Application of resuscitation science to improve patient care and outcomes requires
effective strategies for education and implementation. Systematic reviews suggest
that there are significant opportunities to improve education, enhance individual
and team performance, and avoid delays in implementation of guidelines into practice.
It is within this context that the International Liaison Consensus on Resuscitation
(ILCOR) Education, Implementation, and Teams (EIT) Task Force was established and
addressed 32 worksheet topics. Reviewers selected topics from the 2005 International
Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care
(ECC) Science With Treatment Recommendations
1
and new topics identified by an expert group.
One challenge for the EIT Task Force was extrapolating outcomes from simulation studies
to actual patient outcomes. During the evidence evaluation, if the PICO (Population,
Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) question outcomes were limited to training outcomes
such as improved performance on a manikin or simulator, studies were classified to
a level of evidence (LOE) according to study design (e.g., a randomised controlled
trial [RCT] on a manikin would be LOE 1). Manikin or simulator studies were labeled
as LOE 5 irrespective of the study design if the PICO question also included patient
outcomes.
The following is a summary of key 2010 recommendations or changes related to EIT:
•
Efforts to implement new resuscitation guidelines are likely to be more successful
if a carefully planned, multifaceted implementation strategy is used. Education, while
essential, is only one element of a comprehensive implementation strategy.
•
All courses should be evaluated to ensure that they reliably achieve the program objectives.
Training should aim to ensure that learners acquire and retain the skills and knowledge
that will enable them to act correctly in actual cardiac arrests.
•
Life support knowledge and skills, both basic and advanced, can deteriorate in as
little as 3–6 months. Frequent assessments and, when needed, refresher training are
recommended to maintain knowledge and skills.
•
Short video/computer self-instruction courses with minimal or no instructor coaching,
combined with hands-on practice (practice-while-you-watch), can be considered as an
effective alternative to instructor-led basic life support (cardiopulmonary resuscitation
[CPR] and automated external defibrillator [AED]) courses.
•
Laypeople and healthcare providers (HCPs) should be trained to start CPR with chest
compressions for adult victims of cardiac arrest. If they are trained to do so, they
should perform ventilations. Performing chest compressions alone is reasonable for
trained individuals if they are incapable of delivering airway and breathing maneuvers
to cardiac arrest victims.
•
AED use should not be restricted to trained personnel. Allowing use of AEDs by individuals
without prior formal training can be beneficial and may be lifesaving. Since even
brief training improves performance (e.g., speed of use, correct pad placement), it
is recommended that training in the use of AEDs be provided.
•
CPR prompt or feedback devices improve CPR skill acquisition and retention and may
be considered during CPR training for laypeople and healthcare professionals. These
devices may be considered for clinical use as part of an overall strategy to improve
the quality of CPR.
•
It is reasonable to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) (e.g., gloves) when performing
CPR. CPR should not be delayed or withheld if PPE is not available unless there is
a clear risk to the rescuer.
•
Manual chest compressions should not continue during the delivery of a shock because
safety has not been established.
Several important knowledge gaps were identified during the evidence review process:
•
The optimal duration and type of initial training to acquire resuscitation knowledge
and skills.
•
The optimal frequency and type of refresher training required to maintain resuscitation
knowledge and skills.
•
The optimal use of assessment as a tool to promote the learning of resuscitation knowledge
and skills.
•
The impact of experience in actual resuscitation attempts on skill decay and the need
for refresher training.
•
The impact of specific training interventions on patient outcomes.
•
A standardised nomenclature and definitions for different types of simulation training
and terms such as ‘high fidelity simulation,’ ‘feedback,’ ‘briefing’ and ‘debriefing.’
•
The most effective and efficient methods of disseminating information about new resuscitation
interventions or guidelines to reduce time to implementation.
•
For cardiac resuscitation centres (facilities providing a comprehensive package of
post resuscitation care), the optimal emergency medical services (EMS) system characteristics,
safe patient transport interval (time taken to travel from scene to hospital), optimal
mode of transport (e.g., ground ambulance, helicopter), and role of secondary transport
(transfer from receiving hospital to a resuscitation centre).
The EIT Task Force organised its work into five major sections:
•
Education—including who should be trained and how to prepare for training, the use
of specific instructional strategies and techniques, retraining intervals, retention
of knowledge and skills, and assessment methods.
•
Risks and effects on the rescuer of CPR training and actual CPR performance.
•
Rescuer willingness to respond.
•
Implementation and teams—including a framework for implementation efforts as well
as individual and team factors associated with success.
•
Ethics and outcomes.
Education
Effective and efficient resuscitation education is one of the essential elements in
the translation of guidelines into clinical practice. Educational interventions need
to be population specific (e.g., lay rescuers, HCPs) and evaluated to ensure that
they achieve the desired educational outcomes—not just at the end of the course but
also during actual resuscitation events. Retention of knowledge and skills should
be confirmed through assessment and not be assumed to persist for pre-established
time intervals.
Populations
Who should be trained and how should they prepare for training?
Focused training
EIT-012A
,
EIT-012B
For lay providers requiring basic life support training, does focusing training on
high-risk populations, compared with no such targeting improve outcomes (e.g., bystander
CPR, survival)?
Consensus on science
In three studies (LOE 1
2
; LOE 23, 4), people reported that they would be more willing to perform bystander
CPR on family members than on nonrelatives.
One LOE 2 study
5
of people who called 911 found that unless family members had received CPR training,
they were less likely to perform CPR than unrelated bystanders. Computer modeling
(LOE 5)
6
suggested that very large numbers of older adults would need to be trained to achieve
a sufficient increase in private residence bystander CPR rates to improve survival.
Twelve studies (LOE 12, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; LOE 23, 12; LOE 413, 14; LOE 515, 16) reported
that training of patients and family members in CPR provided psychological benefit.
Two LOE 1 studies7, 17 reported that negative psychological effects on patients can
be avoided by providing social support.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of training interventions
that focus on high-risk populations. Training with social support reduces family member
and patient anxiety, improves emotional adjustment, and increases feelings of empowerment.
Focused trainingEIT-012A, EIT-012B
EIT-012A
EIT-012B
For lay providers requiring basic life support training, does focusing training on
high-risk populations, compared with no such targeting improve outcomes (e.g., bystander
CPR, survival)?
Consensus on science
In three studies (LOE 1
2
; LOE 23, 4), people reported that they would be more willing to perform bystander
CPR on family members than on nonrelatives.
One LOE 2 study
5
of people who called 911 found that unless family members had received CPR training,
they were less likely to perform CPR than unrelated bystanders. Computer modeling
(LOE 5)
6
suggested that very large numbers of older adults would need to be trained to achieve
a sufficient increase in private residence bystander CPR rates to improve survival.
Twelve studies (LOE 12, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; LOE 23, 12; LOE 413, 14; LOE 515, 16) reported
that training of patients and family members in CPR provided psychological benefit.
Two LOE 1 studies7, 17 reported that negative psychological effects on patients can
be avoided by providing social support.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of training interventions
that focus on high-risk populations. Training with social support reduces family member
and patient anxiety, improves emotional adjustment, and increases feelings of empowerment.
Precourse preparation
EIT-018A
For advanced life support providers undergoing advanced life support courses, does
the inclusion of specific precourse preparation (e.g., e-learning and pretesting),
as opposed to no such preparation, improve outcomes (e.g., same skill assessment but
with less face-to-face [instructor] hands-on training)?
Consensus on science
Eight studies (LOE 1
18
; LOE 4
19
; LOE 520, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25) reported that a diverse range of precourse preparatory
actions (e.g., computer-assisted learning, pretests, video-based learning, textbook
reading) improved learner outcomes in advanced life support courses.
One large LOE 1 RCT
26
of use of a commercially available e-learning simulation program before attending
an advanced life support course, compared with standard preparation with a course
manual, did not improve either cognitive or psychomotor skill performance during cardiac
arrest simulation testing.
Eighteen studies (LOE 2
27
; LOE 419, 28; LOE 520, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41) showed
that alternative course delivery formats such as electronically delivered (CD or Internet-based)
courses produced as good or better learner outcomes compared with traditional courses,
and also reduced instructor-to-learner face-to-face time.
Treatment recommendation
Precourse preparation including, but not limited to, use of computer-assisted learning
tutorials, written self-instruction materials, video-based learning, textbook reading,
and pretests are recommended as part of advanced life support courses. Any method
of precourse preparation that is aimed at improving knowledge and skills or reducing
instructor-to-learner face-to-face time should be formally assessed to ensure equivalent
or improved learning outcomes compared with standard instructor-led courses.
Precourse preparationEIT-018A
EIT-018A
For advanced life support providers undergoing advanced life support courses, does
the inclusion of specific precourse preparation (e.g., e-learning and pretesting),
as opposed to no such preparation, improve outcomes (e.g., same skill assessment but
with less face-to-face [instructor] hands-on training)?
Consensus on science
Eight studies (LOE 1
18
; LOE 4
19
; LOE 520, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25) reported that a diverse range of precourse preparatory
actions (e.g., computer-assisted learning, pretests, video-based learning, textbook
reading) improved learner outcomes in advanced life support courses.
One large LOE 1 RCT
26
of use of a commercially available e-learning simulation program before attending
an advanced life support course, compared with standard preparation with a course
manual, did not improve either cognitive or psychomotor skill performance during cardiac
arrest simulation testing.
Eighteen studies (LOE 2
27
; LOE 419, 28; LOE 520, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41) showed
that alternative course delivery formats such as electronically delivered (CD or Internet-based)
courses produced as good or better learner outcomes compared with traditional courses,
and also reduced instructor-to-learner face-to-face time.
Treatment recommendation
Precourse preparation including, but not limited to, use of computer-assisted learning
tutorials, written self-instruction materials, video-based learning, textbook reading,
and pretests are recommended as part of advanced life support courses. Any method
of precourse preparation that is aimed at improving knowledge and skills or reducing
instructor-to-learner face-to-face time should be formally assessed to ensure equivalent
or improved learning outcomes compared with standard instructor-led courses.
Instructional methods
There are multiple methods to deliver course content. This section examines specific
instructional methods and strategies that may have an impact on course outcomes.
Alternative instructor methods
EIT-002A
,
EIT-002B
For lay rescuers and HCPs, does the use of specific instructional methods (video/computer
self-instruction), compared with traditional instructor-led courses, improve skill
acquisition and retention?
Consensus on science
Twelve studies (LOE 142, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47; LOE 2 or 348, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53) demonstrated
that basic life support skills can be acquired and retained at least as well and,
in some cases, better using video-based self-instruction (practice-while-you-watch)
compared with traditional instructor-led courses. Video-based self-instruction lasted
from 8 to 34 min, whereas instructor-led courses were usually 4–6 h in duration. One
LOE 1 study
54
demonstrated that prior viewing of a video on infant CPR before an instructor-led
course improved skill acquisition.
When compared with traditional instructor-led CPR courses, various self-instructional
and shortened programs have been demonstrated to be efficient (from the perspective
of time) and effective (from the perspective of skill acquisition) in teaching CPR
skills to various populations.
Treatment recommendation
Short video/computer self-instruction (with minimal or no instructor coaching) that
includes synchronous hands-on practice (practice-while-you-watch) in basic life support
can be considered as an effective alternative to instructor-led courses.
Alternative instructor methodsEIT-002A, EIT-002B
EIT-002A
EIT-002B
For lay rescuers and HCPs, does the use of specific instructional methods (video/computer
self-instruction), compared with traditional instructor-led courses, improve skill
acquisition and retention?
Consensus on science
Twelve studies (LOE 142, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47; LOE 2 or 348, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53) demonstrated
that basic life support skills can be acquired and retained at least as well and,
in some cases, better using video-based self-instruction (practice-while-you-watch)
compared with traditional instructor-led courses. Video-based self-instruction lasted
from 8 to 34 min, whereas instructor-led courses were usually 4–6 h in duration. One
LOE 1 study
54
demonstrated that prior viewing of a video on infant CPR before an instructor-led
course improved skill acquisition.
When compared with traditional instructor-led CPR courses, various self-instructional
and shortened programs have been demonstrated to be efficient (from the perspective
of time) and effective (from the perspective of skill acquisition) in teaching CPR
skills to various populations.
Treatment recommendation
Short video/computer self-instruction (with minimal or no instructor coaching) that
includes synchronous hands-on practice (practice-while-you-watch) in basic life support
can be considered as an effective alternative to instructor-led courses.
AED training interventions
>EIT-013A
,
EIT-013B
For basic life support providers (lay or HCP) requiring AED training, are there any
specific training interventions, compared with traditional lecture/practice sessions,
that increase outcomes (e.g., skill acquisition and retention, actual AED use)?
Consensus on science
One LOE 2 study
55
demonstrated that training delivered by laypeople is as effective as training by HCPs.
One LOE 1 study
56
reported that instruction by nurses, as compared with physicians, resulted in better
skill acquisition. Four studies (LOE 246, 51, 57; LOE 4
58
) reported that the use of computer-based AED training improved skill acquisition
and retention, particularly when combined with manikin practice. One LOE 1 study
47
supported the use of video-self instruction when compared with instructor-led training.
Three LOE 1 studies59, 60, 61 showed that the use of video self-instruction was less
effective for some elements when compared with instructor-led training. One LOE 1
study
62
supported the use of a training poster and manikin for learning AED skills. Three
studies (LOE 246, 63; LOE 4
64
) reported that laypeople and HCPs could use an AED without training. Three LOE 2
studies65, 66, 67 reported that untrained individuals could deliver a shock with an
AED. However, even minimal training (15-min lecture, 1-h lecture with manikin practice,
or reading instructions) improved performance (e.g., time to shock delivery, correct
pad placement, safety).
Treatment recommendation
AED use should not be restricted to trained personnel. Allowing use of AEDs by individuals
without prior formal training can be beneficial and may be lifesaving. Since even
brief training improves performance (e.g., speed of use, correct pad placement), it
is recommended that training in the use of AEDs be provided. Laypeople can be used
as AED instructors. Short video/computer self-instruction (with minimal or no instructor
coaching) that includes synchronous hands-on practice in AED use (practice-while-you-watch)
may be considered as an effective alternative to instructor-led AED courses.
AED training interventionsEIT-013A, EIT-013B
EIT-013A
EIT-013B
For basic life support providers (lay or HCP) requiring AED training, are there any
specific training interventions, compared with traditional lecture/practice sessions,
that increase outcomes (e.g., skill acquisition and retention, actual AED use)?
Consensus on science
One LOE 2 study
55
demonstrated that training delivered by laypeople is as effective as training by HCPs.
One LOE 1 study
56
reported that instruction by nurses, as compared with physicians, resulted in better
skill acquisition. Four studies (LOE 246, 51, 57; LOE 4
58
) reported that the use of computer-based AED training improved skill acquisition
and retention, particularly when combined with manikin practice. One LOE 1 study
47
supported the use of video-self instruction when compared with instructor-led training.
Three LOE 1 studies59, 60, 61 showed that the use of video self-instruction was less
effective for some elements when compared with instructor-led training. One LOE 1
study
62
supported the use of a training poster and manikin for learning AED skills. Three
studies (LOE 246, 63; LOE 4
64
) reported that laypeople and HCPs could use an AED without training. Three LOE 2
studies65, 66, 67 reported that untrained individuals could deliver a shock with an
AED. However, even minimal training (15-min lecture, 1-h lecture with manikin practice,
or reading instructions) improved performance (e.g., time to shock delivery, correct
pad placement, safety).
Treatment recommendation
AED use should not be restricted to trained personnel. Allowing use of AEDs by individuals
without prior formal training can be beneficial and may be lifesaving. Since even
brief training improves performance (e.g., speed of use, correct pad placement), it
is recommended that training in the use of AEDs be provided.
Laypeople can be used as AED instructors
Short video/computer self-instruction (with minimal or no instructor coaching) that
includes synchronous hands-on practice in AED use (practice-while-you-watch) may be
considered as an effective alternative to instructor-led AED courses.
Advanced life support leadership/team training
EIT-017A
For advanced life support providers undergoing advanced life support courses, does
the inclusion of specific leadership/team training, as opposed to no such specific
training, improve outcomes (e.g., performance during cardiac arrest)?
Consensus on science
Four studies (LOE 168, 69; LOE 270, 71) of advanced life support in simulated in-hospital
cardiac arrest and seven LOE 5 studies72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78 of actual and simulated
arrest demonstrated improved resuscitation team performance when specific team and/or
leadership training was added to advanced life support courses.
Treatment recommendation
Specific teamwork training, including leadership skills, should be included in advanced
life support courses.
Advanced life support leadership/team trainingEIT-017A
EIT-017A
For advanced life support providers undergoing advanced life support courses, does
the inclusion of specific leadership/team training, as opposed to no such specific
training, improve outcomes (e.g., performance during cardiac arrest)?
Consensus on science
Four studies (LOE 168, 69; LOE 270, 71) of advanced life support in simulated in-hospital
cardiac arrest and seven LOE 5 studies72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78 of actual and simulated
arrest demonstrated improved resuscitation team performance when specific team and/or
leadership training was added to advanced life support courses.
Treatment recommendation
Specific teamwork training, including leadership skills, should be included in advanced
life support courses.
