18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on scientists

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two surveys of principal investigators conducted between April 2020 and January 2021 reveal that while the COVID-19 pandemic’s initial impacts on scientists’ research time seem alleviated, there has been a decline in the rate of initiating new projects. This dimension of impact disproportionately affects female scientists and those with young children and appears to be homogeneous across fields. These findings may have implications for understanding the long-term effects of the pandemic on scientific research.

          Abstract

          The pandemic has caused disruption to many aspects of scientific research. In this Comment the authors describe the findings from surveys of scientists between April 2020 and January 2021, which suggests there was a decline in new projects started in that time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China

          Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

            The COVID-19 pandemic represents a massive global health crisis. Because the crisis requires large-scale behaviour change and places significant psychological burdens on individuals, insights from the social and behavioural sciences can be used to help align human behaviour with the recommendations of epidemiologists and public health experts. Here we discuss evidence from a selection of research topics relevant to pandemics, including work on navigating threats, social and cultural influences on behaviour, science communication, moral decision-making, leadership, and stress and coping. In each section, we note the nature and quality of prior research, including uncertainty and unsettled issues. We identify several insights for effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight important gaps researchers should move quickly to fill in the coming weeks and months.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              COVID‐19 and the Gender Gap in Work Hours

              School and daycare closures due to the COVID‐19 pandemic have increased caregiving responsibilities for working parents. As a result, many have changed their work hours to meet these growing demands. In this study, we use panel data from the U.S. Current Population Survey to examine changes in mothers’ and fathers’ work hours from February through April, 2020, the period of time prior to the widespread COVID‐19 outbreak in the U.S. and through its first peak. Using person‐level fixed effects models, we find that mothers with young children have reduced their work hours four to five times more than fathers. Consequently, the gender gap in work hours has grown by 20 to 50 percent. These findings indicate yet another negative consequence of the COVID‐19 pandemic, highlighting the challenges it poses to women's work hours and employment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dashun.wang@northwestern.edu
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                26 October 2021
                26 October 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 6188
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.16753.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, Center for Science of Science and Innovation, , Northwestern University, ; Evanston, IL 60208 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.16753.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, Kellogg School of Management, , Northwestern University, ; Evanston, IL 60208 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.16753.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems, , Northwestern University, ; Evanston, IL 60208 USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.16753.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, McCormick School of Engineering, , Northwestern University, ; Evanston, IL 60208 USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Harvard Business School, , Harvard University, ; Boston, MA 02163 USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard, , Harvard University, ; Boston, MA 02134 USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, , Harvard University, ; Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6659-5770
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3018-4544
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5535-8304
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-2206
                Article
                26428
                10.1038/s41467-021-26428-z
                8548590
                34702862
                8301c125-558f-4ec2-a3fd-80bca6b9e824
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 June 2021
                : 6 October 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000181, United States Department of Defense | United States Air Force | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AF Office of Scientific Research);
                Award ID: FA9550-19-1-0354
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000879, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation;
                Award ID: G-2019-12485
                Award ID: G-2020-13873
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Peter G. Peterson Foundation
                Categories
                Comment
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                scientific community,careers
                Uncategorized
                scientific community, careers

                Comments

                Comment on this article