3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recipient and Donor Outcomes After Living-Donor Liver Transplant for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines overall and recurrence-free survival outcomes in adult patients with liver-confined, unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases who underwent a living-donor liver transplant.

          Key Points

          Question

          What are the estimated overall and recurrence-free survival outcomes after living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) in patients with liver-confined, unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM)?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 10 adults with CRLM who received LDLT, Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free and overall survival at a median follow-up of 1.5 years were 62% and 100%, respectively. Perioperative outcomes for both recipients and donors were consistent with established benchmarks.

          Meaning

          The results suggest that LDLT may be a viable treatment option for select patients with unresectable CRLMs with favorable tumor biology.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death, and nearly 70% of patients with this cancer have unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs). Compared with chemotherapy, liver transplant has been reported to improve survival in patients with CRLMs, but in North America, liver allograft shortages make the use of deceased-donor allografts for this indication problematic.

          Objective

          To examine survival outcomes of living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) for unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This prospective cohort study included patients at 3 North American liver transplant centers with established LDLT programs, 2 in the US and 1 in Canada. Patients with liver-confined, unresectable CRLMs who had demonstrated sustained disease control on oncologic therapy met the inclusion criteria for LDLT. Patients included in this study underwent an LDLT between July 2017 and October 2020 and were followed up until May 1, 2021.

          Exposures

          Living-donor liver transplant.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Perioperative morbidity and mortality of treated patients and donors, assessed by univariate statistics, and 1.5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free and overall survival for transplant recipients.

          Results

          Of 91 evaluated patients, 10 (11%) underwent LDLT (6 [60%] male; median age, 45 years [range, 35-58 years]). Among the 10 living donors, 7 (70%) were male, and the median age was 40.5 years (range, 27-50 years). Kaplan-Meier estimates for recurrence-free and overall survival at 1.5 years after LDLT were 62% and 100%, respectively. Perioperative morbidity for both donors and recipients was consistent with established standards (Clavien-Dindo complications among recipients: 3 [10%] had none, 3 [30%] had grade II, and 4 [40%] had grade III; donors: 5 [50%] had none, 4 [40%] had grade I, and 1 had grade III).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This study’s findings of recurrence-free and overall survival rates suggest that select patients with unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs may benefit from total hepatectomy and LDLT.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries

          This article provides a status report on the global burden of cancer worldwide using the GLOBOCAN 2018 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with a focus on geographic variability across 20 world regions. There will be an estimated 18.1 million new cancer cases (17.0 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and 9.6 million cancer deaths (9.5 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) in 2018. In both sexes combined, lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer (11.6% of the total cases) and the leading cause of cancer death (18.4% of the total cancer deaths), closely followed by female breast cancer (11.6%), prostate cancer (7.1%), and colorectal cancer (6.1%) for incidence and colorectal cancer (9.2%), stomach cancer (8.2%), and liver cancer (8.2%) for mortality. Lung cancer is the most frequent cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among males, followed by prostate and colorectal cancer (for incidence) and liver and stomach cancer (for mortality). Among females, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, followed by colorectal and lung cancer (for incidence), and vice versa (for mortality); cervical cancer ranks fourth for both incidence and mortality. The most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, however, substantially vary across countries and within each country depending on the degree of economic development and associated social and life style factors. It is noteworthy that high-quality cancer registry data, the basis for planning and implementing evidence-based cancer control programs, are not available in most low- and middle-income countries. The Global Initiative for Cancer Registry Development is an international partnership that supports better estimation, as well as the collection and use of local data, to prioritize and evaluate national cancer control efforts. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2018;0:1-31. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases.

            There is a need for clearly defined and widely applicable clinical criteria for the selection of patients who may benefit from hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Such criteria would also be useful for stratification of patients in clinical trials for this disease. Clinical, pathologic, and outcome data for 1001 consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer between July 1985 and October 1998 were examined. These resections included 237 trisegmentectomies, 394 lobectomies, and 370 resections encompassing less than a lobe. The surgical mortality rate was 2.8%. The 5-year survival rate was 37%, and the 10-year survival rate was 22%. Seven factors were found to be significant and independent predictors of poor long-term outcome by multivariate analysis: positive margin (p = 0.004), extrahepatic disease (p = 0.003), node-positive primary (p = 0.02), disease-free interval from primary to metastases 1 (p = 0.0004), largest hepatic tumor >5 cm (p = 0.01), and carcinoembryonic antigen level >200 ng/ml (p = 0.01). When the last five of these criteria were used in a preoperative scoring system, assigning one point for each criterion, the total score was highly predictive of outcome (p < 0.0001). No patient with a score of 5 was a long-term survivor. Resection of hepatic colorectal metastases may produce long-term survival and cure. Long-term outcome can be predicted from five criteria that are readily available for all patients considered for resection. Patients with up to two criteria can have a favorable outcome. Patients with three, four, or five criteria should be considered for experimental adjuvant trials. Studies of preoperative staging techniques or of adjuvant therapies should consider using such a score for stratification of patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical Score for Predicting Recurrence After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Surg
                JAMA Surg
                JAMA Surgery
                American Medical Association
                2168-6254
                2168-6262
                30 March 2022
                June 2022
                30 March 2022
                : 157
                : 6
                : 524-530
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
                [2 ]Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
                [3 ]HPB and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
                [6 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: January 9, 2022.
                Published Online: March 30, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0300
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Hernandez-Alejandro R et al. JAMA Surgery.
                Corresponding Author: Gonzalo Sapisochin, MD, PhD, MSc, Abdominal Transplant & HPB Surgical Oncology, Ajmera Transplant Center, Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, 11PMB184, Toronto, M5G 2N2, ON, Canada ( gonzalo.sapisochin@ 123456uhn.ca ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Hernandez-Alejandro and Ruffolo had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Hernandez-Alejandro, Ruffolo, Sasaki, Tomiyama, Dokus, McGilvray, Ghanekar, Gallinger, Burkes, Hashimoto, Fujiki, Quintini, Menon, Aucejo, Sapisochin.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Hernandez-Alejandro, Ruffolo, Sasaki, Tomiyama, Orloff, Pineda-Solis, Nair, Errigo, Dokus, Cattral, Selzner, Claasen, Fujiki, Estfan, Kwon, Sapisochin.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Hernandez-Alejandro, Ruffolo, Sasaki, Errigo, Cattral, Claasen, Menon.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Hernandez-Alejandro, Ruffolo, Sasaki, Tomiyama, Orloff, Pineda-Solis, Nair, Dokus, Cattral, McGilvray, Ghanekar, Gallinger, Selzner, Claasen, Burkes, Hashimoto, Fujiki, Quintini, Estfan, Kwon, Aucejo, Sapisochin.
                Statistical analysis: Hernandez-Alejandro, Ruffolo, Fujiki, Quintini.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Hernandez-Alejandro, Ruffolo, Orloff, Nair, Errigo, Dokus, McGilvray, Ghanekar, Selzner, Claasen, Burkes.
                Supervision: Hernandez-Alejandro, Ruffolo, Sasaki, Tomiyama, Pineda-Solis, Gallinger, Menon, Aucejo, Sapisochin.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kwon reported receiving grants from Medtronic, Integra LifeSciences, Olympus, Fujifilm, and Ethicon outside the submitted work. Dr Sapisochin reported receiving grants from Roche and Bayer and personal fees from Integra, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Novartis outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Article
                soi220010
                10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0300
                8968681
                35353121
                7155bcdf-2dc3-406e-869c-edc632d74714
                Copyright 2022 Hernandez-Alejandro R et al. JAMA Surgery.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 17 September 2021
                : 9 January 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article