Teaching chest compressions to achieve recoil
EIT-032
Is there a method for teaching chest compressions, compared with current teaching,
to achieve full chest recoil (complete release) after each compression?
Consensus on science
One LOE 5 clinical case series
79
documented a 46% incidence of incomplete chest recoil by professional rescuers using
the 2005-recommended CPR technique. One LOE 4 study
80
electronically recorded chest recoil during in-hospital paediatric cardiac arrests,
and found that leaning on the chest (>2.5 kg; an adult feedback threshold) occurred
in 50% of chest compressions/decompressions using the recommended hand position, and
that incomplete recoil was reduced with real-time automated feedback. Another LOE
4 in-hospital paediatric study
81
demonstrated a 23.4% incidence of incomplete recoil. One LOE 5 study
82
has shown that without specific training in complete chest recoil technique, 22% of
trained rescuers leaned on the chest when performing CPR. Two LOE 5 studies79, 83
demonstrated that incomplete chest recoil was significantly reduced with three techniques
(i.e., ‘two-finger fulcrum,’ ‘five-finger fulcrum,’ and ‘hands-off’) of lifting the
heel of the hand slightly but completely off the chest during CPR in a manikin model.
However, duty cycle and compression depth were reduced when professional and lay rescuers
applied these techniques.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to recommend teaching any specific technique to optimise
complete chest recoil during actual CPR.
Teaching chest compressions to achieve recoilEIT-032
EIT-032
Is there a method for teaching chest compressions, compared with current teaching,
to achieve full chest recoil (complete release) after each compression?
Consensus on science
One LOE 5 clinical case series
79
documented a 46% incidence of incomplete chest recoil by professional rescuers using
the 2005-recommended CPR technique. One LOE 4 study
80
electronically recorded chest recoil during in-hospital paediatric cardiac arrests,
and found that leaning on the chest (>2.5 kg; an adult feedback threshold) occurred
in 50% of chest compressions/decompressions using the recommended hand position, and
that incomplete recoil was reduced with real-time automated feedback. Another LOE
4 in-hospital paediatric study
81
demonstrated a 23.4% incidence of incomplete recoil. One LOE 5 study
82
has shown that without specific training in complete chest recoil technique, 22% of
trained rescuers leaned on the chest when performing CPR. Two LOE 5 studies79, 83
demonstrated that incomplete chest recoil was significantly reduced with three techniques
(i.e., ‘two-finger fulcrum,’ ‘five-finger fulcrum,’ and ‘hands-off’) of lifting the
heel of the hand slightly but completely off the chest during CPR in a manikin model.
However, duty cycle and compression depth were reduced when professional and lay rescuers
applied these techniques.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to recommend teaching any specific technique to optimise
complete chest recoil during actual CPR.
Use of CPR prompt/feedback devices
EIT-005A
,
EIT-005B
For lay rescuers and HCPs performing CPR, does the use of CPR prompt/feedback devices,
compared with no device, improve acquisition, retention, and actual performance of
CPR skills?
Consensus on science
Most devices considered in this review combine prompting (a signal to perform an action,
e.g., metronome for compression rate) with feedback (after-event information about
the effect of an action, e.g., visual display of compression depth). The effects have
been considered together in this question and devices are referred to as prompt/feedback
devices.
Seven LOE 5 manikin studies84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 demonstrated that CPR prompt/feedback
devices either in addition to or in place of instructor-led training improved basic
CPR skill acquisition (tested without use of the device). Another LOE 5 manikin study
85
showed that automated feedback might be less effective than instructor feedback for
more complex skills (e.g., bag-mask ventilation).
Two LOE 5 manikin studies84, 87 showed improved skill retention when a CPR prompt/feedback
device was used during initial training. An additional LOE 5 manikin study
89
showed that unsupervised refresher training with a CPR prompt/feedback device, compared
with no refresher training, also improved skill retention. The LOE 5 follow-up arm
of the manikin study of bag-mask ventilation/CPR
85
continued to show poorer ventilation skills in the voice-activated manikin-feedback
arm compared with the instructor-feedback arm.
Evidence from 21 manikin studies (LOE 5)84, 86, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97,
98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 consistently demonstrated that CPR
prompt/feedback devices used during CPR improved the quality of CPR performance on
manikins. Three additional manikin studies (LOE 5) examined the utility of video/animations
on mobile-phone devices: two studies showed improved checklist scores and quality
of CPR92, 95 and faster initiation of CPR,
92
while the third study showed that participants using multimedia phone CPR instruction
took longer to complete tasks than dispatcher-assisted CPR.
103
Two manikin studies (LOE 5)108, 109 that used two-way video communication to enable
the dispatcher to review and comment on CPR in real time produced equivocal findings.
There are no studies demonstrating improved patient outcomes with CPR prompt/feedback
devices. One study each in children (LOE 2)
110
and adults (LOE 2)
111
showed that metronomes improved chest compression rate and increased end-tidal carbon
dioxide (thought to correlate with improved cardiac output and blood flow to the lungs).
Five studies evaluating the introduction of CPR prompt/feedback devices in clinical
practice (pre/post comparisons) found improved CPR performance (LOE 3)80, 112, 113,
114, 115.
There may be some limitations to the use of CPR prompt/feedback devices. Two LOE 5
manikin studies116, 117 reported that chest-compression devices may overestimate compression
depth if CPR is being performed on a compressible surface such as a mattress on a
bed. One LOE 5 study
100
reported harm to a single participant when a hand got stuck in moving parts of the
CPR feedback device. Another LOE 5 manikin study
118
demonstrated that additional mechanical work from the CPR provider was required to
compress the spring in one of the pressure-sensing feedback devices. One case report
(LOE 5)
119
documented soft tissue injury to a patient's chest when an accelerometer device was
used for prolonged CPR.
Treatment recommendation
CPR prompt/feedback devices may be considered during CPR training for laypeople and
HCPs. CPR prompt/feedback devices may be considered for clinical use as part of an
overall strategy to improve the quality of CPR. Instructors and rescuers should be
made aware that a compressible support surface (e.g., mattress) may cause a feedback
device to overestimate depth of compression.
Use of CPR prompt/feedback devicesEIT-005A, EIT-005B
EIT-005A
EIT-005B
For lay rescuers and HCPs performing CPR, does the use of CPR prompt/feedback devices,
compared with no device, improve acquisition, retention, and actual performance of
CPR skills?
Consensus on science
Most devices considered in this review combine prompting (a signal to perform an action,
e.g., metronome for compression rate) with feedback (after-event information about
the effect of an action, e.g., visual display of compression depth). The effects have
been considered together in this question and devices are referred to as prompt/feedback
devices.
Seven LOE 5 manikin studies84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 demonstrated that CPR prompt/feedback
devices either in addition to or in place of instructor-led training improved basic
CPR skill acquisition (tested without use of the device). Another LOE 5 manikin study
85
showed that automated feedback might be less effective than instructor feedback for
more complex skills (e.g., bag-mask ventilation).
Two LOE 5 manikin studies84, 87 showed improved skill retention when a CPR prompt/feedback
device was used during initial training. An additional LOE 5 manikin study
89
showed that unsupervised refresher training with a CPR prompt/feedback device, compared
with no refresher training, also improved skill retention. The LOE 5 follow-up arm
of the manikin study of bag-mask ventilation/CPR
85
continued to show poorer ventilation skills in the voice-activated manikin–feedback
arm compared with the instructor-feedback arm.
Evidence from 21 manikin studies (LOE 5)84, 86, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97,
98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 consistently demonstrated that CPR
prompt/feedback devices used during CPR improved the quality of CPR performance on
manikins. Three additional manikin studies (LOE 5) examined the utility of video/animations
on mobile-phone devices: two studies showed improved checklist scores and quality
of CPR92, 95 and faster initiation of CPR,
92
while the third study showed that participants using multimedia phone CPR instruction
took longer to complete tasks than dispatcher-assisted CPR.
103
Two manikin studies (LOE 5)108, 109 that used two-way video communication to enable
the dispatcher to review and comment on CPR in real time produced equivocal findings.
There are no studies demonstrating improved patient outcomes with CPR prompt/feedback
devices. One study each in children (LOE 2)
110
and adults (LOE 2)
111
showed that metronomes improved chest compression rate and increased end-tidal carbon
dioxide (thought to correlate with improved cardiac output and blood flow to the lungs).
Five studies evaluating the introduction of CPR prompt/feedback devices in clinical
practice (pre/post comparisons) found improved CPR performance (LOE 3)80, 112, 113,
114, 115.
There may be some limitations to the use of CPR prompt/feedback devices. Two LOE 5
manikin studies116, 117 reported that chest-compression devices may overestimate compression
depth if CPR is being performed on a compressible surface such as a mattress on a
bed. One LOE 5 study
100
reported harm to a single participant when a hand got stuck in moving parts of the
CPR feedback device. Another LOE 5 manikin study
118
demonstrated that additional mechanical work from the CPR provider was required to
compress the spring in one of the pressure-sensing feedback devices. One case report
(LOE 5)
119
documented soft tissue injury to a patient's chest when an accelerometer device was
used for prolonged CPR.
Treatment recommendation
CPR prompt/feedback devices may be considered during CPR training for laypeople and
HCPs. CPR prompt/feedback devices may be considered for clinical use as part of an
overall strategy to improve the quality of CPR. Instructors and rescuers should be
made aware that a compressible support surface (e.g., mattress) may cause a feedback
device to overestimate depth of compression.
Training interventions
EIT-009A
For adult and paediatric advanced life support providers, are there any specific training
interventions (e.g., duration of session, interactive computer programs, e-learning,
video self-instruction) compared with traditional lecture/practice sessions that increase
outcomes (e.g., skill acquisition and retention)?
Consensus on science
There is limited evidence about interventions that enhance learning and retention
from advanced life support courses. One LOE 3 study
120
suggested that the 2005 Guidelines have helped to improve “no-flow” fraction (i.e.,
percent of total resuscitation time that compressions are not performed) but not other
elements of quality of CPR performance. One LOE 1 study
121
demonstrated that clinical training before an advanced life support (ALS) course might
improve long-term retention of ALS knowledge and skills. One LOE 5 advanced trauma
life support (ATLS) study
122
suggested that postcourse experience might play a role in knowledge and skill retention.
In one LOE 3 study
123
unscheduled mock-codes improved mock-code performance in hospital personnel. One LOE
2 study
124
found no difference in knowledge retention when live actors were used in ALS course
training compared with manikins.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to recommend any specific training intervention, compared
with traditional lecture/practice sessions, to improve learning, retention, and use
of advanced life support skills.
Training interventionsEIT-009A
EIT-009A
For adult and paediatric advanced life support providers, are there any specific training
interventions (e.g., duration of session, interactive computer programs, e-learning,
video self-instruction) compared with traditional lecture/practice sessions that increase
outcomes (e.g., skill acquisition and retention)?
Consensus on science
There is limited evidence about interventions that enhance learning and retention
from advanced life support courses. One LOE 3 study
120
suggested that the 2005 Guidelines have helped to improve “no-flow” fraction (i.e.,
percent of total resuscitation time that compressions are not performed) but not other
elements of quality of CPR performance. One LOE 1 study
121
demonstrated that clinical training before an advanced life support (ALS) course might
improve long-term retention of ALS knowledge and skills. One LOE 5 advanced trauma
life support (ATLS) study
122
suggested that postcourse experience might play a role in knowledge and skill retention.
In one LOE 3 study
123
unscheduled mock-codes improved mock-code performance in hospital personnel. One LOE
2 study
124
found no difference in knowledge retention when live actors were used in ALS course
training compared with manikins.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to recommend any specific training intervention, compared
with traditional lecture/practice sessions, to improve learning, retention, and use
of advanced life support skills.
Realistic training techniques
EIT-019A
,
EIT-019B
For participants undergoing basic or advanced life support courses, does the inclusion
of more realistic techniques (e.g., high-fidelity manikins, in situ training), as
opposed to standard training (e.g., low-fidelity manikins, education centre), improve
outcomes (e.g., skill performance on manikins, skill performance in an actual arrest,
willingness to perform)?
Consensus on science
Studies report conflicting data on the effect of increasing realism (e.g., use of
actual resuscitation settings, high-fidelity manikins) on learning, and few data on
patient outcomes. Two studies (LOE 1
125
; LOE 2
126
) supported an improvement in performance of skills in actual arrest, but were underpowered
to identify improved survival rate. One small LOE 1 study
127
showed no overall effect on performance, although the simulation-trained group demonstrated
superior teamwork skills. Thirteen studies (LOE 1125, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132; LOE
2133, 134, 135; LOE 3136, 137; LOE 4138, 139) reported an improvement in skills assessed
using a manikin. Seven LOE 1 studies140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 reported no
effect on skills assessed using a manikin. Eleven LOE 1 studies tested the effect
of simulation fidelity on the participants’ knowledge using multiple-choice questions;
nine of these studies found no effect124, 127, 128, 130, 140, 141, 143, 144, 147 and
two of the 11 studies demonstrated an improvement in participant knowledge with the
more realistic techniques.148, 149
Two studies (LOE 3
136
; LOE 4
138
) that focused on resuscitation in trauma reported improved skill performance (on
a manikin) with higher-fidelity simulation. One LOE 1 study
140
found no difference in skill performance or knowledge in advanced trauma life support
(ATLS) with the use of high-fidelity simulation. One LOE 1 study
148
reported a significant increase in knowledge when using manikins or live patient models
for trauma teaching compared with no manikins or no live models. In this study there
was no difference in knowledge acquisition between using manikins or live patient
models, although learners preferred using the manikins.
Four studies (LOE 1128, 140, 141; LOE 2
148
) reported that higher fidelity simulation was associated with improved learner satisfaction
rate compared with a traditional curriculum. One LOE 1 study
144
questioned the cost-effectiveness of higher fidelity approaches compared with standard
manikins.
Three studies (LOE 1
125
; LOE 2
134
; LOE 3
137
) reported that requiring learners to perform all of the steps of psychomotor skills
in simulation as they would in an actual clinical situation could reveal inadequacies
in training.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of more realistic techniques
(e.g., high-fidelity manikins, in situ training) to improve outcomes (e.g., skill
performance on manikins, skill performance in actual arrest, willingness to perform)
compared with standard training (e.g., low-fidelity manikins, education centre) in
basic and advanced life support courses.
Realistic training techniquesEIT-019A, EIT-019B
EIT-019A
EIT-019B
For participants undergoing basic or advanced life support courses, does the inclusion
of more realistic techniques (e.g., high-fidelity manikins, in situ training), as
opposed to standard training (e.g., low-fidelity manikins, education centre), improve
outcomes (e.g., skill performance on manikins, skill performance in an actual arrest,
willingness to perform)?
Consensus on science
Studies report conflicting data on the effect of increasing realism (e.g., use of
actual resuscitation settings, high-fidelity manikins) on learning, and few data on
patient outcomes. Two studies (LOE 1
125
; LOE 2
126
) supported an improvement in performance of skills in actual arrest, but were underpowered
to identify improved survival rate. One small LOE 1 study
127
showed no overall effect on performance, although the simulation-trained group demonstrated
superior teamwork skills. Thirteen studies (LOE 1125, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132; LOE
2133, 134, 135; LOE 3136, 137; LOE 4138, 139) reported an improvement in skills assessed
using a manikin. Seven LOE 1 studies140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 reported no
effect on skills assessed using a manikin. Eleven LOE 1 studies tested the effect
of simulation fidelity on the participants’ knowledge using multiple-choice questions;
nine of these studies found no effect124, 127, 128, 130, 140, 141, 143, 144, 147 and
two of the 11 studies demonstrated an improvement in participant knowledge with the
more realistic techniques.148, 149
Two studies (LOE 3
136
; LOE 4
138
) that focused on resuscitation in trauma reported improved skill performance (on
a manikin) with higher-fidelity simulation. One LOE 1 study
140
found no difference in skill performance or knowledge in advanced trauma life support
(ATLS) with the use of high-fidelity simulation. One LOE 1 study
148
reported a significant increase in knowledge when using manikins or live patient models
for trauma teaching compared with no manikins or no live models. In this study there
was no difference in knowledge acquisition between using manikins or live patient
models, although learners preferred using the manikins.
Four studies (LOE 1128, 140, 141; LOE 2
148
) reported that higher fidelity simulation was associated with improved learner satisfaction
rate compared with a traditional curriculum. One LOE 1 study
144
questioned the cost-effectiveness of higher fidelity approaches compared with standard
manikins.
Three studies (LOE 1
125
; LOE 2
134
; LOE 3
137
) reported that requiring learners to perform all of the steps of psychomotor skills
in simulation as they would in an actual clinical situation could reveal inadequacies
in training.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of more realistic techniques
(e.g., high-fidelity manikins, in situ training) to improve outcomes (e.g., skill
performance on manikins, skill performance in actual arrest, willingness to perform)
compared with standard training (e.g., low-fidelity manikins, education centre) in
basic and advanced life support courses.
Course format and duration
Resuscitation training courses vary widely in their duration and how different elements
of the curriculum are taught. This section examines the effect of course format and
duration on learning outcomes.
