75
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Influence of Diet on Fertility and the Implications for Public Health Nutrition in the United States

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite growing evidence of the impact of diet on human fertility, few studies have examined the public health implications of this association in the United States (U.S.). This narrative review summarizes current scientific evidence on associations between dietary intake and fertility, discusses challenges in the public health landscape surrounding infertility, and proposes evidence-based recommendations to address these issues. Diets high in unsaturated fats, whole grains, vegetables, and fish have been associated with improved fertility in both women and men. While current evidence on the role of dairy, alcohol, and caffeine is inconsistent, saturated fats, and sugar have been associated with poorer fertility outcomes in women and men. Furthermore, women and men with obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m 2] have a higher risk of infertility. This risk is extended to women who are underweight (BMI <20 kg/m 2). Diet and BMI influence outcomes during clinical treatment for infertility. Further, women in the U.S. who belong to an underrepresented minority group, have low income, or have low educational attainment, have significantly higher rates of infertility outcomes as compared to women who are non-Hispanic white, have high income, or have high educational attainment. Given this, it may be prudent to integrate nutrition counseling into both clinical guidelines for infertility as well as national dietary guidelines for individuals of reproductive age. Further studies on diet and reproductive health may enhance our ability to improve existing fertility programs across the U.S. and to deliver tailored care to women and men within at-risk groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dietary Intake Among US Adults, 1999-2012.

          Most studies of US dietary trends have evaluated major macronutrients or only a few dietary factors. Understanding trends in summary measures of diet quality for multiple individual foods and nutrients, and the corresponding disparities among population subgroups, is crucial to identify challenges and opportunities to improve dietary intake for all US adults.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychological impact of infertility.

            The inability to conceive children is experienced as a stressful situation by individuals and couples all around the world. The consequences of infertility are manifold and can include societal repercussions and personal suffering. Advances in assisted reproductive technologies, such as IVF, can offer hope to many couples where treatment is available, although barriers exist in terms of medical coverage and affordability. The medicalization of infertility has unwittingly led to a disregard for the emotional responses that couples experience, which include distress, loss of control, stigmatization, and a disruption in the developmental trajectory of adulthood. Evidence is emerging of an association between stress of fertility treatment and patient drop-out and pregnancy rates. Fortunately, psychological interventions, especially those emphasizing stress management and coping-skills training, have been shown to have beneficial effects for infertility patients. Further research is needed to understand the association between distress and fertility outcome, as well as effective psychosocial interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach.

              To estimate the prevalence of infertility using a current duration approach for comparison with a traditional constructed measure. Cross-sectional survey. Not applicable. A nationally representative sample of females aged 15-44 years. None. Infertility prevalence estimated by two approaches: [1] a constructed measure derived from questions on sexual activity, contraception, relationship status, and pregnancy, and [2] a measure based on estimated time to pregnancy derived from the respondents' current duration of pregnancy attempt (i.e., current duration approach). Associations with self-reported descriptive characteristics using weighted logistic regression or parametric survival models for each respective approach. Infertility prevalence was approximately twofold higher using the current duration approach (15.5%; 95% confidence interval 8.6%-27.5%) vs. the constructed measure (7.0%; 95% confidence interval 6.2%-7.8%). Both methods identified similar patterns of increasing age, lower education, nulliparity, and history of gynecologic disorders as being associated with measures of impaired fecundity, whereas opposing patterns were seen for racial/ethnic identification and poverty status. Infertility prevalence based on a current duration approach was consistent with other US prospective cohort studies with preconception enrollment. These findings underscore the importance of definition and methodologic approach for estimating the prevalence of infertility. Published by Elsevier Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                31 July 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : 211
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA, United States
                [2] 2School of Medicine, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
                [3] 3Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Danelle T. Lobdell, Environmental Protection Agency, United States

                Reviewed by: Mary Lee Barron, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, United States; Milena Castro, University of Costa Rica, Costa Rica

                *Correspondence: Josiemer Mattei jmattei@ 123456hsph.harvard.edu

                This article was submitted to Population, Reproductive and Sexual Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2018.00211
                6079277
                30109221
                89af7d27-37cc-4ddf-9bc2-e475f0b6b631
                Copyright © 2018 Panth, Gavarkovs, Tamez and Mattei.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 April 2018
                : 09 July 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 47, Pages: 7, Words: 5183
                Funding
                Funded by: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 10.13039/501100003141
                Funded by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 10.13039/100000050
                Award ID: HL120951
                Categories
                Public Health
                Mini Review

                diet and fertility,nutrition and fertility,infertility,infertility treatment,obesity and fertility,fertility disparities

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content113

                Cited by45

                Most referenced authors455