3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Oncolytic virotherapy in cancer treatment: challenges and optimization prospects

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging cancer therapeutics that offer a multifaceted therapeutic platform for the benefits of replicating and lysing tumor cells, being engineered to express transgenes, modulating the tumor microenvironment (TME), and having a tolerable safety profile that does not overlap with other cancer therapeutics. The mechanism of OVs combined with other antitumor agents is based on immune-mediated attack resistance and might benefit patients who fail to achieve durable responses after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. In this Review, we summarize data on the OV mechanism and limitations of monotherapy, which are currently in the process of combination partner development, especially with ICIs. We discuss some of the hurdles that have limited the preclinical and clinical development of OVs. We also describe the available data and provide guidance for optimizing OVs in clinical practice, as well as a summary of approved and promising novel OVs with clinical indications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references187

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma

          Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, is usually rapidly fatal. The current standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is surgical resection to the extent feasible, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. In this trial we compared radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus temozolomide, given concomitantly with and after radiotherapy, in terms of efficacy and safety. Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed glioblastoma were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (fractionated focal irradiation in daily fractions of 2 Gy given 5 days per week for 6 weeks, for a total of 60 Gy) or radiotherapy plus continuous daily temozolomide (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day, 7 days per week from the first to the last day of radiotherapy), followed by six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (150 to 200 mg per square meter for 5 days during each 28-day cycle). The primary end point was overall survival. A total of 573 patients from 85 centers underwent randomization. The median age was 56 years, and 84 percent of patients had undergone debulking surgery. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the median survival was 14.6 months with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 12.1 months with radiotherapy alone. The unadjusted hazard ratio for death in the radiotherapy-plus-temozolomide group was 0.63 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.75; P<0.001 by the log-rank test). The two-year survival rate was 26.5 percent with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 10.4 percent with radiotherapy alone. Concomitant treatment with radiotherapy plus temozolomide resulted in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects in 7 percent of patients. The addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma resulted in a clinically meaningful and statistically significant survival benefit with minimal additional toxicity. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Immunogenic cell death and DAMPs in cancer therapy.

            Although it was thought that apoptotic cells, when rapidly phagocytosed, underwent a silent death that did not trigger an immune response, in recent years a new concept of immunogenic cell death (ICD) has emerged. The immunogenic characteristics of ICD are mainly mediated by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which include surface-exposed calreticulin (CRT), secreted ATP and released high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1). Most DAMPs can be recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). In this Review, we discuss the role of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in regulating the immunogenicity of dying cancer cells and the effect of therapy-resistant cancer microevolution on ICD.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Talimogene Laherparepvec Improves Durable Response Rate in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

              Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a herpes simplex virus type 1-derived oncolytic immunotherapy designed to selectively replicate within tumors and produce granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to enhance systemic antitumor immune responses. T-VEC was compared with GM-CSF in patients with unresected stage IIIB to IV melanoma in a randomized open-label phase III trial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1562822Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2597247Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2597304Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2538502Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                15 December 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1308890
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan, China
                [2] 2 Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan, China
                [3] 3 Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology , Wuhan, China
                [4] 4 Department of Oncology, The Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University , Wuhan, China
                [5] 5 National “111” Center for Cellular Regulation and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering (Ministry of Education), Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), College of Bioengineering, Hubei University of Technology , Wuhan, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Zong Sheng Guo, University at Buffalo, United States

                Reviewed by: Firas Hamdan, University of Helsinki, Finland

                Shyambabu Chaurasiya, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, United States

                *Correspondence: Yang Wang, wangyang@ 123456mail.hbut.edu.cn
                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2023.1308890
                10758479
                38169820
                97831791-b2ec-4b84-b7b6-8c68fe5765aa
                Copyright © 2023 Chen, Zuo, Zhou and Wang

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 07 October 2023
                : 27 November 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 187, Pages: 14, Words: 7462
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (2023AFB1035), Bethune-Cancer Radiotherapy Translational Medicine Research Fund of China (Grant No. flzh202117) and the Beijing Kechuang Medical Development Foundation Fund of China (Grant No. KC2021-JX-0186-31).
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review
                Custom metadata
                Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

                Immunology
                oncolytic viruses (ovs),combination therapy,antitumor immunity,challenges,immune checkpoint inhibitor

                Comments

                Comment on this article