Course duration
EIT-029A
,
EIT-029B
For basic life support providers (lay or HCP), does a longer duration instructor-led
course, compared with a shorter course, improve skill acquisition and retention?
Consensus on science
A single, randomised manikin LOE 1 study
150
demonstrated that a 7-h basic life support (with AED) instructor-led course resulted
in better initial skill acquisition than a 4-h instructor-led course; and a 4-h instructor-led
course resulted in better skill acquisition than a 2-h course. Retesting at 6 months
after a 2-h course resulted in skill retention at 12 months that was equivalent to
a 7-h course with no intermediate testing. This study
150
along with two LOE 2 manikin studies151, 152 demonstrated that for periods between
4 and 12 months, skill retention is higher for longer courses, but deterioration is
at similar rates. The differences in learning outcomes for courses of different durations
may not be significant, particularly if assessment and refresher training are undertaken.
Treatment recommendation
It is reasonable to consider shortening the duration of traditional instructor-led
basic life support courses. Brief reassessment (e.g., at 6 months) should be considered
to improve skills and retention. The optimal duration of an instructor-led basic life
support course has not been determined. New course formats should be assessed to ensure
that they achieve their objectives.
Course durationEIT-029A, EIT-029B
EIT-029A
EIT-029B
For basic life support providers (lay or HCP), does a longer duration instructor-led
course, compared with a shorter course, improve skill acquisition and retention?
Consensus on Science
A single, randomised manikin LOE 1 study
150
demonstrated that a 7-h basic life support (with AED) instructor-led course resulted
in better initial skill acquisition than a 4-h instructor-led course; and a 4-h instructor-led
course resulted in better skill acquisition than a 2-h course. Retesting at 6 months
after a 2-h course resulted in skill retention at 12 months that was equivalent to
a 7-h course with no intermediate testing. This study
150
along with two LOE 2 manikin studies151, 152 demonstrated that for periods between
4 and 12 months, skill retention is higher for longer courses, but deterioration is
at similar rates. The differences in learning outcomes for courses of different durations
may not be significant, particularly if assessment and refresher training are undertaken.
Treatment recommendation
It is reasonable to consider shortening the duration of traditional instructor-led
basic life support courses. Brief reassessment (e.g., at 6 months) should be considered
to improve skills and retention. The optimal duration of an instructor-led basic life
support course has not been determined. New course formats should be assessed to ensure
that they achieve their objectives.
Nontraditional scheduling formats
EIT-020
For participants undergoing advanced life support courses, does the use of nontraditional
scheduling formats such as random scheduling (introducing station cases in a random
manner) or modular courses, as opposed to traditional scheduling, improve outcomes
(e.g., skills performance)?
Consensus on science
There are no published studies addressing the impact of different ALS course scheduling
formats, compared with the traditional 2-day course format, that demonstrated improved
learning outcomes (knowledge and skill acquisition and/or retention).
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of alternative advanced
life support course scheduling formats compared with the traditional 2-day course
format.
Nontraditional scheduling formatsEIT-020
EIT-020
For participants undergoing advanced life support courses, does the use of nontraditional
scheduling formats such as random scheduling (introducing station cases in a random
manner) or modular courses, as opposed to traditional scheduling, improve outcomes
(e.g., skills performance)?
Consensus on science
There are no published studies addressing the impact of different ALS course scheduling
formats, compared with the traditional 2-day course format, that demonstrated improved
learning outcomes (knowledge and skill acquisition and/or retention).
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of alternative advanced
life support course scheduling formats compared with the traditional 2-day course
format.
Retraining intervals
It is recognised that knowledge and skill retention declines within weeks after initial
resuscitation training. Refresher training is invariably required to maintain knowledge
and skills; however, the optimal frequency for refresher training is unclear. This
section examines the evidence addressing the optimal frequency for refresher training
to maintain adequate knowledge and skills.
Specific intervals for basic life support
EIT-010
For basic life support providers (lay and HCP), are there any specific intervals for
update/retraining, compared with standard practice (i.e., 12 or 24 monthly), that
increase outcomes (e.g., skill acquisition and retention)?
Consensus on science
Six studies (LOE 144, 87; LOE 2
150
; LOE 447, 153, 154) using different training approaches demonstrated that CPR skills
(e.g., alerting EMS, chest compressions, ventilations) decay rapidly (within 3–6 months)
after initial training. Two studies (LOE 1
155
; LOE 4
156
) reported skill decay within 7–12 months after initial training. Four studies (LOE
2
150
; LOE 4157, 158, 159) demonstrated that CPR performance was retained or improved with
reevaluation, refresher, and/or retraining after as little as three months. Three
LOE 2 studies66, 150, 160 demonstrated that AED skills are retained longer than CPR
skills. One LOE 2 study
160
reported higher levels of retention from a program that achieved initial training
to a high (mastery) level. However, deterioration of CPR skills was still reported
at three months.
Treatment recommendation
For basic life support providers (lay and HCP), skills assessment and, if required,
a skills refresher should be undertaken more often than the current commonly recommended
training interval of 12–24 months.
Specific intervals for basic life supportEIT-010
EIT-010
For basic life support providers (lay and HCP), are there any specific intervals for
update/retraining, compared with standard practice (i.e., 12 or 24 monthly), that
increase outcomes (e.g., skill acquisition and retention)?
Consensus on science
Six studies (LOE 144, 87; LOE 2
150
; LOE 447, 153, 154) using different training approaches demonstrated that CPR skills
(e.g., alerting EMS, chest compressions, ventilations) decay rapidly (within 3–6 months)
after initial training. Two studies (LOE 1
155
; LOE 4
156
) reported skill decay within 7–12 months after initial training. Four studies (LOE
2
150
; LOE 4157, 158, 159) demonstrated that CPR performance was retained or improved with
reevaluation, refresher, and/or retraining after as little as three months. Three
LOE 2 studies66, 150, 160 demonstrated that AED skills are retained longer than CPR
skills. One LOE 2 study
160
reported higher levels of retention from a program that achieved initial training
to a high (mastery) level. However, deterioration of CPR skills was still reported
at three months.
Treatment recommendation
For basic life support providers (lay and HCP), skills assessment and, if required,
a skills refresher should be undertaken more often than the current commonly recommended
training interval of 12–24 months.
Specific intervals for advanced life support
EIT-011A
,
EIT-011B
For adult and paediatric advanced life support providers, do any specific intervals
for update/retraining, compared with standard practice (i.e., 12 or 24 months), increase
outcomes (e.g., skill acquisition and retention)?
Consensus on science
One LOE 1 trial
161
and one LOE 3 study
162
suggested that refresher training may enhance resuscitation knowledge retention but
did not maintain motor skills. Two RCTs (LOE 1)163, 164 showed no benefit of refresher
training.
Nine studies (LOE 3
165
; LOE 4153, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172) reported decreased resuscitation knowledge
and/or skills performance when tested 3–6 months after initial training. Two LOE 4
studies173, 174 reported decreased performance when tested 7–12 months following training.
One LOE 4 study
175
reported decay of practical skill performance when participants were tested 18 months
after training.
Treatment recommendation
For advanced life support providers there should be more frequent assessment of skill
performance and/or refresher training than is currently recommended in established
advanced life support programs. There is insufficient evidence to recommend an optimal
interval and form of assessment and/or refresher training.
Specific intervals for advanced life supportEIT-011A, EIT-011B
EIT-011A
EIT-011B
For adult and paediatric advanced life support providers, do any specific intervals
for update/retraining, compared with standard practice (i.e., 12 or 24 months), increase
outcomes (e.g., skill acquisition and retention)?
Consensus on science
One LOE 1 trial
161
and one LOE 3 study
162
suggested that refresher training may enhance resuscitation knowledge retention but
did not maintain motor skills. Two RCTs (LOE 1)163, 164 showed no benefit of refresher
training.
Nine studies (LOE 3
165
; LOE 4153, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172) reported decreased resuscitation knowledge
and/or skills performance when tested 3–6 months after initial training. Two LOE 4
studies173, 174 reported decreased performance when tested 7–12 months following training.
One LOE 4 study
175
reported decay of practical skill performance when participants were tested 18 months
after training.
Treatment recommendation
For advanced life support providers there should be more frequent assessment of skill
performance and/or refresher training than is currently recommended in established
advanced life support programs. There is insufficient evidence to recommend an optimal
interval and form of assessment and/or refresher training.
Assessment
Written examination
EIT-004
For students of adult and paediatric advanced level courses, does success in the written
examination, compared with lack of success, predict success in completing the practical
skills testing associated with the course or in cardiac arrest management performance
in actual or simulated cardiac arrest events?
Consensus on science
Four observational studies (LOE P4)176, 177, 178, 179 did not support the ability
of a written test to predict clinical skill performance in an advanced life support
course. Twelve LOE P5 studies180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190,
191 supported using written tests as a predictor of nonresuscitation clinical skills,
with variable levels of correlation ranging from 0.19 to 0.65. Three LOE P5 studies192,
193, 194 were either neutral or did not support the ability of a written test to predict
clinical skill performance.
Treatment recommendation
A written test in an advanced life support course should not be used as a substitute
for demonstration of clinical skill performance.
Written examinationEIT-004
EIT-004
For students of adult and paediatric advanced level courses, does success in the written
examination, compared with lack of success, predict success in completing the practical
skills testing associated with the course or in cardiac arrest management performance
in actual or simulated cardiac arrest events?
Consensus on science
Four observational studies (LOE P4)176, 177, 178, 179 did not support the ability
of a written test to predict clinical skill performance in an advanced life support
course. Twelve LOE P5 studies180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190,
191 supported using written tests as a predictor of nonresuscitation clinical skills,
with variable levels of correlation ranging from 0.19 to 0.65. Three LOE P5 studies192,
193, 194 were either neutral or did not support the ability of a written test to predict
clinical skill performance.
Treatment recommendation
A written test in an advanced life support course should not be used as a substitute
for demonstration of clinical skill performance.
Testing versus continuous assessment
EIT-021A
For participants undergoing basic or advanced life support courses, does end-of-course
testing, as opposed to continuous assessment and feedback, improve outcomes (e.g.,
improve learning/performance)?
Testing versus continuous assessmentEIT-021A
EIT-021A
For participants undergoing basic or advanced life support courses, does end-of-course
testing, as opposed to continuous assessment and feedback, improve outcomes (e.g.,
improve learning/performance)?
Assessment versus no assessment
EIT-030A
For lay and HCP, does the use of assessment, as opposed to no such assessment, improve
CPR knowledge, skills, and learning/retention?
Consensus on science
No studies have compared outcomes of continuous versus end-of-course assessments for
resuscitation training.
One LOE 1 manikin study
195
showed that including assessment during advanced life support training, compared with
a control group without assessment, moderately improved performance at the 2-week
postcourse scenario assessment. In another LOE 1 study
195
performance assessment after 6 months in the “testing” group compared with the control
group failed to show a statistically significant improvement.
Treatment recommendation
Summative assessment at the end of advanced life support training should be considered
as a strategy to improve learning outcomes. There is insufficient evidence to recommend
an optimal method of assessment during life support training.
Assessment versus no assessmentEIT-030A
EIT-030A
For lay and HCP, does the use of assessment, as opposed to no such assessment, improve
CPR knowledge, skills, and learning/retention?
Consensus on science
No studies have compared outcomes of continuous versus end-of-course assessments for
resuscitation training.
One LOE 1 manikin study
195
showed that including assessment during advanced life support training, compared with
a control group without assessment, moderately improved performance at the 2-week
postcourse scenario assessment. In another LOE 1 study
195
performance assessment after 6 months in the “testing” group compared with the control
group failed to show a statistically significant improvement.
Treatment recommendation
Summative assessment at the end of advanced life support training should be considered
as a strategy to improve learning outcomes. There is insufficient evidence to recommend
an optimal method of assessment during life support training.
Education knowledge gaps
•
Effect of targeting training to family and friends of those at “high risk” of cardiac
arrest.
•
Potential for tailoring preparation and training to individual learning styles.
•
Optimal assessment tools and strategy to promote learning resuscitation skills.
•
Optimal format and duration of self-instruction.
•
Impact of resuscitation training on performance in actual cardiac arrest.
•
Motivating bystanders to use AEDs.
•
Optimal training (alternative, minimal, no training, standardised instructor-led training)
for use of AEDs in actual events.
•
Governmental, social, and political measures needed to improve public participation
in life support programs.
•
Optimal ways to teach and assess leadership and team skills.
•
Specific techniques to optimise complete chest recoil during CPR without impacting
depth, rate, and duty cycle of compression, including the use of prompt and feedback
devices to acheive this.
•
Optimal method for implementing feedback devices into practice.
•
Specific advantages of prompt devices versus feedback devices and feedback timing
(real time or immediately post-event).
•
Optimal method for learning and retention of knowledge/skills.
•
Standardization in simulation nomenclature and research methods.
•
Influence of equipment or manikin fidelity, environmental fidelity, and psychological
fidelity on learning outcomes.
•
Optimal length of an instructor-led course.
•
Comparison of different course formats (e.g., a 2-day course versus four half-day
modules).
•
Effect of ongoing clinical experience on retention of skills and need for assessment
and/or refresher training.
•
Optimal interval and form for assessment.
•
Optimal format for refresher training when the need is identified.
•
Effect of type of measurement/assessment.
•
Effect of complexity on retention.
•
Optimal intervals and strategies for refresher courses for various populations.
•
Levels of knowledge/skill deterioration tolerable (clinically significant) before
a refresher course is needed.
•
Correlation between rescuer knowledge/skill competencies and patient survival.
•
Modalities to increase knowledge/skill retention (clinical exposure, simulation, video
learning).
•
Economy and logistics of shorter intervals for update/retraining.
•
Optimal form and timing of assessment to optimise learning, retention, and application
of resuscitation skills.
Risks and effects on the rescuer of CPR training and actual CPR performance
The safety of rescuers is essential during training and actual CPR performance.
CPR and AED training and experience
EIT-014A
,
BLS-002A
For providers (lay or HCP), does undertaking training/performing actual CPR or use
of a defibrillator (manual or AED), compared with no such training/performance, increase
harm to the rescuer?
CPR and AED training and experienceEIT-014A, BLS-002A
EIT-014A
BLS-002A
For providers (lay or HCP), does undertaking training/performing actual CPR or use
of a defibrillator (manual or AED), compared with no such training/performance, increase
harm to the rescuer?
Compression-only CPR
BLS-005A
,BLS-005B
For rescuers performing CPR on adults or children, does compression-only CPR, compared
with traditional CPR, result in an increase in adverse outcomes (e.g., fatigue)?
Compression-Only CPRBLS-005A
,BLS-005B
BLS-005A
For rescuers performing CPR on adults or children, does compression-only CPR, compared
with traditional CPR, result in an increase in adverse outcomes (e.g., fatigue)?
Use of barrier devices
BLS-002A
For rescuers performing CPR on adults or children (out-of-hospital and in-hospital),
does the use of a barrier device, as opposed to no such use, improve outcomes (e.g.,
lower infection risk)?
Use of barrier devicesBLS-002A
BLS-002A
For rescuers performing CPR on adults or children (out-of-hospital and in-hospital),
does the use of a barrier device, as opposed to no such use, improve outcomes (e.g.,
lower infection risk)?
Physical effects
Consensus on science
CPR is very rarely associated with adverse events to the rescuer during training or
actual performance. An observational study (LOE 4)
196
reported one muscle strain during a large public access defibrillation trial.
197
One prospective observational study (LOE 4)
198
described five musculoskeletal injuries (four back-related) associated with performing
chest compressions in 1265 medical emergency team (MET) call participants. Two retrospective
surveys of nurses and ambulance officers (LOE 4)199, 200 reported a high incidence
of back symptoms attributed to performing CPR.
Three small simulation studies (LOE 4)201, 202, 203 using a greater number of ventilations
per minute than those provided with the currently recommended compression-ventilation
ratio (30:2) described hyperventilation-related symptoms during rescue breathing.
Five single or small case series (LOE 5)204, 205, 206, 207, 208 described isolated
adverse events from training or performing actual CPR (myocardial infarction, pneumothorax,
chest pain, shortness of breath, nerve injury, allergy, vertigo). In one case report
(LOE 5)
209
a rescuer suffered a puncture wound to her left hand from a victim's sternotomy wires
when performing chest compressions.
One simulation study (LOE 5)
210
of six physicians (aged 25–40 years) and another study (LOE 5)
211
of 10 healthy medical students showed that performing chest compressions increased
rescuer oxygen consumption. The authors considered that this increase in oxygen consumption
was sufficient to cause myocardial ischaemia in individuals with coronary heart disease.
A small randomised trial of cardiac rehabilitation patients (LOE 5)
9
, however, reported no adverse physical events during CPR training.
Treatment recommendation
CPR training and actual performance is safe in most circumstances. Learners and rescuers
should consider personal and environmental risks before starting CPR. Individuals
undertaking CPR training should be advised of the nature and extent of the physical
activity required during the training program. Learners who develop significant symptoms
(e.g., chest pain, severe shortness of breath) during CPR should be advised to stop.
Rescuers who develop significant symptoms during actual CPR should consider stopping
CPR.
