8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community exercise is feasible for neuromuscular diseases and can improve aerobic capacity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The aim of this phase 2 trial was to ascertain the feasibility and effect of community-based aerobic exercise training for people with 2 of the more common neuromuscular diseases: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT) and inclusion body myositis (IBM).

          Methods

          A randomized single-blinded crossover trial design was used to compare a 12-week aerobic training program using recombinant exercise bicycles compared to a control period. The training occurred 3 times per week in community gyms local to the participants. Support was available from trained gym staff and a research physiotherapist. The 2 disease groups were analyzed separately. The primary outcome measure was peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 peak) during a maximal exercise test, with secondary measures of muscle strength, function, and patient-reported measures.

          Results

          Data from 23 people with CMT and 17 people with IBM were included in the analysis. Both disease groups had high levels of participation and demonstrated improvements in VO 2 peak, with a moderate effect size in the CMT participants (Cohen d = 0.53) and a strong effect size in the IBM group (Cohen d = 1.72). No major changes were observed in the secondary outcome measures. Qualitative interviews revealed that participants valued the support of gym instructors and the research physiotherapists in overcoming challenges to participation.

          Conclusion

          Twelve weeks of aerobic training in community gyms was feasible, safe, and improved aerobic capacity in people with CMT and IBM.

          Classification of evidence

          This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with CMT type 1A and IBM, an aerobic training program increases aerobic capacity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Oxygen uptake kinetics.

          Muscular exercise requires transitions to and from metabolic rates often exceeding an order of magnitude above resting and places prodigious demands on the oxidative machinery and O2-transport pathway. The science of kinetics seeks to characterize the dynamic profiles of the respiratory, cardiovascular, and muscular systems and their integration to resolve the essential control mechanisms of muscle energetics and oxidative function: a goal not feasible using the steady-state response. Essential features of the O2 uptake (VO2) kinetics response are highly conserved across the animal kingdom. For a given metabolic demand, fast VO2 kinetics mandates a smaller O2 deficit, less substrate-level phosphorylation and high exercise tolerance. By the same token, slow VO2 kinetics incurs a high O2 deficit, presents a greater challenge to homeostasis and presages poor exercise tolerance. Compelling evidence supports that, in healthy individuals walking, running, or cycling upright, VO2 kinetics control resides within the exercising muscle(s) and is therefore not dependent upon, or limited by, upstream O2-transport systems. However, disease, aging, and other imposed constraints may redistribute VO2 kinetics control more proximally within the O2-transport system. Greater understanding of VO2 kinetics control and, in particular, its relation to the plasticity of the O2-transport/utilization system is considered important for improving the human condition, not just in athletic populations, but crucially for patients suffering from pathologically slowed VO2 kinetics as well as the burgeoning elderly population. © 2012 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 2:933-996, 2012.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reliability and validity of the CMT neuropathy score as a measure of disability.

            To determine the validity and reliability of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) neuropathy score (CMTNS) in patients with inherited neuropathy. Natural history studies and potential treatment trials for patients with various forms of CMT are limited by the lack of quantitative methodologies to monitor disease progression. Most cases of CMT can be considered length-dependent axonal neuropathies because disability for even the demyelinating forms correlates with length-dependent axonal degeneration. The total neuropathy score (TNS) is a validated composite measure of disability in length-dependent axonal neuropathies but is weighted toward predominantly sensory neuropathies. Thus, the authors have devised a CMTNS, modified from the TNS, to provide a single measure to quantify CMT disability. The authors measured inter- and intrainvestigator reliability of the CMTNS and performed a validation of the score with the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS), patient self-assessment scores, an ambulation index, and other measures of disability. Inter- and intrainvestigator reliability was more than 95% in the 60 patients evaluated. Patients could be divided into mild (CMTNS, or =21) categories and demonstrated excellent correlations among all measures of disability. The Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) neuropathy score is a validated measure of length-dependent axonal and demyelinating CMT disability and can be investigated as an end point for longitudinal studies and clinical trials of CMT.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Aerobic training is safe and improves exercise capacity in patients with mitochondrial myopathy.

              Exercise intolerance is a prominent symptom in patients with mitochondrial myopathy (MM), but it is still unsettled whether exercise training is safe and beneficial for patients with MM. To address this, we studied the effect of 12 weeks cycle training on exercise capacity, quality of life and underlying molecular and cellular events in five patients with single large-scale deletions, one with a microdeletion and 14 with point mutations of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and 13 healthy subjects. Each training session lasted 30 min, and was performed at an intensity of 70% of VO2max (maximal oxygen uptake). Each subject performed 50 training sessions in 12 weeks. All subjects were evaluated before and after training, and 13 MM patients were studied after 8 weeks of deconditioning. Evaluation included VO2max and mutation load and mtDNA quantity, mitochondrial enzymatic activity, and number of centrally nucleated, apoptotic, ragged red and cytochrome oxidase (COX)-negative fibres in muscle biopsies from the quadriceps muscle. After 12 weeks of training, VO2max and muscle citrate synthase increased in MM (26 and 67%) and healthy (17 and 65%) subjects, while mtDNA quantity in muscle only increased in the MM patients (81%). In the MM patients, training did not change mtDNA mutation load in muscle, mitochondrial enzyme complex activities, muscle morphology and plasma creatine kinase. After deconditioning, VO2max and citrate synthase activity returned to values before training, while muscle mtDNA mutation load decreased. These findings show that aerobic training efficiently improves oxidative capacity in MM patients. Based on unchanged levels of mutant load in muscle, morphological findings on muscle biopsy and plasma creatine kinase levels during training, the treatment appears to be safe. Regular, supervised aerobic exercise is therefore recommended in MM patients with the studied mutations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neurology
                Neurology
                neurology
                neur
                neurology
                NEUROLOGY
                Neurology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0028-3878
                1526-632X
                09 April 2019
                09 April 2019
                : 92
                : 15
                : e1773-e1785
                Affiliations
                From Queen Square MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Neurology (A.W., A.P., M.D., P.M.M., M.L., I.S., M.S., M.M.R., M.G.H., G.M.R.), Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health (P.H.), and Department of Statistical Science (G.B.), University College London; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (E.D., K.J.), University College Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust; Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education (M.D., G.M.R.), Kingston University/St George's University of London; Department of Psychology (A.S.), University of Surrey, Guildford; Charcot Marie Tooth United Kingdom (K.B.), Registered Charity Number 1112370; and Movelab (M.T.), Newcastle University, UK.
                Author notes
                Correspondence Dr. Ramdharry g.ramdharry@ 123456ucl.ac.uk

                Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

                The Article Processing Charge was funded by Research Councils UK.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8743-8897
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2615-9613
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4490-985X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4314-2570
                Article
                NEUROLOGY2018927400
                10.1212/WNL.0000000000007265
                6511083
                30850441
                6a98c87b-cc23-42dd-a0f6-9fd50867adc8
                Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 August 2018
                : 11 December 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: NIHR
                Award ID: PB-PG-0711-25151
                Funded by: Medical Research Council
                Award ID: MR/K000608/1
                Categories
                20
                181
                185
                242
                Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                ONLINE-ONLY

                Comments

                Comment on this article