8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A modified walk-in system versus scheduled appointments in a secondary-care prosthetic and orthotic clinic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Waiting is common in health care, delays intervention, and has negative effects on satisfaction with services.

          Objectives:

          To evaluate effects of a modified walk-in system, where patients were invited consecutively from the waiting list to attend the clinic on a walk-in basis, on waiting times, services, and work environment.

          Study design:

          Parallel-group trial.

          Methods:

          In all, 1286 consecutive patients in need of shoe insoles were randomized to waiting lists for modified walk-in ( n = 655) or a scheduled appointment ( n = 631). Seven staff members also participated.

          Results:

          The median indirect waiting time to first appointment was 40 days shorter for modified walk-in (135 days) than for scheduled appointment (175 days; p < 0.001); 17% of those randomized to modified walk-in did not attend the clinic compared to 6% for scheduled appointment ( p < 0.001). Mean direct waiting time in the waiting room was 9.9 min longer for modified walk-in than for scheduled appointment ( p < 0.001). Patients attending modified walk-in or a scheduled appointment reported similar levels of satisfaction with services. Staff reported more support from co-workers with modified walk-in than with scheduled appointment ( p = 0.041).

          Conclusion:

          The modified walk-in can reduce indirect waiting times without any substantial worsening of direct waiting times, service quality, or work environment. Studies are needed to investigate why many patients drop out from modified walk-in.

          Clinical relevance

          A modified walk-in system can cut the queues and create more timely interventions by reducing indirect waiting times. This system can therefore be recommended in secondary-care prosthetic and orthotic clinics to reduce patients’ suffering from their health condition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Appointment scheduling in health care: Challenges and opportunities

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care.

            Delay of care is a persistent and undesirable feature of current health care systems. Although delay seems to be inevitable and linked to resource limitations, it often is neither. Rather, it is usually the result of unplanned, irrational scheduling and resource allocation. Application of queuing theory and principles of industrial engineering, adapted appropriately to clinical settings, can reduce delay substantially, even in small practices, without requiring additional resources. One model, sometimes referred to as advanced access, has increasingly been shown to reduce waiting times in primary care. The core principle of advanced access is that patients calling to schedule a physician visit are offered an appointment the same day. Advanced access is not sustainable if patient demand for appointments is permanently greater than physician capacity to offer appointments. Six elements of advanced access are important in its application balancing supply and demand, reducing backlog, reducing the variety of appointment types, developing contingency plans for unusual circumstances, working to adjust demand profiles, and increasing the availability of bottleneck resources. Although these principles are powerful, they are counter to deeply held beliefs and established practices in health care organizations. Adopting these principles requires strong leadership investment and support.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments.

              The need to measure and evaluate orthotics and prosthetics (O&P) practice has received growing recognition in the past several years. Reliable and valid self-report instruments are needed that can help facilities evaluate patient outcomes. The objective of this project was to develop a set of self-report instruments that assess functional status, quality of life, and satisfaction with devices and services that can be used in an orthotics and prosthetics clinic. Selecting items from a variety of existing instruments, the authors developed and revised four instruments that differentiate patients with varying levels of lower limb function, quality of life, and satisfaction with devices and services. Evidence of construct validity is provided by hierarchies of item difficulty that are consistent with clinical experience. For example, with the lower limb function instrument, running one block was much more difficult than walking indoors. The instruments demonstrate adequate internal consistency (0.88 for lower limb function, 0.88 for quality of life, 0.74 for service satisfaction, 0.78 for device satisfaction). The next steps in their research programme are to evaluate sensitivity and construct validity. The Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) is a promising self-report instrument which may, with further development, allow orthotic and prosthetic practitioners to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of their services as required by accreditation standards such as those of the American Board for Certification in Orthotics and Prosthetics that mandate quality assessment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Prosthet Orthot Int
                Prosthet Orthot Int
                POI
                sppoi
                Prosthetics and Orthotics International
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                0309-3646
                1746-1553
                14 September 2017
                October 2018
                : 42
                : 5
                : 483-489
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
                [2 ]University Health Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
                Author notes
                [*]Gustav Jarl, Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Örebro University Hospital, S-701 85 Örebro, Sweden. Email: gustav.jarl@ 123456regionorebrolan.se
                Article
                10.1177_0309364617728120
                10.1177/0309364617728120
                6146309
                28905683
                7ee27da2-dd82-4d8d-96eb-1ccf3c61dbbc
                © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2017

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 20 December 2016
                : 24 April 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Region Örebro County, Sweden, ;
                Categories
                Original Research Reports

                rehabilitation,lower limb orthotics,orthotics
                rehabilitation, lower limb orthotics, orthotics

                Comments

                Comment on this article