Rescuer fatigue
A single LOE 4 in-hospital patient study
212
of 3 min of continuous chest compressions with real-time feedback to the rescuer showed
that the mean depth of compression deteriorated between 90 and 180 s, but compression
rate was maintained. Three LOE 5 studies showed that some rescuers were unable to
complete 5 min (laypeople),
213
5–6 min (lay females),
214
or 18 min (HCPs)
215
of continuous chest compressions because of physical exhaustion. Two manikin studies
(LOE 5)215, 216 demonstrated that performing chest compressions increases heart rate
and oxygen consumption in HCPs. Two randomised manikin studies (LOE 5)213, 214 demonstrated
that >5 to 10 min of continuous chest compressions by laypeople resulted in significantly
less compression depth compared with standard 30:2 CPR, and no difference in compression
rate. In one LOE 5 manikin study
217
experienced paramedics demonstrated no decline in chest compression quality below
guideline recommendations during 10 min of BLS with any of three different compression–ventilation
ratios (15:2, 30:2, and 50:2).
Four manikin studies (LOE 5)218, 219, 220, 221 showed a time-related deterioration
in chest compression quality (mainly depth) during continuous compressions by HCPs.
A single manikin study (LOE 5)
222
demonstrated that medical students performed better-quality chest compressions during
the first 2 min of continuous chest compressions compared with 15:2 CPR, although
there was deterioration in quality after 2 min. An LOE 5 manikin study
223
of HCPs showed that the number of effective compressions (depth >38 mm) was the same
if the rescuer changed every minute or every 2 min during 8 min of continuous chest
compressions. Fatigue was reported more frequently after a 2-min period of compressions.
Treatment recommendation
When performing chest compressions, if feasible, it is reasonable to consider changing
rescuers after about 2 min to prevent rescuer fatigue (demonstrated by deterioration
in chest compression quality—in particular, depth of compressions). The change of
rescuers performing chest compressions should be done with minimum interruption to
the compressions.
Risks during defibrillation attempts
Consensus on science
Harm to the rescuer or a bystander is extremely rare during defibrillation attempts.
A large randomised trial of public access defibrillation (LOE 1)
197
and four prospective studies of first-responder AED use (LOE 4224, 225, 226; LOE 5
227
) demonstrated that AEDs can be used safely by laypeople and first responders. One
LOE 4 manikin study
228
observed that laypeople using an AED touched the manikin during shock delivery in
one third of defibrillation attempts.
An observational study (LOE 4)
229
of 43 patients undergoing cardioversion measured only a small current leakage through
“mock rescuers” wearing polyethylene gloves and simulating chest compression during
shock delivery. One LOE 5 systematic review
230
identified eight articles that reported a total of 29 adverse events associated with
defibrillation. Only one case (LOE 5)
231
has been published since 1997. A 150-J biphasic shock was delivered during chest compressions.
The rescuer doing chest compressions felt the electric discharge and did not suffer
any harm. Seven cases were due to accidental or intentional defibrillator misuse (LOE
5)232, 233, 234, 235, 236, one was due to device malfunction (LOE 5)
237
, and four occurred during training/maintenance procedures (LOE 5)237, 238. A case
series (LOE 5)
237
identified 14 adverse events during actual resuscitation; all caused only minor harm.
The risks to individuals in contact with a patient during implanted cardioverter defibrillator
(ICD) discharge are difficult to quantify. Four single case reports (LOE 5)239, 240,
241, 242 described shocks to the rescuer from discharging ICDs. ICD discharge was
associated with a significant jolt to rescuers and in one case resulted in a peripheral
nerve injury.
242
Three animal studies suggested that the use of defibrillators in wet environments
is safe (LOE 5)243, 244, 245.
There are no reports of harm to rescuers from attempting defibrillation in wet environments.
Treatment recommendation
The risks associated with defibrillation are less than previously thought. There is
insufficient evidence to recommend that continuing manual chest compressions during
shock delivery for defibrillation is safe. It is reasonable for rescuers to wear gloves
when performing CPR and attempting defibrillation (manual and/or AED) but resuscitation
should not be delayed/withheld if gloves are not available.
There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation about the safety of contacting
a patient during ICD discharge. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation
about the best method of avoiding shocks to the rescuer from an ICD discharge during
CPR.
Although there are no reports of harm to rescuers, there is insufficient evidence
to make a recommendation about the safety of defibrillation in wet environments.
Psychological effects
Consensus on science
One large prospective trial of PAD (LOE 4)
196
reported a few adverse psychological effects requiring intervention that were associated
with CPR or AED use. One prospective analysis of stress reactions associated with
a trial of public access defibrillation (LOE 4)
246
reported low levels of stress in those responding to an emergency in this setting.
One prospective observational study of 1265 MET calls (LOE 4)
198
described “psychological injury” related to CPR performance in one rescuer. Two large
retrospective questionnaire-based reports relating to performance of CPR by a bystander
(LOE 4)247, 248 reported that nearly all respondents regarded their intervention as
a positive experience. Two small retrospective studies of nurses involved in delivery
of CPR (LOE 4
249
; LOE 5
250
) noted the stress involved and the importance of recognition and management of this
stress.
Treatment recommendation
There are few reports of psychological harm to rescuers after involvement in a resuscitative
attempt. There is insufficient evidence to support or refute any recommendation about
minimizing the incidence of psychological harm to rescuers.
Disease transmission
Consensus on science
There are only a very few cases reported (LOE 5) where performing CPR has been implicated
in disease transmission. Salmonella infantis,
251
panton-valentine leucocidin staphylococcus aureus,
252
severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS),
253
meningococcal meningitis,
254
helicobacter pylori,
255
herpes simplex virus,256, 257 cutaneous tuberculosis,
258
stomatitis,
259
tracheitis,
260
shigella,
261
and streptococcus pyogenes
262
have been implicated. One report described herpes simplex virus infection as a result
of training in CPR (LOE 5)
263
. One systematic review found that in the absence of high-risk activities, such as
intravenous cannulation, there were no reports of transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis
C, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or cytomegalovirus during either training or
actual CPR (LOE 5)
264
.
Treatment recommendation
The risk of disease transmission during training and actual CPR performance is very
low. Rescuers should take appropriate safety precautions, especially if a victim is
known to have a serious infection (e.g., HIV, tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus, or
SARS).
Barrier devices
Consensus on science
No human studies have addressed the safety, effectiveness, or feasibility of using
barrier devices to prevent patient contact during rescue breathing. Nine clinical
reports (LOE 5)257, 258, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268 proposed or advocated the use of
barrier devices to protect the rescuer from transmitted disease. Three LOE 5 studies269,
270, 271 showed that barrier devices can decrease transmission of bacteria in controlled
laboratory settings.
Treatment recommendation
The risk of disease transmission is very low and initiating rescue breathing without
a barrier device is reasonable. If available, rescuers may consider using a barrier
device. Safety precautions should be taken if the victim is known to have a serious
infection (e.g., HIV, tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus, or SARS).
Knowledge gaps
•
Actual incidence of disease transmission and other harm during CPR
•
Safety of hands-on defibrillation
•
Safest type of glove
•
CPR in patients with ICDs
•
Role of barrier devices
Rescuer willingness to respond
Increasing the willingness of individuals to respond to a cardiac arrest with early
recognition, calling for help, and initiation of CPR is essential to improve survival
rates.
Factors that increase outcomes
EIT-008A
,
EIT-008B
Among bystanders (lay or HCP), are there any specific factors, compared with standard
interventions, that increase outcomes (e.g., willingness to provide CPR or the actual
performance of CPR [standard or chest compression only]) in adults or children with
cardiac arrest (prehospital)?
Consensus on science
Sixteen LOE 4 studies5, 246, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282,
283, 284, 285 have suggested that many factors decrease the willingness of bystanders
to start CPR, including bystander characteristics (panic, fear of disease or harming
the victim or performing CPR incorrectly) and victim characteristics (stranger, being
unkempt, evidence of drug use, blood, or vomit).
Two studies (LOE 1
131
; LOE 4
286
) have suggested that training rescuers to recognise gasping as a sign of cardiac
arrest improves identification of cardiac arrest victims. Ten studies (LOE 2
10
; LOE 45, 272, 274, 280, 281, 282, 287, 288, 289) showed increased bystander CPR rate
in those trained in CPR, especially if training had occurred within five years. Three
LOE 5 studies272, 275, 290 showed that willingness to perform CPR was increased when
emergency dispatchers provided telephone CPR instructions. Eight LOE 4 studies273,
277, 280, 284, 285, 287, 291, 292 provided evidence that potential rescuers would
be more likely to start CPR if they had the option to use compression-only CPR.
Treatment recommendation
To increase willingness to perform CPR
•
Laypeople should receive training in CPR. This training should include the recognition
of gasping or abnormal breathing as a sign of cardiac arrest when other signs of life
are absent.
•
Laypeople should be trained to start resuscitation with chest compressions in adult
and paediatric victims.
•
If unwilling or unable to perform ventilations, rescuers should be instructed to continue
compression-only CPR.
•
EMS dispatchers should provide CPR instructions to callers who report cardiac arrest.
•
When providing CPR instructions, EMS dispatchers should include recognition of gasping
and abnormal breathing.
Knowledge gaps
•
Optimal method for teaching recognition of cardiac arrest including gasping, agonal,
and abnormal breathing.
•
Optimal method for laypeople to recognise return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
•
Optimal methods for mass education of laypeople.
Factors that increase outcomesEIT-008A, EIT-008B
EIT-008A
EIT-008B
Among bystanders (lay or HCP), are there any specific factors, compared with standard
interventions, that increase outcomes (e.g., willingness to provide CPR or the actual
performance of CPR [standard or chest compression only]) in adults or children with
cardiac arrest (prehospital)?
Consensus on science
Sixteen LOE 4 studies5, 246, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282,
283, 284, 285 have suggested that many factors decrease the willingness of bystanders
to start CPR, including bystander characteristics (panic, fear of disease or harming
the victim or performing CPR incorrectly) and victim characteristics (stranger, being
unkempt, evidence of drug use, blood, or vomit).
Two studies (LOE 1
131
; LOE 4
286
) have suggested that training rescuers to recognise gasping as a sign of cardiac
arrest improves identification of cardiac arrest victims. Ten studies (LOE 2
10
; LOE 45, 272, 274, 280, 281, 282, 287, 288, 289) showed increased bystander CPR rate
in those trained in CPR, especially if training had occurred within five years. Three
LOE 5 studies272, 275, 290 showed that willingness to perform CPR was increased when
emergency dispatchers provided telephone CPR instructions. Eight LOE 4 studies273,
277, 280, 284, 285, 287, 291, 292 provided evidence that potential rescuers would
be more likely to start CPR if they had the option to use compression-only CPR.
Treatment recommendation
To increase willingness to perform CPR
•
Laypeople should receive training in CPR. This training should include the recognition
of gasping or abnormal breathing as a sign of cardiac arrest when other signs of life
are absent.
•
Laypeople should be trained to start resuscitation with chest compressions in adult
and paediatric victims.
•
If unwilling or unable to perform ventilations, rescuers should be instructed to continue
compression-only CPR.
•
EMS dispatchers should provide CPR instructions to callers who report cardiac arrest.
•
When providing CPR instructions, EMS dispatchers should include recognition of gasping
and abnormal breathing.
Knowledge gaps
•
Optimal method for teaching recognition of cardiac arrest including gasping, agonal,
and abnormal breathing
•
Optimal method for laypeople to recognise return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
•
Optimal methods for mass education of laypeople
Implementation and teams
The best scientific evidence for resuscitation will have little impact on patient
outcomes if it is not effectively translated into clinical practice. Successful implementation
is dependent on effective educational strategies to ensure that resuscitation providers
have the necessary knowledge and skills in combination with the provision of necessary
infrastructure and resources.
293
Education itself is only one strategy for implementing changes. This section addresses
the need for a framework for successful implementation of guidelines, including broad
implementation strategies that include educational activities.
Implementation strategies
Little is known about what strategies work best for implementing evidence-based guidelines
in communities, institutions, or units. Implementation of the 2005 resuscitation guidelines
in emergency medical services agencies was reported to take a mean of 416 ± 172 days
in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites
294
and 18 months in the Netherlands.
295
Identified barriers to rapid implementation included delays in getting staff trained,
equipment delays, and organisational decision making.294, 295 This section provides
insight into several elements that appear to facilitate successful implementation.
Implementation factors
EIT-022
,
EIT-022B
In communities where processes/guidelines are being implemented, does the use of any
specific factors, compared with no such use, improve outcomes (e.g., success of implementation)?
Consensus on science
Using the implementation of therapeutic hypothermia as an example, two LOE 3296, 297
and one LOE 5
298
single-institution interventional studies supported the use of a written protocol,
pathway, or standard operating procedure as part of a comprehensive approach to implementing
the therapeutic hypothermia guideline. One LOE 2 survey
299
and one LOE 3 single-institution intervention
300
also supported the use of written protocols, although Hay
300
only briefly described cointerventions used.
A wide spectrum of evidence supports the use of a comprehensive, multifaceted approach
to guideline implementation, including identification and use of clinical champions,
a consensus-building process, multidisciplinary involvement, written protocols, detailed
process descriptions, practical logistic support, multimodality/multilevel education,
and rapid cycle improvement (e.g., Plan, Do, Study, Act) to respond to problems as
they arise. The evidence supporting this multifaceted approach includes one LOE 3
study,
296
one LOE 5 intervention description,
298
two LOE 5 theoretical reviews,301, 302 and four LOE 5 studies extrapolated from nonhypothermia
nonarrest settings (2 RCTs,303, 304 one concurrent controlled trial,
305
and one retrospective controlled trial
306
).
Treatment recommendation
Institutions or communities planning to implement complex guidelines such as therapeutic
hypothermia should consider using a comprehensive, multifaceted approach including
clinical champions, a consensus-building process, multidisciplinary involvement, written
protocols, detailed process description, practical logistic support, multimodality/multilevel
education, and rapid cycle improvement methods.
Investigators studying implementation of guidelines should consider using a framework
for implementing guidelines (e.g., Brach-AHRQ, 2008)
302
and report whether results were measured or estimated, and whether they were sustained.
Knowledge gaps
•
Which specific factors (such as consensus-building, logistic support, rapid cycle
improvement) are most critical for successful guidelines implementation?
•
Differences between in-hospital and EMS implementations.
•
Effectiveness of a multilevel approach (country, community, organisation, unit, individual).
•
Importance of describing all cointerventions during implementation studies.
•
Repeat surveys over time with same population to assess progress in implementation
and to identify success factors and barriers.
Implementation factorsEIT-022, EIT-022B
EIT-022
EIT-022B
In communities where processes/guidelines are being implemented, does the use of any
specific factors, compared with no such use, improve outcomes (e.g., success of implementation)?
Consensus on science
Using the implementation of therapeutic hypothermia as an example, two LOE 3296, 297
and one LOE 5
298
single-institution interventional studies supported the use of a written protocol,
pathway, or standard operating procedure as part of a comprehensive approach to implementing
the therapeutic hypothermia guideline. One LOE 2 survey
299
and one LOE 3 single-institution intervention
300
also supported the use of written protocols, although Hay
300
only briefly described cointerventions used.
A wide spectrum of evidence supports the use of a comprehensive, multifaceted approach
to guideline implementation, including identification and use of clinical champions,
a consensus-building process, multidisciplinary involvement, written protocols, detailed
process descriptions, practical logistic support, multimodality/multilevel education,
and rapid cycle improvement (e.g., Plan, Do, Study, Act) to respond to problems as
they arise. The evidence supporting this multifaceted approach includes one LOE 3
study,
296
one LOE 5 intervention description,
298
two LOE 5 theoretical reviews,301, 302 and four LOE 5 studies extrapolated from nonhypothermia
nonarrest settings (2 RCTs,303, 304 one concurrent controlled trial,
305
and one retrospective controlled trial
306
).
Treatment recommendation
Institutions or communities planning to implement complex guidelines such as therapeutic
hypothermia should consider using a comprehensive, multifaceted approach including
clinical champions, a consensus-building process, multidisciplinary involvement, written
protocols, detailed process description, practical logistic support, multimodality/multilevel
education, and rapid cycle improvement methods.
Investigators studying implementation of guidelines should consider using a framework
for implementing guidelines (e.g., Brach-AHRQ, 2008)
302
and report whether results were measured or estimated, and whether they were sustained.
Knowledge gaps
•
Which specific factors (such as consensus-building, logistic support, rapid cycle
improvement) are most critical for successful guidelines implementation?
•
Differences between in-hospital and EMS implementations.
•
Effectiveness of a multilevel approach (country, community, organisation, unit, individual).
•
Importance of describing all cointerventions during implementation studies.
•
Repeat surveys over time with same population to assess progress in implementation
and to identify success factors and barriers.
Individual and team factors
Individual and team factors impact performance during resuscitative attempts. This
section describes specific factors that have an impact on performance during simulated
or actual cardiac arrest.
Prehospital physicians
ALS-SC-077
In adult cardiac arrest (prehospital), does the performance of advanced life support
procedures by experienced physicians, as opposed to standard care (without physicians),
improve outcomes (e.g., ROSC, survival)?
