Z and Joint Global Health Trials, MR/V004832/1), the Medical Research Council (MRC), Department for International Development, the Academy of Medical Sciences, and the Swedish Health Research Council. LEC is supported by grants from the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trial Partnership (EDCTP, DRIA2014-309), the MRC, the TB REACH Initiative of the Stop TB Partnership (STBP/TBREACH//GSA/W5-07), the Wellcome Trust (contract pending), and the Health Protection Research Unit for Emerging and Zoonotic Infections. PM is funded by the Wellcome Trust (206575/Z/17/Z). KAM works on projects funded with UK aid from the UK Government. SBS is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Lung Health and TB in Africa at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (16/136/35) and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Research Programme Consortium Leaving no-one behind, transforming gendered pathways to health for TB (LIGHT PO8614). All authors declare no competing interests.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Lancet Global Health
                The Lancet Global Health
                Elsevier BV
                2214109X
                October 2021
                October 2021
                : 9
                : 10
                : e1339-e1340
                Article
                10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00401-0
                aa402341-b212-4095-a4a9-416ec30d2821
                © 2021

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article