17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To present an overview of current machine learning methods and their use in medical research, focusing on select machine learning techniques, best practices, and deep learning.

          Methods

          A systematic literature search in PubMed was performed for articles pertinent to the topic of artificial intelligence methods used in medicine with an emphasis on ophthalmology.

          Results

          A review of machine learning and deep learning methodology for the audience without an extensive technical computer programming background.

          Conclusions

          Artificial intelligence has a promising future in medicine; however, many challenges remain.

          Translational Relevance

          The aim of this review article is to provide the nontechnical readers a layman's explanation of the machine learning methods being used in medicine today. The goal is to provide the reader a better understanding of the potential and challenges of artificial intelligence within the field of medicine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Automated Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

          Question Can an algorithm based on deep learning achieve expert-level performance at diagnosing plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity? Finding In this technology evaluation study including 5511 retinal photographs, using 5-fold cross-validation, the algorithm achieved mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 and 0.99 for the diagnoses of normal and plus disease, respectively. On an independent test set of 100 images, the algorithm achieved 91% accuracy and a quadratic-weighted κ coefficient of 0.92, outperforming 6 of 8 retinopathy of prematurity experts. Meaning These findings suggest the proposed algorithm can objectively diagnose plus disease with a proficiency comparable with human experts. This technology evaluation study examines the validity of an algorithm based on deep learning for automated diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity from retinal photographs. Importance Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. The decision to treat is primarily based on the presence of plus disease, defined as dilation and tortuosity of retinal vessels. However, clinical diagnosis of plus disease is highly subjective and variable. Objective To implement and validate an algorithm based on deep learning to automatically diagnose plus disease from retinal photographs. Design, Setting, and Participants A deep convolutional neural network was trained using a data set of 5511 retinal photographs. Each image was previously assigned a reference standard diagnosis (RSD) based on consensus of image grading by 3 experts and clinical diagnosis by 1 expert (ie, normal, pre–plus disease, or plus disease). The algorithm was evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation and tested on an independent set of 100 images. Images were collected from 8 academic institutions participating in the Imaging and Informatics in ROP (i-ROP) cohort study. The deep learning algorithm was tested against 8 ROP experts, each of whom had more than 10 years of clinical experience and more than 5 peer-reviewed publications about ROP. Data were collected from July 2011 to December 2016. Data were analyzed from December 2016 to September 2017. Exposures A deep learning algorithm trained on retinal photographs. Main Outcomes and Measures Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate performance of the algorithm against the RSD. Quadratic-weighted κ coefficients were calculated for ternary classification (ie, normal, pre–plus disease, and plus disease) to measure agreement with the RSD and 8 independent experts. Results Of the 5511 included retinal photographs, 4535 (82.3%) were graded as normal, 805 (14.6%) as pre–plus disease, and 172 (3.1%) as plus disease, based on the RSD. Mean (SD) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistics were 0.94 (0.01) for the diagnosis of normal (vs pre–plus disease or plus disease) and 0.98 (0.01) for the diagnosis of plus disease (vs normal or pre–plus disease). For diagnosis of plus disease in an independent test set of 100 retinal images, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 93% with 94% specificity. For detection of pre–plus disease or worse, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 94%, respectively. On the same test set, the algorithm achieved a quadratic-weighted κ coefficient of 0.92 compared with the RSD, outperforming 6 of 8 ROP experts. Conclusions and Relevance This fully automated algorithm diagnosed plus disease in ROP with comparable or better accuracy than human experts. This has potential applications in disease detection, monitoring, and prognosis in infants at risk of ROP.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma

            The study aimed to develop machine learning models that have strong prediction power and interpretability for diagnosis of glaucoma based on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and visual field (VF). We collected various candidate features from the examination of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and visual field (VF). We also developed synthesized features from original features. We then selected the best features proper for classification (diagnosis) through feature evaluation. We used 100 cases of data as a test dataset and 399 cases of data as a training and validation dataset. To develop the glaucoma prediction model, we considered four machine learning algorithms: C5.0, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN). We repeatedly composed a learning model using the training dataset and evaluated it by using the validation dataset. Finally, we got the best learning model that produces the highest validation accuracy. We analyzed quality of the models using several measures. The random forest model shows best performance and C5.0, SVM, and KNN models show similar accuracy. In the random forest model, the classification accuracy is 0.98, sensitivity is 0.983, specificity is 0.975, and AUC is 0.979. The developed prediction models show high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in classifying among glaucoma and healthy eyes. It will be used for predicting glaucoma against unknown examination records. Clinicians may reference the prediction results and be able to make better decisions. We may combine multiple learning models to increase prediction accuracy. The C5.0 model includes decision rules for prediction. It can be used to explain the reasons for specific predictions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Prediction of Anti-VEGF Treatment Requirements in Neovascular AMD Using a Machine Learning Approach

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Transl Vis Sci Technol
                Transl Vis Sci Technol
                tvst
                tvst
                TVST
                Translational Vision Science & Technology
                The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
                2164-2591
                27 February 2020
                February 2020
                : 9
                : 2
                : 14
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) , Portland, Oregon, United States
                [2 ] Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, Oregon, United States
                [3 ] Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital , Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States
                Author notes
                Correspondence: J. Peter Campbell, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University , 3375 SW Terwilliger Blvd, PortlandOR 97239. e-mail: campbelp@ 123456ohsu.edu
                [*]

                RYC and ASC contributed equally to the submitted work.

                Article
                TVST-19-2007
                10.1167/tvst.9.2.14
                7347027
                32704420
                7225606b-b22b-4655-b5ce-bb2e5ab39ac7
                Copyright 2020 The Authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 01 November 2019
                : 31 October 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Special Issue
                Custom metadata
                corrected-proof
                PAP

                deep learning,machine learning,artificial intelligence

                Comments

                Comment on this article