Consensus on science
In adult cardiac arrest, physician presence during resuscitation, compared with paramedics
alone, has been reported to increase compliance with guidelines (LOE 2
307
; LOE 4
308
) and physicians in some systems can perform advanced resuscitation procedures more
successfully (LOE 2307, 309; LOE 4310, 311, 312).
When compared within individual systems, four studies suggested improved survival
to hospital discharge when physicians were part of the resuscitation team (LOE 2313,
314; LOE 3315, 316) and 10 studies suggested no difference in survival of the event
(LOE 2)307, 313 or survival to hospital discharge (LOE 2)307, 315, 317, 318, 319,
320, 321, 322, 323. One study found lower survival of the event when physicians were
part of the resuscitation team (LOE 2)
323
.
Studies indirectly comparing resuscitation outcomes between physician-staffed and
other systems are difficult to interpret because of the heterogeneity among systems,
independent of physician-staffing (LOE 5)
324
. High survival rates after cardiac arrest have been reported from systems that employ
experienced physicians as part of the EMS response (LOE 3325, 326; LOE 4310, 312,
327) and these survival rates may be higher than in systems that rely on nonphysician
providers (LOE 2
328
; LOE 3325, 326, 329). Other comparisons noted no difference in survival between systems
using paramedics or physicians as part of the response (LOE 3)330, 331. Well-organised
nonphysician systems with highly trained paramedics also reported high survival rates
(LOE 5)
324
. There are no RCTs to address this question.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for or against physician versus
nonphysician providers of ALS during out-of-hospital CPR.
Knowledge gaps
More data are required to determine the training required to achieve best outcomes,
the level of training and experience required to maintain competence in procedural
skills, and the cost-effectiveness of physicians compared with nonphysicians.
Prehospital physiciansALS-SC-077
ALS-SC-077
In adult cardiac arrest (prehospital), does the performance of advanced life support
procedures by experienced physicians, as opposed to standard care (without physicians),
improve outcomes (e.g., ROSC, survival)?
Consensus on science
In adult cardiac arrest, physician presence during resuscitation, compared with paramedics
alone, has been reported to increase compliance with guidelines (LOE 2
307
; LOE 4
308
) and physicians in some systems can perform advanced resuscitation procedures more
successfully (LOE 2307, 309; LOE 4310, 311, 312).
When compared within individual systems, four studies suggested improved survival
to hospital discharge when physicians were part of the resuscitation team (LOE 2313,
314; LOE 3315, 316) and 10 studies suggested no difference in survival of the event
(LOE 2)307, 313 or survival to hospital discharge (LOE 2)307, 315, 317, 318, 319,
320, 321, 322, 323. One study found lower survival of the event when physicians were
part of the resuscitation team (LOE 2)
323
.
Studies indirectly comparing resuscitation outcomes between physician-staffed and
other systems are difficult to interpret because of the heterogeneity among systems,
independent of physician-staffing (LOE 5)
324
. High survival rates after cardiac arrest have been reported from systems that employ
experienced physicians as part of the EMS response (LOE 3325, 326; LOE 4310, 312,
327) and these survival rates may be higher than in systems that rely on nonphysician
providers (LOE 2
328
; LOE 3325, 326, 329). Other comparisons noted no difference in survival between systems
using paramedics or physicians as part of the response (LOE 3)330, 331. Well-organised
nonphysician systems with highly trained paramedics also reported high survival rates
(LOE 5)
324
. There are no RCTs to address this question.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for or against physician versus
nonphysician providers of ALS during out-of-hospital CPR.
Knowledge gaps
More data are required to determine the training required to achieve best outcomes,
the level of training and experience required to maintain competence in procedural
skills, and the cost-effectiveness of physicians compared with nonphysicians.
Advanced life support checklists
EIT-031A
,
EIT-031B
Does the use of a checklist during adult and paediatric advanced life support as opposed
to no checklist, improve outcomes (e.g., compliance with guidelines, other outcomes)?
Consensus on science
Four LOE 5 randomised trials of cognitive aids/checklists for simulated basic life
support,92, 95, 332, 333 three LOE 5 randomised trials of cognitive aids in simulated
anaesthetic emergency or advanced resuscitation,334, 335, 336 and one LOE 5 observational
study
337
showed improvement in proxy outcomes (e.g., proper dosing of medications or performance
of correct CPR procedures). One randomised
338
and one nonrandomised
339
trial (LOE 5) of cognitive aids showed improved recall of factual information important
for effective advanced life support. Two LOE 4 surveys340, 341 on the use of checklists
in actual resuscitations reported that physicians perceived cognitive aids to be useful.
One LOE 5 retrospective analysis of actual anaesthesia emergency
342
suggested that a cognitive aid algorithm might be helpful in diagnosis and management.
One LOE 5, three-armed study of simulated basic life support
333
demonstrated no difference in CPR performance between the short-checklist arm and
the no-checklist arm, but a positive outcome in the long-checklist arm. One LOE 5
study of neonatal resuscitation
343
did not demonstrate any benefit from using a poster prompt.
Potential harm was found in one LOE 5 randomised trial of simulated basic life support
103
in which participants with a mobile-phone cognitive aid had >1-min delay in starting
CPR. An LOE 5 simulated PALS study
344
showed potential harm because a significant portion of hand-held cognitive aid users
applied the wrong algorithm. The outcome of using a cognitive aid such as a checklist
may be specific to the aid or the situation.
Treatment recommendation
It is reasonable to use cognitive aids (e.g., checklists) during resuscitation, provided
that they do not delay the start of resuscitative efforts. Aids should be validated
using simulation or patient trials, both before and after implementation, to guide
rapid cycle improvement.
Knowledge gaps
•
The value of cognitive aids in simulated and actual resuscitation.
•
Potential for unintended consequences associated with the use of a cognitive aid (especially
delay to initiation of intervention or use of incorrect algorithm).
•
Utility of specific cognitive aids with specific providers or in specific situations.
•
Human factors issues in solo and team resuscitation.
•
Optimal model for follow-up quality assurance (assessment of efficacy and rapid cycle
improvement) after introduction of a cognitive aid.
•
Transferability or generalizability of cognitive aids across settings.
•
Can cognitive aids such as simple checklists be used without training?
Advanced life support checklistsEIT-031A, EIT-031B
EIT-031A
EIT-031B
Does the use of a checklist during adult and paediatric advanced life support as opposed
to no checklist, improve outcomes (e.g., compliance with guidelines, other outcomes)?
Consensus on science
Four LOE 5 randomised trials of cognitive aids/checklists for simulated basic life
support,92, 95, 332, 333 three LOE 5 randomised trials of cognitive aids in simulated
anaesthetic emergency or advanced resuscitation,334, 335, 336 and one LOE 5 observational
study
337
showed improvement in proxy outcomes (e.g., proper dosing of medications or performance
of correct CPR procedures). One randomised
338
and one nonrandomised
339
trial (LOE 5) of cognitive aids showed improved recall of factual information important
for effective advanced life support. Two LOE 4 surveys340, 341 on the use of checklists
in actual resuscitations reported that physicians perceived cognitive aids to be useful.
One LOE 5 retrospective analysis of actual anaesthesia emergency
342
suggested that a cognitive aid algorithm might be helpful in diagnosis and management.
One LOE 5, three-armed study of simulated basic life support
333
demonstrated no difference in CPR performance between the short-checklist arm and
the no-checklist arm, but a positive outcome in the long-checklist arm. One LOE 5
study of neonatal resuscitation
343
did not demonstrate any benefit from using a poster prompt.
Potential harm was found in one LOE 5 randomised trial of simulated basic life support
103
in which participants with a mobile-phone cognitive aid had >1-min delay in starting
CPR. An LOE 5 simulated PALS study
344
showed potential harm because a significant portion of hand-held cognitive aid users
applied the wrong algorithm. The outcome of using a cognitive aid such as a checklist
may be specific to the aid or the situation.
Treatment recommendation
It is reasonable to use cognitive aids (e.g., checklists) during resuscitation, provided
that they do not delay the start of resuscitative efforts. Aids should be validated
using simulation or patient trials, both before and after implementation, to guide
rapid cycle improvement.
Knowledge gaps
•
The value of cognitive aids in simulated and actual resuscitation.
•
Potential for unintended consequences associated with the use of a cognitive aid (especially
delay to initiation of intervention or use of incorrect algorithm).
•
Utility of specific cognitive aids with specific providers or in specific situations.
•
Human factors issues in solo and team resuscitation.
•
Optimal model for follow-up quality assurance (assessment of efficacy and rapid cycle
improvement) after introduction of a cognitive aid.
•
Transferability or generalizability of cognitive aids across settings.
•
Can cognitive aids such as simple checklists be used without training?
Team briefings/debriefings
EIT-001A
,
EIT-001B
For resuscitation teams, do briefings/debriefings, when compared to no briefings/debriefings,
improve performance or outcomes?
Team briefings/debriefingsEIT-001A, EIT-001B
EIT-001A
EIT-001B
For resuscitation teams, do briefings/debriefings, when compared to no briefings/debriefings,
improve performance or outcomes?
HCP briefings/debriefings
NRP-033A
,
NRP-033B
For HCPs, do briefings (before a learning or patient-care experience) and/or debriefings
(after a learning or patient care experience), when compared to no briefings or debriefings,
improve the acquisition of content knowledge, technical skills and behavioral skills
required for effective and safe resuscitation?
Consensus on science
The terms ‘briefing,’ ‘debriefing,’ and ‘feedback’ are often used interchangeably
in studies and have therefore been grouped as ‘briefings/debriefings’ in the Consensus
on Science. Debriefings tend to occur after the event. Debriefing is an integral part
of the actual training intervention in many studies. This makes it difficult to measure
the effect of the debriefing.
Evidence from one LOE 1 prospective RCT
345
and 16 other studies (LOE 3–4)71, 73, 93, 125, 126, 132, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350,
351, 352, 353, 354, 355 documented improvement with briefings/debriefings in the acquisition
of the content knowledge, technical skills, and/or behavioral skills required for
effective and safe resuscitation. One LOE 4 study
356
revealed no effect of briefings/debriefings on performance. No studies indicated that
the use of briefings/debriefings had any negative effect.
Treatment recommendation
It is reasonable to recommend the use of briefings and debriefings during both learning
and actual clinical activities.
Knowledge gaps
•
Relative benefits of team versus individual briefings/debriefings.
•
Differential effectiveness of video, verbal, and other measures of feedback.
•
Effects of briefings/debriefings on technical versus nontechnical skills.
HCP briefings/debriefingsNRP-033A, NRP-033B
NRP-033A
NRP-033B
For HCPs, do briefings (before a learning or patient-care experience) and/or debriefings
(after a learning or patient care experience), when compared to no briefings or debriefings,
improve the acquisition of content knowledge, technical skills and behavioral skills
required for effective and safe resuscitation?
Consensus on science
The terms ‘briefing,’ ‘debriefing,’ and ‘feedback’ are often used interchangeably
in studies and have therefore been grouped as ‘briefings/debriefings’ in the Consensus
on Science. Debriefings tend to occur after the event. Debriefing is an integral part
of the actual training intervention in many studies. This makes it difficult to measure
the effect of the debriefing.
Evidence from one LOE 1 prospective RCT
345
and 16 other studies (LOE 3–4)71, 73, 93, 125, 126, 132, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350,
351, 352, 353, 354, 355 documented improvement with briefings/debriefings in the acquisition
of the content knowledge, technical skills, and/or behavioral skills required for
effective and safe resuscitation. One LOE 4 study
356
revealed no effect of briefings/debriefings on performance. No studies indicated that
the use of briefings/debriefings had any negative effect.
Treatment recommendation
It is reasonable to recommend the use of briefings and debriefings during both learning
and actual clinical activities.
Knowledge gaps
•
Relative benefits of team versus individual briefings/debriefings.
•
Differential effectiveness of video, verbal, and other measures of feedback.
•
Effects of briefings/debriefings on technical versus nontechnical skills.
System factors
This section describes broader resuscitation programs and implementation strategies
that have an impact at a system level.
AED program factors
EIT-015
In AED programs, what specific factors when included (e.g., linkage to 911 registries,
location of program [including home]), compared with not included predict an effective
outcome for the program?
AED program factorsEIT-015
EIT-015
In AED programs, what specific factors when included (e.g., linkage to 911 registries,
location of program [including home]), compared with not included predict an effective
outcome for the program?
Outcomes of AED programs
BLS-004B
In adults and children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (including residential
settings), does implementation of a public access AED program, as opposed to traditional
EMS response, improve successful outcomes (e.g., ROSC)?
Consensus on science
One RCT (LOE 1)
197
, four prospective controlled cohort studies (LOE 2)357, 358, 359, 360, one study
using historical controls (LOE 3)
361
, nine observational studies (LOE 4)226, 227, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, and
one mathematical modeling study (LOE 5)
369
showed that AED programs are safe and feasible and significantly increase survival
of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest if the emergency response
plan is effectively implemented and sustained.
For EMS programs, 10 studies (LOE 1
370
; LOE 2
358
; LOE 3224, 371, 372; LOE 4373, 374, 375, 376, 377) supported AED use; 11 studies
(LOE 2378, 379; LOE 3380, 381, 382, 383; LOE 4384, 385, 386, 387, 388) were neutral,
and two meta-analyses359, 389 suggested benefit.
For first-responder use, two studies (LOE 2
390
; LOE 3
391
) supported use of AEDs by fire or police first responders, but six studies (LOE 1
392
; LOE 2
393
; LOE 3394, 395, 396; LOE 4
397
) were neutral.
In public access trials, six studies (LOE 1
197
; LOE 2
357
; LOE 3361, 362; LOE 4365, 367) supported PAD. Two studies (LOE 3
398
; LOE 5
399
) were neutral. Five LOE 4 studies226, 363, 364, 400, 401 demonstrated survival attributed
to AED programs in casinos, airplanes, or airports. One LOE 4 study
402
was neutral.
For home AED deployment, three studies (LOE 1197, 403; LOE 2
404
) showed that home AED programs are safe and feasible but were unlikely to result
in a significant increase in survival of out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest.
For on-site AEDs in public places, 11 studies (LOE 1
197
; LOE 2
357
; LOE 3224, 361, 362; LOE 4226, 363, 364, 365, 366, 405) supported on-site AEDs. This
approach demonstrates high survival at low deployment rates. Four studies (LOE 1
392
; LOE 2
406
; LOE 3395, 398) did not demonstrate improvement in survival to discharge compared
with EMS, despite better response time.
For mobile AEDs, three studies (LOE 2357, 358; LOE 3
391
) reported that community first responders (CFRs) equipped with AEDs achieved improvement
in survival when they arrived at the patient's side sooner than traditional EMS responders.
In one LOE 2 study
358
first responders were trained only in AED use; however, most survivors received CPR
and AED, suggesting a role for CPR. There is no evidence to support a specific type
of rescuer as better than another. One LOE 3 study
361
noted that even untrained bystanders achieved good results.
One LOE 3 study
398
reported that use of a restrictive dispatch protocol (unresponsive and not breathing)
to summon first responders reduced the frequency of deployment, by reducing not only
false alarms (false-positives) but also legitimate calls (true positives). In contrast,
in one LOE 2 study
358
a less-restrictive dispatch protocol (unresponsive patient) yielded more false-positives
as part of a wider involvement of first responders and increased survival. No difference
in response interval appeared to be related to instrument of dispatch (telephone compared
with pager).
Treatment recommendation
Implementation of AED programs in public settings should be based on the characteristics
of published reports of successful programs in similar settings.
Home AED use for high-risk individuals who do not have an ICD is safe and feasible
and may be considered on an individual basis, but has not been shown to change overall
survival rates.
Because population-specific (e.g., rate of witnessed arrest) and program-specific
(e.g., response time) characteristics affect survival, when implementing an AED program,
community and program leaders should consider factors such as location, development
of a team with responsibility for monitoring and maintaining the devices, training
and retraining programs for those who are likely to use the AED, coordination with
the local EMS agency, and identification of a group of paid or volunteer individuals
who are committed to using the AED for victims of arrest.
Knowledge gaps
•
Community or program characteristics of effective AED programs
Other specific worksheets that would be helpful are:
•
Evaluating AED deployment strategies
•
Should communities perform cardiac arrest surveillance to inform placement of public
AEDs?
Outcomes of AED programsBLS-004B
BLS-004B
In adults and children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (including residential
settings), does implementation of a public access AED program, as opposed to traditional
EMS response, improve successful outcomes (e.g., ROSC)?
Consensus on science
One RCT (LOE 1)
197
, four prospective controlled cohort studies (LOE 2)357, 358, 359, 360, one study
using historical controls (LOE 3)
361
, nine observational studies (LOE 4)226, 227, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, and
one mathematical modeling study (LOE 5)
369
showed that AED programs are safe and feasible and significantly increase survival
of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest if the emergency response
plan is effectively implemented and sustained.
For EMS programs, 10 studies (LOE 1
370
; LOE 2
358
; LOE 3224, 371, 372; LOE 4373, 374, 375, 376, 377) supported AED use; 11 studies
(LOE 2378, 379; LOE 3380, 381, 382, 383; LOE 4384, 385, 386, 387, 388) were neutral,
and two meta-analyses359, 389 suggested benefit.
