16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reading Comprehension and Metalinguistic Knowledge in Chinese Readers: A Meta-Analysis

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Metalinguistic knowledge has a facilitative effect on reading comprehension. This meta-analysis examined the relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and reading comprehension among Chinese students. By focusing on both Chinese and English scripts' reading comprehension performance, this study synthesized 46 studies with 73 independent samples that represented 10,793 Chinese students from primary school to university levels. We found that in both Chinese and English scripts' reading, morphological awareness had the strongest correlation with reading comprehension, whereas both phonological awareness and orthographical skill had a similar medium correlation with reading comprehension. All three metalinguistic knowledge, which was not significantly influenced by the selected moderators of grade group, area, language type, and assessment, had an independent correlation with reading comprehension. The results suggested that reading stages did not significantly impact the function of metalinguistic knowledge on both Chinese and English scripts' reading comprehension for Chinese students. In addition, for Chinese students, morphological awareness plays a more important role than phonological awareness and orthographical skill in both Chinese and English scripts' reading comprehension.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert

          There is intense public interest in questions surrounding how children learn to read and how they can best be taught. Research in psychological science has provided answers to many of these questions but, somewhat surprisingly, this research has been slow to make inroads into educational policy and practice. Instead, the field has been plagued by decades of "reading wars." Even now, there remains a wide gap between the state of research knowledge about learning to read and the state of public understanding. The aim of this article is to fill this gap. We present a comprehensive tutorial review of the science of learning to read, spanning from children's earliest alphabetic skills through to the fluent word recognition and skilled text comprehension characteristic of expert readers. We explain why phonics instruction is so central to learning in a writing system such as English. But we also move beyond phonics, reviewing research on what else children need to learn to become expert readers and considering how this might be translated into effective classroom practice. We call for an end to the reading wars and recommend an agenda for instruction and research in reading acquisition that is balanced, developmentally informed, and based on a deep understanding of how language and writing systems work.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Contributions of Morphology Beyond Phonology to Literacy Outcomes of Upper Elementary and Middle-School Students.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Kindergarten Prediction of Reading Skills: A Longitudinal Comparative Analysis.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                05 February 2020
                2019
                : 10
                : 3037
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Education and Science, Jiaying University , Meizhou, China
                [2] 2Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong , Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
                [3] 3Department of Science and Environmental Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong , Tai Po, Hong Kong
                [4] 4Department of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong , Tai Po, Hong Kong
                [5] 5University of Southampton , Southampton, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jing Zhao, Capital Normal University, China

                Reviewed by: George Manolitsis, University of Crete, Greece; Susanna Siu-sze Yeung, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Birkan Güldenoglu, Ankara University, Turkey

                *Correspondence: Yang Dong yangdong3-c@ 123456my.cityu.edu.hk

                This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03037
                7013083
                32116868
                75103198-1474-45c5-bc33-e0a9619eb7c5
                Copyright © 2020 Dong, Peng, Sun, Wu and Wang.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 October 2019
                : 23 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 119, Pages: 15, Words: 10841
                Categories
                Psychology
                Systematic Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                reading comprehension,metalinguistic knowledge,phonological awareness,morphological awareness,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content259

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors1,108