Combining Viedma Ripening and Temperature Cycling Deracemization

Abstract

While much data are available for the Viedma ripening and temperature cycling deracemization processes, not much is known about the advantages (or disadvantages) of a combination of the two. We here try to elucidate what happens when Viedma ripening is used in combination with temperature cycling by comparing not only the deracemization times but also the change in the sizes of the crystals. We found that, in the case of NMPA ( rac-(2-methylbenzylidene)-phenylglycine amide) as a model compound, combined experiments significantly increase the deracemization time. By tuning the process parameters, it is possible to approach experimental conditions where both Viedma ripening and temperature cycling control the deracemization. Under those conditions, however, the deracemization time is not significantly improved. Following our results, it seems unlikely that a combination of Viedma ripening and temperature cycling would shorten the deracemization time. Nevertheless, these experiments might provide clues for unraveling the mechanism of temperature cycling.

Abstract

For deracemization, temperature cycling (TC) is in general faster than Viedma ripening (VR). The combination of the two methods leads to intermediate deracemization times.