For first-responder use, two studies (LOE 2
390
; LOE 3
391
) supported use of AEDs by fire or police first responders, but six studies (LOE 1
392
; LOE 2
393
; LOE 3394, 395, 396; LOE 4
397
) were neutral.
In public access trials, six studies (LOE 1
197
; LOE 2
357
; LOE 3361, 362; LOE 4365, 367) supported PAD. Two studies (LOE 3
398
; LOE 5
399
) were neutral. Five LOE 4 studies226, 363, 364, 400, 401 demonstrated survival attributed
to AED programs in casinos, airplanes, or airports. One LOE 4 study
402
was neutral.
For home AED deployment, three studies (LOE 1197, 403; LOE 2
404
) showed that home AED programs are safe and feasible but were unlikely to result
in a significant increase in survival of out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest.
For on-site AEDs in public places, 11 studies (LOE 1
197
; LOE 2
357
; LOE 3224, 361, 362; LOE 4226, 363, 364, 365, 366, 405) supported on-site AEDs. This
approach demonstrates high survival at low deployment rates. Four studies (LOE 1
392
; LOE 2
406
; LOE 3395, 398) did not demonstrate improvement in survival to discharge compared
with EMS, despite better response time.
For mobile AEDs, three studies (LOE 2357, 358; LOE 3
391
) reported that community first responders (CFRs) equipped with AEDs achieved improvement
in survival when they arrived at the patient's side sooner than traditional EMS responders.
In one LOE 2 study
358
first responders were trained only in AED use; however, most survivors received CPR
and AED, suggesting a role for CPR. There is no evidence to support a specific type
of rescuer as better than another. One LOE 3 study
361
noted that even untrained bystanders achieved good results.
One LOE 3 study
398
reported that use of a restrictive dispatch protocol (unresponsive and not breathing)
to summon first responders reduced the frequency of deployment, by reducing not only
false alarms (false-positives) but also legitimate calls (true positives). In contrast,
in one LOE 2 study
358
a less-restrictive dispatch protocol (unresponsive patient) yielded more false-positives
as part of a wider involvement of first responders and increased survival. No difference
in response interval appeared to be related to instrument of dispatch (telephone compared
with pager).
Treatment recommendation
Implementation of AED programs in public settings should be based on the characteristics
of published reports of successful programs in similar settings.
Home AED use for high-risk individuals who do not have an ICD is safe and feasible
and may be considered on an individual basis, but has not been shown to change overall
survival rates.
Because population-specific (e.g., rate of witnessed arrest) and program-specific
(e.g., response time) characteristics affect survival, when implementing an AED program,
community and program leaders should consider factors such as location, development
of a team with responsibility for monitoring and maintaining the devices, training
and retraining programs for those who are likely to use the AED, coordination with
the local EMS agency, and identification of a group of paid or volunteer individuals
who are committed to using the AED for victims of arrest.
Knowledge gaps
•
Community or program characteristics of effective AED programs
Other specific worksheets that would be helpful
•
Evaluating AED deployment strategies
•
Should communities perform cardiac arrest surveillance to inform placement of public
AEDs?
Cardiac arrest centres
EIT-027
In adults and children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, does transport to a specialist
cardiac arrest centre (i.e., one providing a comprehensive package of post resuscitation
care), compared with no such directed transport, improve outcomes (e.g., survival)?
Consensus on science
Seven observational studies showed wide variability in survival to hospital discharge,407,
408, 409, 410, 411 one-month survival,
412
or length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay
413
among hospitals caring for patients after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. One North
American observational study
411
showed that higher-volume centres (>50 ICU admissions following cardiac arrest per
year) had a better survival to hospital discharge than low-volume centres (<20 cases
admitted to ICU following cardiac arrest) for patients treated for either in- or out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest. Another observational study
414
showed that unadjusted survival to discharge was greater in hospitals that received
≥40 cardiac arrest patients/year compared with those that received <40 per year, but
this difference disappeared after adjustment for patient factors.
Three LOE 3 observational studies297, 415, 416 with historic control groups showed
improved survival after implementation of a comprehensive package of post resuscitation
care that included therapeutic hypothermia and percutaneous coronary intervention
(PCI). Two small LOE 3 observational studies417, 418 demonstrated a trend toward improvement
that was not statistically significant when comparing historic controls with the introduction
of a comprehensive package of post resuscitation care, which included therapeutic
hypothermia, PCI, and goal-directed therapy. One LOE 4 observational study
409
suggested improved survival to discharge after out of hospital cardiac arrest in large
hospitals with cardiac catheter facilities compared with smaller hospitals with no
cardiac catheter facilities. Another LOE 4 observational study
414
also showed improved outcome in hospitals with cardiac catheter facilities that was
not statistically significant after adjustment for other variables. Three LOE 3 studies
of out-of-hospital adult cardiac arrest419, 420, 421 with short transport intervals
(3–11 min) failed to demonstrate any effect of transport interval from the scene to
the receiving hospital on survival to hospital discharge if ROSC was achieved at the
scene.
Although there is no direct evidence that regional cardiac resuscitation systems of
care (SOCs) improve outcomes compared with no SOC, extrapolation from multiple studies
(LOE 5 for this question) evaluating SOC for other acute time-sensitive conditions
suggested a potential benefit. High-quality randomised trials and prospective observational
studies of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) SOCs demonstrated improved422,
423, 424, 425 or neutral426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431 outcomes compared with no SOC.
Many case-control studies of regionalised care for trauma patients demonstrated improved432,
433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449,
450 or neutral outcomes451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457 when comparing an SOC with
no SOC. One study that evaluated a trauma SOC
458
showed a higher mortality in the trauma centre. Observational studies and randomised
trials459, 460 showed that organised care improves outcomes after acute stroke.
Treatment recommendation
While extrapolation from randomised and observational studies of SOCs for other acute
time-sensitive conditions (trauma, STEMI, stroke) suggests that specialist cardiac
arrest centres and systems of care may be effective, there is insufficient direct
evidence to recommend for or against their use.
Knowledge gaps
•
Safe journey time or distance for patient transport under various conditions
•
Essential treatments that a cardiac resuscitation centre should offer
•
Role of secondary transport from receiving hospital to a regional centre
•
Ethics of conducting an RCT of standard care versus transport to a cardiac resuscitation
centre
•
Conditions under which a cardiac resuscitation centre is worthwhile (e.g., in areas
where the other links in the Chain of Survival are optimised)
•
Cost-effectiveness of cardiac arrest centres
Cardiac arrest centresEIT-027
EIT-027
In adults and children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, does transport to a specialist
cardiac arrest centre (i.e., one providing a comprehensive package of post resuscitation
care), compared with no such directed transport, improve outcomes (e.g., survival)?
Consensus on science
Seven observational studies showed wide variability in survival to hospital discharge,407,
408, 409, 410, 411 one-month survival,
412
or length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay
413
among hospitals caring for patients after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. One North
American observational study
411
showed that higher-volume centres (>50 ICU admissions following cardiac arrest per
year) had a better survival to hospital discharge than low-volume centres (<20 cases
admitted to ICU following cardiac arrest) for patients treated for either in- or out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest. Another observational study
414
showed that unadjusted survival to discharge was greater in hospitals that received
≥40 cardiac arrest patients/year compared with those that received <40 per year, but
this difference disappeared after adjustment for patient factors.
Three LOE 3 observational studies297, 415, 416 with historic control groups showed
improved survival after implementation of a comprehensive package of post resuscitation
care that included therapeutic hypothermia and percutaneous coronary intervention
(PCI). Two small LOE 3 observational studies417, 418 demonstrated a trend toward improvement
that was not statistically significant when comparing historic controls with the introduction
of a comprehensive package of post resuscitation care, which included therapeutic
hypothermia, PCI, and goal-directed therapy. One LOE 4 observational study
409
suggested improved survival to discharge after out of hospital cardiac arrest in large
hospitals with cardiac catheter facilities compared with smaller hospitals with no
cardiac catheter facilities. Another LOE 4 observational study
414
also showed improved outcome in hospitals with cardiac catheter facilities that was
not statistically significant after adjustment for other variables. Three LOE 3 studies
of out-of-hospital adult cardiac arrest419, 420, 421 with short transport intervals
(3–11 min) failed to demonstrate any effect of transport interval from the scene to
the receiving hospital on survival to hospital discharge if ROSC was achieved at the
scene.
Although there is no direct evidence that regional cardiac resuscitation systems of
care (SOCs) improve outcomes compared with no SOC, extrapolation from multiple studies
(LOE 5 for this question) evaluating SOC for other acute time-sensitive conditions
suggested a potential benefit. High-quality randomised trials and prospective observational
studies of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) SOCs demonstrated improved422,
423, 424, 425 or neutral426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431 outcomes compared with no SOC.
Many case-control studies of regionalised care for trauma patients demonstrated improved432,
433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449,
450 or neutral outcomes451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457 when comparing an SOC with
no SOC. One study that evaluated a trauma SOC
458
showed a higher mortality in the trauma centre. Observational studies and randomised
trials459, 460 showed that organised care improves outcomes after acute stroke.
Treatment recommendation
While extrapolation from randomised and observational studies of SOCs for other acute
time-sensitive conditions (trauma, STEMI, stroke) suggests that specialist cardiac
arrest centres and systems of care may be effective, there is insufficient direct
evidence to recommend for or against their use.
Knowledge gaps
•
Safe journey time or distance for patient transport under various conditions
•
Essential treatments that a cardiac resuscitation centre should offer
•
Role of secondary transport from receiving hospital to a regional centre
•
Ethics of conducting an RCT of standard care versus transport to a cardiac resuscitation
centre
•
Conditions under which a cardiac resuscitation centre is worthwhile (e.g., in areas
where the other links in the Chain of Survival are optimised)
•
Cost-effectiveness of cardiac arrest centres
What resuscitation training interventions are practical, feasible, and effective in
low-income countries?
EIT-028A
,
EIT-028B
Consensus on science
Trauma resuscitation
Trauma resuscitation studies constitute extrapolated evidence (LOE 5) for cardiac
arrest patients. One study in Tanzania,
461
two studies in Trinidad and Tobago
462
and Ecuador,
463
and one study in Nigeria
464
reported that implementation of standard ATLS or trauma team training and modified
trauma training programs were effective in developing trauma skill competencies in
hospital providers. A study from Trinidad and Tobago
465
and two studies comparing Cambodia and Northern Iraq466, 467 demonstrated that the
delivery of standard or appropriately modified ATLS training to the local community
improved hospital mortality from trauma. Another study in Trinidad and Tobago
468
showed no difference in 6-h mortality after standard ATLS training when compared with
pretraining.
One study in Trinidad and Tobago
469
showed that implementation of standard prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS) programs
were effective in imparting competency in trauma skills to prehospital providers.
Another study in Trinidad and Tobago
470
and 1 study in Mexico
471
demonstrated improved trauma patient survival to hospital admission when prehospital
providers were trained in PHTLS and basic trauma life support (BTLS).
Neonatal resuscitation
One LOE 3 study in India
472
and one LOE 3 study in Zambia
473
demonstrated that neonatal resuscitation training improved neonatal mortality when
incorporated into neonatal care training of midwives and traditional birth attendants,
respectively. One LOE 2 study
474
in Argentina, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Pakistan, and Zambia and
one LOE 3 study
475
in 14 centres in India did not demonstrate similar mortality reductions when training
hospital physicians and nurses in neonatal resuscitation. In one LOE 3 study
476
in Kenya, healthcare workers significantly improved operational performance immediately
after a 1-day modified Resuscitation Council (UK) neonatal resuscitation course. One
LOE 3 study
474
in Zambia demonstrated that midwives trained in neonatal resuscitation (American Academy
of Pediatrics and American Heart Association Neonatal Resuscitation Program) maintained
their psychomotor skills at 6 months, while cognitive skills declined to baseline.
Paediatric advanced, adult cardiac, basic life, first aid
Currently there is little evidence to address the hypothesis that basic, adult cardiac,
or paediatric advance life support training programs provide the necessary training
for the learners to achieve the significant improvement in cognitive, psychomotor,
or team skills required to impact self-efficacy, competence, operational performance,
or patient outcomes in developing countries. One LOE 2 study in Brazil
477
demonstrated a significant improvement in ROSC if a member of the resuscitation team
was trained in ACLS, but survival to hospital discharge was not significantly different.
One LOE 2 study
471
showed that implementation of standard ACLS in addition to BTLS training of prehospital
providers in Mexico was not more effective in improving prehospital mortality from
trauma compared with PHTLS alone.
One LOE 1 study in Brazil
478
demonstrated that video training was effective in training laypeople in basic skills
of first aid, but was not effective in training the more complex skills of CPR.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against paediatric or adult basic
or advanced level life support training programs in low-income countries. However,
there is evidence that emergency medical training programs in neonatal and trauma
resuscitation should be considered in these countries.
When delivering programs in low-income countries, consideration should be given to
local adaptation of training, utilizing existing and sustainable resources for both
care and training, and the development of a dedicated local infrastructure.
Knowledge gaps
•
Which strategies of conducting sustainable emergency medical training programs in
low-income countries are cost-effective?
•
Which validated educational assessment tools can be tailored to low-income countries?
•
What is the relative effectiveness of various training methods in low-income countries?
•
Which educational interventions improve clinical outcomes in low-income countries?
What resuscitation training interventions are practical, feasible, and effective in
low-income countries?EIT-028A, EIT-028B
EIT-028A
EIT-028B
Consensus on science
Trauma resuscitation
Trauma resuscitation studies constitute extrapolated evidence (LOE 5) for cardiac
arrest patients. One study in Tanzania,
461
two studies in Trinidad and Tobago
462
and Ecuador,
463
and one study in Nigeria
464
reported that implementation of standard ATLS or trauma team training and modified
trauma training programs were effective in developing trauma skill competencies in
hospital providers. A study from Trinidad and Tobago
465
and two studies comparing Cambodia and Northern Iraq466, 467 demonstrated that the
delivery of standard or appropriately modified ATLS training to the local community
improved hospital mortality from trauma. Another study in Trinidad and Tobago
468
showed no difference in 6-h mortality after standard ATLS training when compared with
pretraining.
One study in Trinidad and Tobago
469
showed that implementation of standard prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS) programs
were effective in imparting competency in trauma skills to prehospital providers.
Another study in Trinidad and Tobago
470
and 1 study in Mexico
471
demonstrated improved trauma patient survival to hospital admission when prehospital
providers were trained in PHTLS and basic trauma life support (BTLS).
Neonatal resuscitation
One LOE 3 study in India
472
and one LOE 3 study in Zambia
473
demonstrated that neonatal resuscitation training improved neonatal mortality when
incorporated into neonatal care training of midwives and traditional birth attendants,
respectively. One LOE 2 study
474
in Argentina, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Pakistan, and Zambia and
one LOE 3 study
475
in 14 centres in India did not demonstrate similar mortality reductions when training
hospital physicians and nurses in neonatal resuscitation. In one LOE 3 study
476
in Kenya, healthcare workers significantly improved operational performance immediately
after a 1-day modified Resuscitation Council (UK) neonatal resuscitation course. One
LOE 3 study
474
in Zambia demonstrated that midwives trained in neonatal resuscitation (American Academy
of Pediatrics and American Heart Association Neonatal Resuscitation Program) maintained
their psychomotor skills at 6 months, while cognitive skills declined to baseline.
Paediatric advanced, adult cardiac, basic life, first aid
Currently there is little evidence to address the hypothesis that basic, adult cardiac,
or paediatric advance life support training programs provide the necessary training
for the learners to achieve the significant improvement in cognitive, psychomotor,
or team skills required to impact self-efficacy, competence, operational performance,
or patient outcomes in developing countries. One LOE 2 study in Brazil
477
demonstrated a significant improvement in ROSC if a member of the resuscitation team
was trained in ACLS, but survival to hospital discharge was not significantly different.
One LOE 2 study
471
showed that implementation of standard ACLS in addition to BTLS training of prehospital
providers in Mexico was not more effective in improving prehospital mortality from
trauma compared with PHTLS alone.
One LOE 1 study in Brazil
478
demonstrated that video training was effective in training laypeople in basic skills
of first aid, but was not effective in training the more complex skills of CPR.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against paediatric or adult basic
or advanced level life support training programs in low-income countries. However,
there is evidence that emergency medical training programs in neonatal and trauma
resuscitation should be considered in these countries.
When delivering programs in low-income countries, consideration should be given to
local adaptation of training, utilizing existing and sustainable resources for both
care and training, and the development of a dedicated local infrastructure.
Knowledge gaps
•
Which strategies of conducting sustainable emergency medical training programs in
low-income countries are cost-effective?
•
Which validated educational assessment tools can be tailored to low-income countries?
•
What is the relative effectiveness of various training methods in low-income countries?
•
Which educational interventions improve clinical outcomes in low-income countries?
Performance measurement systems
EIT-023B
For resuscitation systems (out-of-hospital and in-hospital), does the use of a performance
measurement system (e.g., Utstein template of outcome assessment) improve and/or allow
for comparison of system outcomes (patient-level and system-level variables)?
