3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Effect of Trust on Gaze-Mediated Attentional Orienting

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The last two decades have witnessed growing interest in the study of social cognition and its multiple facets, including trust. Interpersonal trust is generally understood as the belief that others are not likely to harm you. When meeting strangers, judgments of trustworthiness are mostly based on fast evaluation of facial appearance, unless information about past behavior is available. In the past decade, studies have tried to understand the complex relationship between trust and gaze-cueing of attention (GCA) (i.e., attentional orienting following another person’s gaze). This review will focus on the studies that used a gaze-cueing paradigm to explore this relationship. While the predictivity of the gaze-cue seems to consistently influence trustworthiness judgments, the impact of trust on gaze-cueing is less clear. Four studies found enhanced gaze-cueing effects with trustworthy faces; one found stronger effects of gaze-cueing with faces associated with undesirable behavior, but only when the observer’s personal evaluations were taken into account. Four studies did not observe an effect of trust on gaze-cueing. Overall, studies have highlighted the complexity of this relationship, suggesting that multiple factors (including age, gender, the characteristics of the observer, and whether or not a threat is perceived) are likely to intervene in the interplay between trust and gaze-triggered attentional orienting. After discussing results in the context of existing theories of gaze-cueing and trust, we conclude that further investigation is needed to better understand this relationship and the contribution of social factors to attentional shifts guided by gaze.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early social attention impairments in autism: social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress.

          This study investigated social attention impairments in autism (social orienting, joint attention, and attention to another's distress) and their relations to language ability. Three- to four-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD; n = 72), 3- to 4-year-old developmentally delayed children (n = 34), and 12- to 46-month-old typically developing children (n = 39), matched on mental age, were compared on measures of social orienting, joint attention, and attention to another's distress. Children with autism performed significantly worse than the comparison groups in all of these domains. Combined impairments in joint attention and social orienting were found to best distinguish young children with ASD from those without ASD. Structural equation modeling indicated that joint attention was the best predictor of concurrent language ability. Social orienting and attention to distress were indirectly related to language through their relations with joint attention. These results help to clarify the nature of social attention impairments in autism, offer clues to developmental mechanisms, and suggest targets for early intervention. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.

            Schematic threatening, friendly, and neutral faces were used to test the hypothesis that humans preferentially orient their attention toward threat. Using a visual search paradigm, participants searched for discrepant faces in matrices of otherwise identical faces. Across 5 experiments, results consistently showed faster and more accurate detection of threatening than friendly targets. The threat advantage was obvious regardless of whether the conditions favored parallel or serial search (i.e., involved neutral or emotional distractors), and it was valid for inverted faces. Threatening angry faces were more quickly and accurately detected than were other negative faces (sad or "scheming"), which suggests that the threat advantage can be attributed to threat rather than to the negative valence or the uniqueness of the target display.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness After Minimal Time Exposure

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                15 July 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 1554
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Cognition and Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Zayed University , Dubai, United Arab Emirates
                [2] 2Department of Experimental Psychology and Physiology of Behaviour, University of Granada , Granada, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Claudia Scorolli, University of Bologna, Italy

                Reviewed by: Mario Dalmaso, University of Padua, Italy; Kenta Ishikawa, Senshu University, Japan; James Strachan, Central European University, Hungary

                *Correspondence: Mariapaola Barbato, Mariapaola.Barbato@ 123456zu.ac.ae

                This article was submitted to Cognitive Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01554
                7381121
                32765355
                6f87534c-7921-4635-abd2-d6089624bda0
                Copyright © 2020 Barbato, Almulla and Marotta.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 January 2020
                : 10 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 67, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Mini Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                trustworthiness,trust,gaze-cueing,gaze-cueing effect,attentional orienting

                Comments

                Comment on this article