Consensus on science
One LOE 3 before-and-after intervention study
479
found no statistically significant improvement in CPR quality or patient survival
from providing information about CPR performance to the training teams of three different
ambulance services. One LOE 4 case series
480
found a positive psychological effect on EMS personnel of reporting cardiac arrest
outcomes back to them and presenting the results to the media.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations supporting or refuting the
effectiveness of specific performance measurement interventions to improve processes
of care and/or clinical outcomes in resuscitation systems.
Knowledge gaps
•
The optimal system to monitor and improve the quality of care delivered within a resuscitation
system.
•
Does providing feedback to emergency medical personnel about their performance (individually
and/or at a system level) improve patient outcomes?
Performance measurement systemsEIT-023B
EIT-023B
For resuscitation systems (out-of-hospital and in-hospital), does the use of a performance
measurement system (e.g., Utstein template of outcome assessment) improve and/or allow
for comparison of system outcomes (patient-level and system-level variables)?
Consensus on science
One LOE 3 before-and-after intervention study
479
found no statistically significant improvement in CPR quality or patient survival
from providing information about CPR performance to the training teams of three different
ambulance services. One LOE 4 case series
480
found a positive psychological effect on EMS personnel of reporting cardiac arrest
outcomes back to them and presenting the results to the media.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations supporting or refuting the
effectiveness of specific performance measurement interventions to improve processes
of care and/or clinical outcomes in resuscitation systems.
Knowledge gaps
•
The optimal system to monitor and improve the quality of care delivered within a resuscitation
system.
•
Does providing feedback to emergency medical personnel about their performance (individually
and/or at a system level) improve patient outcomes?
Recognition and prevention
Patients who have cardiac arrest often have unrecognised or untreated warning signs.
This section describes strategies to predict, recognise, and prevent cardiorespiratory
arrest, including the role of education.
Sudden death in apparently healthy children and young adults
EIT-007
In apparently healthy children and young adults, does the presence of any warning
signs available to the layperson or HCP (e.g., syncope, family history), as opposed
to their absence, predict an increased risk of sudden death? (Exclude screening in
athletes and patients with known ischaemic heart disease.)
Consensus on science
Specific symptoms in apparently healthy children and young adults
There are no studies specifically examining the nature of syncope in apparently healthy
children and young adults and their risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). In one LOE
P3 study
481
a family history of syncope or SCD, palpitations as a symptom, supine syncope, and
syncope associated with exercise and emotional stress were more common in patients
with than without Long QT Syndrome (LQTS). Two LOE P5 studies in older adults482,
483 identified the absence of nausea and vomiting before syncope and electrocardiogram
(ECG) abnormalities as independent predictors of arrhythmic syncope. Less than 5 s
of warning signs before syncope and less than two syncope episodes were predictors
of syncope due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or atrioventricular (AV) block.
A postmortem case study (LOE 5)
484
highlighted that inexplicable drowning and drowning in a strong swimmer may be due
to LQTS or Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT). Two LOE P5
studies485, 486 identified an association between LQTS and presentation with seizure
phenotype.
Screening for risk of SCD in apparently healthy young adults and children
Evidence from two large prospective screening trials (LOE P1)487, 488 failed to identify
any symptoms alone as a predictor of SCD in apparently healthy children and young
adults. There was strong evidence in one of these trials
487
for use of 12-lead ECG when screening for cardiac disease.
Prodromal symptoms in victims of sudden death and SCD
Eight LOE P5 studies489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497 examined the prodromal
symptoms in victims of sudden death and SCD. Many patients complained of cardiac symptoms
including syncope/presyncope, chest pain, and palpitations before death.
Risk of SCD in patients with known cardiac disease
In patients with a known diagnosis of cardiac disease, 11 studies (LOE P4
498
; LOE P5499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508) showed that syncope (with
or without prodrome—particularly recent or recurrent) was invariably identified as
an independent risk factor for increased risk of death. Chest pain on exertion only,
and palpitations associated with syncope only, were associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,
coronary abnormalities, Wolff-Parkinson-White, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular
cardiomyopathy.
Screening of family members
Five LOE P4 studies498, 509, 510, 511, 512 examining the systematic evaluation of
family members of patients with cardiac diseases associated with SCD and victims of
SCD demonstrated a high yield of families affected by syndromes associated with SCD.
Treatment recommendation
Children and young adults presenting with characteristic symptoms of arrhythmic syncope
should have a specialist cardiology assessment, which should include an ECG and in
most cases an echocardiogram and exercise test.
Characteristics of arrhythmic syncope include syncope in the supine position, occurring
during or after exercise, with no or only brief prodromal symptoms, repetitive episodes,
or in individuals with a family history of sudden death. In addition, nonpleuritic
chest pain, palpitations associated with syncope, seizures (when resistant to treatment,
occurring at night, or precipitated by exercise, syncope, or loud noise), and drowning
in a competent swimmer should raise suspicion of increased risk. Systematic evaluation
in a clinic specializing in the care of those at risk for SCD is recommended in family
members of young victims of SCD or those with a known cardiac disorder resulting in
an increased risk of SCD.
Knowledge gaps
•
Efficacy, elements, and patient selection criteria for dedicated cardiac screening
clinics for relatives of patients with inheritable cardiac disease or SCD victims.
•
Outcomes in children and young people specifically investigated for cardiac symptoms
potentially related to risk of SCD.
•
Incidence of warning signs in those who have suffered sudden unexpected death in the
young compared with those who died from other causes or a control population.
•
Cardiac evaluation of children with seizure disorders without definite cerebral disease
and recalcitrant to therapy.
Sudden death in apparently healthy children and young adultsEIT-007
EIT-007
In apparently healthy children and young adults, does the presence of any warning
signs available to the layperson or HCP (e.g., syncope, family history), as opposed
to their absence, predict an increased risk of sudden death? (Exclude screening in
athletes and patients with known ischaemic heart disease.)
Consensus on science
Specific symptoms in apparently healthy children and young adults
There are no studies specifically examining the nature of syncope in apparently healthy
children and young adults and their risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). In one LOE
P3 study
481
a family history of syncope or SCD, palpitations as a symptom, supine syncope, and
syncope associated with exercise and emotional stress were more common in patients
with than without Long QT Syndrome (LQTS). Two LOE P5 studies in older adults482,
483 identified the absence of nausea and vomiting before syncope and electrocardiogram
(ECG) abnormalities as independent predictors of arrhythmic syncope. Less than 5 s
of warning signs before syncope and less than two syncope episodes were predictors
of syncope due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or atrioventricular (AV) block.
A postmortem case study (LOE 5)
484
highlighted that inexplicable drowning and drowning in a strong swimmer may be due
to LQTS or Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT). Two LOE P5
studies485, 486 identified an association between LQTS and presentation with seizure
phenotype.
Screening for risk of SCD in apparently healthy young adults and children
Evidence from two large prospective screening trials (LOE P1)487, 488 failed to identify
any symptoms alone as a predictor of SCD in apparently healthy children and young
adults. There was strong evidence in one of these trials
487
for use of 12-lead ECG when screening for cardiac disease.
Prodromal symptoms in victims of sudden death and SCD
Eight LOE P5 studies489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497 examined the prodromal
symptoms in victims of sudden death and SCD. Many patients complained of cardiac symptoms
including syncope/presyncope, chest pain, and palpitations before death.
Risk of SCD in patients with known cardiac disease
In patients with a known diagnosis of cardiac disease, 11 studies (LOE P4
498
; LOE P5499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508) showed that syncope (with
or without prodrome—particularly recent or recurrent) was invariably identified as
an independent risk factor for increased risk of death. Chest pain on exertion only,
and palpitations associated with syncope only, were associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,
coronary abnormalities, Wolff-Parkinson-White, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular
cardiomyopathy.
Screening of family members
Five LOE P4 studies498, 509, 510, 511, 512 examining the systematic evaluation of
family members of patients with cardiac diseases associated with SCD and victims of
SCD demonstrated a high yield of families affected by syndromes associated with SCD.
Treatment recommendation
Children and young adults presenting with characteristic symptoms of arrhythmic syncope
should have a specialist cardiology assessment, which should include an ECG and in
most cases an echocardiogram and exercise test.
Characteristics of arrhythmic syncope include syncope in the supine position, occurring
during or after exercise, with no or only brief prodromal symptoms, repetitive episodes,
or in individuals with a family history of sudden death. In addition, nonpleuritic
chest pain, palpitations associated with syncope, seizures (when resistant to treatment,
occurring at night, or precipitated by exercise, syncope, or loud noise), and drowning
in a competent swimmer should raise suspicion of increased risk. Systematic evaluation
in a clinic specializing in the care of those at risk for SCD is recommended in family
members of young victims of SCD or those with a known cardiac disorder resulting in
an increased risk of SCD.
Knowledge gaps
•
Efficacy, elements, and patient selection criteria for dedicated cardiac screening
clinics for relatives of patients with inheritable cardiac disease or SCD victims.
•
Outcomes in children and young people specifically investigated for cardiac symptoms
potentially related to risk of SCD.
•
Incidence of warning signs in those who have suffered sudden unexpected death in the
young compared with those who died from other causes or a control population.
•
Cardiac evaluation of children with seizure disorders without definite cerebral disease
and recalcitrant to therapy.
Early recognition and response systems to prevent in-hospital cardiac arrests
EIT-024
In adults admitted to hospital, does use of early warning systems/rapid response team
(RRT) systems/MET systems, compared with no such responses, reduce cardiac and respiratory
arrest?
Consensus on science
A single LOE 1 study involving 23 hospitals
513
did not show a reduction in cardiac arrest rate after introduction of an MET when
analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Post hoc analysis of that study
514
showed a significant inverse relationship between frequency of team activation and
cardiac arrest and unexpected mortality rate. An LOE 2 multicentre study
515
did not show a reduction in cardiac arrest numbers after implementation of an MET.
Seven additional LOE 3 studies516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522 did not show a reduction
in cardiac arrest rate associated with the introduction of an RRT/MET.
A meta-analysis
523
showed that RRT/MET systems were associated with a reduction in rate of cardiopulmonary
arrest outside the ICU but not with a lower hospital mortality rate.
Seventeen LOE 3 single-centre studies524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532,
533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540 reported reduced numbers of cardiac arrests
after the implementation of RRT/MET systems. None of these studies addressed the impact
of confounding factors on study outcomes.
A single-centre LOE 3 study
541
was unable to demonstrate a reduction in cardiac arrest rates after the implementation
of an early warning scoring system (EWSS). After implementing an EWSS, cardiac arrest
rate increased among patients who had higher early warning scores, compared to similarly
scored patients before the intervention.
Treatment recommendation
In adult patients admitted to hospital, there is insufficient evidence to support
or refute the use of early warning/RRT/MET systems, compared with no such systems,
to reduce cardiac and respiratory arrests and hospital mortality. However, it is reasonable
for hospitals to provide a system of care that includes (a) staff education about
the signs of patient deterioration; (b) appropriate and regular vital signs monitoring
of patients; (c) clear guidance (e.g., via calling criteria or early warning scores)
to assist staff in the early detection of patient deterioration; (d) a clear, uniform
system of calling for assistance; and (e) a clinical response to calls for assistance.
There is insufficient evidence to identify the best methods for the delivery of these
components and, based on current evidence, this should be based on local circumstances.
Early recognition and response systems to prevent in-hospital cardiac arrestsEIT-024
EIT-024
In adults admitted to hospital, does use of early warning systems/rapid response team
(RRT) systems/MET systems, compared with no such responses, reduce cardiac and respiratory
arrest?
Consensus on science
A single LOE 1 study involving 23 hospitals
513
did not show a reduction in cardiac arrest rate after introduction of an MET when
analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Post hoc analysis of that study
514
showed a significant inverse relationship between frequency of team activation and
cardiac arrest and unexpected mortality rate. An LOE 2 multicentre study
515
did not show a reduction in cardiac arrest numbers after implementation of an MET.
Seven additional LOE 3 studies516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522 did not show a reduction
in cardiac arrest rate associated with the introduction of an RRT/MET.
A meta-analysis
523
showed that RRT/MET systems were associated with a reduction in rate of cardiopulmonary
arrest outside the ICU but not with a lower hospital mortality rate.
Seventeen LOE 3 single-centre studies524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532,
533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540 reported reduced numbers of cardiac arrests
after the implementation of RRT/MET systems. None of these studies addressed the impact
of confounding factors on study outcomes.
A single-centre LOE 3 study
541
was unable to demonstrate a reduction in cardiac arrest rates after the implementation
of an early warning scoring system (EWSS). After implementing an EWSS, cardiac arrest
rate increased among patients who had higher early warning scores, compared to similarly
scored patients before the intervention.
Treatment recommendation
In adult patients admitted to hospital, there is insufficient evidence to support
or refute the use of early warning/RRT/MET systems, compared with no such systems,
to reduce cardiac and respiratory arrests and hospital mortality. However, it is reasonable
for hospitals to provide a system of care that includes (a) staff education about
the signs of patient deterioration; (b) appropriate and regular vital signs monitoring
of patients; (c) clear guidance (e.g., via calling criteria or early warning scores)
to assist staff in the early detection of patient deterioration; (d) a clear, uniform
system of calling for assistance; and (e) a clinical response to calls for assistance.
There is insufficient evidence to identify the best methods for the delivery of these
components and, based on current evidence, this should be based on local circumstances.
Prediction of cardiac arrest in adult patients in hospital
EIT-025
In hospital inpatients (adult), does the presence of any specific factors, compared
with no such factors, predict occurrence of cardiac arrest (or other outcome)?
Consensus on science
Outcome: cardiac arrest
One LOE P3 multicentre cross-sectional survey,
542
one LOE P2 multicentre matched case–control study using pooled outcomes (cardiac arrest,
unplanned ICU admission, and death),
543
and two single-hospital retrospective case-control studies (LOE P3
544
and LOE P4
545
) supported the ability of alterations in physiological variables, singly or in combination,
to predict the occurrence of cardiac arrest. Single variables included heart rate,
respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and decrease in level of consciousness.
Combined elements included variably pooled and scored data (Modified Early Warning
Score [MEWS]) with different cut-off points (MET criteria and MEWS). Sensitivity ranged
from 49% to 89% and specificity from 77% to 99%.
An LOE P3 multicentre prospective observational study
546
measured the incidence of cardiac arrest, unplanned ICU admissions, and deaths, with
or without antecedents recorded on charts: 60% of primary events had antecedents,
the most frequent being decreases in systolic blood pressure and Glasgow Coma Scale
(GCS) score.
Opposing evidence from one LOE P2 multicentre matched case–control study
543
and one LOE P2 single-hospital retrospective case-control study
545
reported that single variables and cut-offs did not correlate with the occurrence
of cardiac arrest. Data were insufficient to define which variables and cut-offs were
the best predictors of the occurrence of cardiac arrest.
Outcome: unexpected ICU admission
One LOE P3 multicentre cross-sectional survey,
542
one LOE P2 multicentre matched case–control study using pooled outcomes (cardiac arrest,
unplanned ICU admission, and death),
543
one LOE P3 single-institution retrospective observational study,
547
and one LOE P2 single-centre prospective cohort study
548
suggested that for in-hospital patients, altered vital signs were associated with
unplanned ICU admission. However, different criteria for ICU admission between studies
make this a less useful end point.
Outcome: mortality (predicted on admission to hospital)
Six studies (LOE P2
549
; LOE P3550, 551; LOE P4552, 553, 554) supported the value of combinations of demographic,
physiological, and/or laboratory variables recorded on admission in predicting death
in specific patient populations.
Three studies (LOE P2
555
LOE P3
556
and LOE P4
557
) supported the value of combinations of demographic, physiological, and laboratory
variables recorded on admission in predicting death in specific patient populations.
Eleven studies (LOE P1558, 559, 560, 561, 562, 563; LOE P2548, 564, 565 and LOE P3566,
567) supported the value of different combinations of demographic, physiological,
and/or laboratory value derangement recorded at admission to hospital in predicting
death with a sensitivity and specificity in the range of 0.6–0.8, but the best combination
of variables and cut-off levels is still to be identified.
Prediction during hospital stay on ordinary wards
Eleven studies (LOE P1 prospective multicentre observational
568
; LOE P1 prospective single-centre cohort569, 570; LOE P3 multicentre cross-sectional
survey542, 571; LOE 2 multicentre matched case-control using pooled outcomes [cardiac
arrest, unplanned ICU admission, and death]
543
; LOE P2 single-centre prospective observational572, 573, 574; LOE P3 multicentre
prospective in a selected population of patients with greater illness severity
575
; LOE P3 single-centre retrospective observational
576
) supported the ability of physiological derangements measured in adult ward patients
to predict death. The more abnormalities, the higher the risk of death, with a positive
predictive value ranging from 11% to 70%. The best combination of variables and cut-off
points is still to be identified.
Best variables to predict outcome
One LOE P2 cohort study on existing datasets
577
and 3 LOE P1 single-centre prospective studies561, 562, 563 evaluating different variables
showed a marked variation in their sensitivity and positive predictive value. For
aggregate-weighted scoring systems, inclusion of heart rate (HR), respiratory rate
(RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), AVPU (alert, vocalizing, pain, unresponsive),
temperature, age, and oxygen saturation achieved the best predictive value (area under
Receiver Operating Characteristic curve 0.782, 95% CI 0.767–0.797). For single-parameter
track and trigger systems, cut-off points of HR <35 and >140 min−1, RR <6 and >32 min−1,
and SBP <80 mm Hg achieved the best positive predictive value. The inclusion of age
improved the predictive value of both aggregate and single-parameter scoring systems.
Treatment recommendation
Hospitals should use a system validated for their specific patient population to identify
individuals at increased risk of serious clinical deterioration, cardiac arrest, or
death, both on admission and during hospital stay.
Prediction of cardiac arrest in adult patients in hospitalEIT-025
EIT-025
In hospital inpatients (adult), does the presence of any specific factors, compared
with no such factors, predict occurrence of cardiac arrest (or other outcome)?
Consensus on science
Outcome: cardiac arrest
One LOE P3 multicentre cross-sectional survey,
542
one LOE P2 multicentre matched case–control study using pooled outcomes (cardiac arrest,
unplanned ICU admission, and death),
543
and two single-hospital retrospective case–control studies (LOE P3
544
and LOE P4
545
) supported the ability of alterations in physiological variables, singly or in combination,
to predict the occurrence of cardiac arrest. Single variables included heart rate,
respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and decrease in level of consciousness.
Combined elements included variably pooled and scored data (Modified Early Warning
Score [MEWS]) with different cut-off points (MET criteria and MEWS). Sensitivity ranged
from 49% to 89% and specificity from 77% to 99%.
An LOE P3 multicentre prospective observational study
546
measured the incidence of cardiac arrest, unplanned ICU admissions, and deaths, with
or without antecedents recorded on charts: 60% of primary events had antecedents,
the most frequent being decreases in systolic blood pressure and Glasgow Coma Scale
(GCS) score.
Opposing evidence from one LOE P2 multicentre matched case-control study
543
and one LOE P2 single-hospital retrospective case–control study
545
reported that single variables and cut-offs did not correlate with the occurrence
of cardiac arrest. Data were insufficient to define which variables and cut-offs were
the best predictors of the occurrence of cardiac arrest.
Outcome: unexpected ICU admission
One LOE P3 multicentre cross-sectional survey,
542
one LOE P2 multicentre matched case–control study using pooled outcomes (cardiac arrest,
unplanned ICU admission, and death),
543
one LOE P3 single-institution retrospective observational study,
547
and one LOE P2 single-centre prospective cohort study
548
suggested that for in-hospital patients, altered vital signs were associated with
unplanned ICU admission. However, different criteria for ICU admission between studies
make this a less useful end point.
Outcome: mortality (predicted on admission to hospital)
Six studies (LOE P2
549
; LOE P3550, 551; LOE P4552, 553, 554) supported the value of combinations of demographic,
physiological, and/or laboratory variables recorded on admission in predicting death
in specific patient populations.
Three studies (LOE P2
555
LOE P3
556
and LOE P4
557
) supported the value of combinations of demographic, physiological, and laboratory
variables recorded on admission in predicting death in specific patient populations.
Eleven studies (LOE P1558, 559, 560, 561, 562, 563; LOE P2548, 564, 565 and LOE P3566,
567) supported the value of different combinations of demographic, physiological,
and/or laboratory value derangement recorded at admission to hospital in predicting
death with a sensitivity and specificity in the range of 0.6–0.8, but the best combination
of variables and cut-off levels is still to be identified.
Prediction during hospital stay on ordinary wards
Eleven studies (LOE P1 prospective multicentre observational
568
; LOE P1 prospective single-centre cohort569, 570; LOE P3 multicentre cross-sectional
survey542, 571; LOE 2 multicentre matched case–control using pooled outcomes [cardiac
arrest, unplanned ICU admission, and death]
543
; LOE P2 single-centre prospective observational572, 573, 574; LOE P3 multicentre
prospective in a selected population of patients with greater illness severity
575
; LOE P3 single-centre retrospective observational
576
) supported the ability of physiological derangements measured in adult ward patients
to predict death. The more abnormalities, the higher the risk of death, with a positive
predictive value ranging from 11% to 70%. The best combination of variables and cut-off
points is still to be identified.
Best variables to predict outcome
One LOE P2 cohort study on existing datasets
577
and 3 LOE P1 single-centre prospective studies561, 562, 563 evaluating different variables
showed a marked variation in their sensitivity and positive predictive value. For
aggregate-weighted scoring systems, inclusion of heart rate (HR), respiratory rate
(RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), AVPU (alert, vocalizing, pain, unresponsive),
temperature, age, and oxygen saturation achieved the best predictive value (area under
Receiver Operating Characteristic curve 0.782, 95% CI 0.767–0.797). For single-parameter
track and trigger systems, cut-off points of HR <35 and >140 min−1, RR <6 and >32 min−1,
and SBP <80 mm Hg achieved the best positive predictive value. The inclusion of age
improved the predictive value of both aggregate and single-parameter scoring systems.
Treatment recommendation
Hospitals should use a system validated for their specific patient population to identify
individuals at increased risk of serious clinical deterioration, cardiac arrest, or
death, both on admission and during hospital stay.
Educational strategies to improve outcomes
EIT-026A
For hospital staff, does the use of any specific educational strategies, compared
with no such strategies, improve outcomes (e.g., early recognition and rescue of the
deteriorating patient at risk of cardiac/respiratory arrest)?
Consensus on science
There are no RCTs addressing the impact of a specific educational intervention on
improvement of outcomes such as the earlier recognition or rescue of the deteriorating
patient at risk of cardiac/respiratory arrest.
One LOE 3 multicentre before-and-after study
578
found that the number of cardiac arrest calls decreased while prearrest calls increased
after implementing a standardised educational program in two hospitals; the intervention
was associated with a decrease in true arrests as well as an increase in initial survival
after cardiac arrest and survival to discharge. A prospective LOE 3 single-centre
trial
579
of a simulation-based educational program failed to yield such benefits.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to identify specific educational strategies that improve
outcomes (e.g., early recognition and rescue of the deteriorating patient at risk
of cardiac/respiratory arrest). Educational efforts have a positive impact on knowledge,
skills, and attitudes/confidence, and increase the frequency of activation of a response,
and should therefore be considered.
Knowledge gaps
•
Optimal risk stratification on admission and during hospital stay for clinical deterioration
or death.
•
Methods to identify patients most likely to benefit from early treatment escalation.
•
Importance of various components of the rapid response system—including education,
monitoring, calling criteria, mechanism of calling, and response.
•
Elements of required education—including calling criteria, clinical skills, and simulation
training.
•
Optimal frequency of vital signs monitoring to detect deterioration.
•
Cost-benefits of physician-led versus nonphysicians teams.
•
Cost-benefits of rapid response team versus patient team responses.
•
Do RRT/MET systems (or their individual components) improve outcomes other than cardiac
arrest (e.g., reduced hospital mortality, reduced length of stay)?
•
Impact of other variables (e.g., time of day, monitoring status) on risk.
Educational strategies to improve outcomesEIT-026A
EIT-026A
For hospital staff, does the use of any specific educational strategies, compared
with no such strategies, improve outcomes (e.g., early recognition and rescue of the
deteriorating patient at risk of cardiac/respiratory arrest)?
Consensus on science
There are no RCTs addressing the impact of a specific educational intervention on
improvement of outcomes such as the earlier recognition or rescue of the deteriorating
patient at risk of cardiac/respiratory arrest.
One LOE 3 multicentre before-and-after study
578
found that the number of cardiac arrest calls decreased while prearrest calls increased
after implementing a standardised educational program in two hospitals; the intervention
was associated with a decrease in true arrests as well as an increase in initial survival
after cardiac arrest and survival to discharge. A prospective LOE 3 single-centre
trial
579
of a simulation-based educational program failed to yield such benefits.
Treatment recommendation
There is insufficient evidence to identify specific educational strategies that improve
outcomes (e.g., early recognition and rescue of the deteriorating patient at risk
of cardiac/respiratory arrest). Educational efforts have a positive impact on knowledge,
skills, and attitudes/confidence, and increase the frequency of activation of a response,
and should therefore be considered.
Knowledge gaps
•
Optimal risk stratification on admission and during hospital stay for clinical deterioration
or death.
•
Methods to identify patients most likely to benefit from early treatment escalation.
•
Importance of various components of the rapid response system—including education,
monitoring, calling criteria, mechanism of calling, and response.
•
Elements of required education—including calling criteria, clinical skills, and simulation
training.
•
Optimal frequency of vital signs monitoring to detect deterioration.
•
Cost-benefits of physician-led versus nonphysicians teams.
•
Cost-benefits of rapid response team versus patient team responses.
•
Do RRT/MET systems (or their individual components) improve outcomes other than cardiac
arrest (e.g., reduced hospital mortality, reduced length of stay)?
•
Impact of other variables (e.g., time of day, monitoring status) on risk.
Ethics and outcomes
The decision to start, continue and terminate resuscitation efforts is based on the
balance between the risks, benefits, and burdens these interventions place on patients,
family members, and healthcare providers. There are circumstances where resuscitation
is inappropriate and should not be provided. This includes when there is clear evidence
that to start resuscitation would be futile or against the expressed wishes of the
patient. Systems should be established to communicate these prospective decisions
and simple algorithms should be developed to assist rescuers in limiting the burden
of unnecessary, potentially painful treatments.
Decisions before cardiac arrest
EIT-016
In adults and children with cardiac arrest (prehospital [OHCA], in-hospital [IHCA]),
does existence and use of advance directives (e.g., “living wills” and Do Not Attempt
Resuscitation [DNAR] orders), compared with no such directives, improve outcomes (e.g.,
appropriate resuscitative efforts)?
Consensus on science
In adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, five studies (LOE 4580, 581, 582; LOE
5583, 584) supported the use of DNAR orders and Physician Orders for Life Sustaining
Treatment (POLST) forms compared with no such directives to improve outcomes (e.g.,
appropriate resuscitative efforts). One LOE 4 study
585
supported the use of advance directives in the context of a communitywide approach.
Three LOE 4 studies586, 587, 588 were neutral. Four studies (LOE 2
589
; LOE 4585, 590, 591) supported the use of advance directives. Two studies (LOE 1
592
; LOE 2
593
) suggested that the presence of advance directives reduced resuscitation rates in
patients.
In adult patients with cardiac arrest, 18 additional studies (LOE 1594, 595, 596,
597; LOE 2598, 599, 600; LOE 4601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606; LOE 5607, 608, 609, 610,
611) did not support the use of advance directives (e.g., living wills), compared
with no such directives, to improve outcome defined as resuscitative efforts based
on patient preference. Evidence from one LOE 3 study
612
suggested that the presence of a DNAR order decreased CPR rates.
No study was found that specifically addressed these issues in children.
Treatment recommendation
Standardised orders for limitations on life-sustaining treatments (e.g., DNAR, POLST)
should be considered to decrease the incidence of futile resuscitation attempts and
to ensure that adult patient wishes are honored. These orders should be specific,
detailed, transferable across healthcare settings, and easily understood. Processes,
protocols, and systems should be developed that fit within local cultural norms and
legal limitations to allow providers to honor patient wishes about resuscitation efforts.
Knowledge gaps
•
Implementation of DNAR/POLST in patients who move among different healthcare settings
(e.g., out-of-hospital and in-hospital).
•
Relationship between DNAR/POLST decisions and patient preferences.
•
Critical elements for prehospital DNAR.
Decisions before cardiac arrestEIT-016
EIT-016
In adults and children with cardiac arrest (prehospital [OHCA], in-hospital [IHCA]),
does existence and use of advance directives (e.g., “living wills” and Do Not Attempt
Resuscitation [DNAR] orders), compared with no such directives, improve outcomes (e.g.,
appropriate resuscitative efforts)?
Consensus on science
In adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, five studies (LOE 4580, 581, 582; LOE
5583, 584) supported the use of DNAR orders and Physician Orders for Life Sustaining
Treatment (POLST) forms compared with no such directives to improve outcomes (e.g.,
appropriate resuscitative efforts). One LOE 4 study
585
supported the use of advance directives in the context of a communitywide approach.
Three LOE 4 studies586, 587, 588 were neutral. Four studies (LOE 2
589
; LOE 4585, 590, 591) supported the use of advance directives. Two studies (LOE 1
592
; LOE 2
593
) suggested that the presence of advance directives reduced resuscitation rates in
patients.
In adult patients with cardiac arrest, 18 additional studies (LOE 1594, 595, 596,
597; LOE 2598, 599, 600; LOE 4601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606; LOE 5607, 608, 609, 610,
611) did not support the use of advance directives (e.g., living wills), compared
with no such directives, to improve outcome defined as resuscitative efforts based
on patient preference. Evidence from one LOE 3 study
612
suggested that the presence of a DNAR order decreased CPR rates.
No study was found that specifically addressed these issues in children.
Treatment recommendation
Standardised orders for limitations on life-sustaining treatments (e.g., DNAR, POLST)
should be considered to decrease the incidence of futile resuscitation attempts and
to ensure that adult patient wishes are honored. These orders should be specific,
detailed, transferable across healthcare settings, and easily understood. Processes,
protocols, and systems should be developed that fit within local cultural norms and
legal limitations to allow providers to honor patient wishes about resuscitation efforts.
Knowledge gaps
•
Implementation of DNAR/POLST in patients who move among different healthcare settings
(e.g., out-of-hospital and in-hospital).
•
Relationship between DNAR/POLST decisions and patient preferences.
•
Critical elements for prehospital DNAR.
Termination of resuscitation rules
EIT-003A
For adult patients in any setting, is there a clinical decision rule that enables
reliable prediction of ROSC (or futile resuscitation efforts)?
Consensus on science
One high-quality LOE P1 prospective study in adults
613
demonstrated that the “basic life support termination of resuscitation rule” (no shockable
rhythm, unwitnessed by EMS, and no ROSC) is predictive of death when applied by defibrillation-only
emergency medical technicians (EMTs). The survival rate with the application of this
rule is 0.5% (95% CI 0.2–0.9). Subsequent studies including two LOE P1 studies614,
615 showed external generalizability of this rule.
Additional adult studies (LOE P1
616
; LOE P2
617
; LOE P5
618
) showed associations with futility of certain variables such as no ROSC at scene,
nonshockable rhythm, unwitnessed arrest, no bystander CPR, call response time, and
patient demographics.
Two in-hospital studies (LOE P1
619
; LOE P2
620
) and one emergency department (ED) study (LOE P2)
621
showed that the reliability of termination of resuscitation rules is limited in these
settings.
Treatment recommendation
Prospectively validated termination of resuscitation rules such as the “basic life
support termination of resuscitation rule” are recommended to guide termination of
prehospital CPR in adults.
Other rules for various provider levels, including in-hospital providers, may be helpful
to reduce variability in decision-making; however, rules should be prospectively validated
before implementation.
Knowledge gaps
•
When to start CPR in neonatal, paediatric, and adult patients.
•
When to stop CPR in paediatric and neonatal patients.
•
Prospectively validated termination of resuscitation rule for advanced life support
providers.
Termination of resuscitation rulesEIT-003A
EIT-003A
For adult patients in any setting, is there a clinical decision rule that enables
reliable prediction of ROSC (or futile resuscitation efforts)?
Consensus on science
One high-quality LOE P1 prospective study in adults
613
demonstrated that the “basic life support termination of resuscitation rule” (no shockable
rhythm, unwitnessed by EMS, and no ROSC) is predictive of death when applied by defibrillation-only
emergency medical technicians (EMTs). The survival rate with the application of this
rule is 0.5% (95% CI 0.2–0.9). Subsequent studies including two LOE P1 studies614,
615 showed external generalizability of this rule.
Additional adult studies (LOE P1
616
; LOE P2
617
; LOE P5
618
) showed associations with futility of certain variables such as no ROSC at scene,
nonshockable rhythm, unwitnessed arrest, no bystander CPR, call response time, and
patient demographics.
Two in-hospital studies (LOE P1
619
; LOE P2
620
) and one emergency department (ED) study (LOE P2)
621
showed that the reliability of termination of resuscitation rules is limited in these
settings.
Treatment recommendation
Prospectively validated termination of resuscitation rules such as the “basic life
support termination of resuscitation rule” are recommended to guide termination of
prehospital CPR in adults.
Other rules for various provider levels, including in-hospital providers, may be helpful
to reduce variability in decision-making; however, rules should be prospectively validated
before implementation.
Knowledge gaps
•
When to start CPR in neonatal, paediatric, and adult patients.
•
When to stop CPR in paediatric and neonatal patients.
•
Prospectively validated termination of resuscitation rule for advanced life support
providers.
Quality of life
Part of the decision-making process in deciding for or against commencing resuscitation
is the likelihood of success of the resuscitation attempt and the quality of life
that can be expected following discharge from hospital.
Quality of life after resuscitation
EIT-006
In cardiac arrest patients (in-hospital and out-of-hospital), does resuscitation produce
a good quality of life for survivors after discharge from hospital?
In cardiac arrest patients (in-hospital and out-of-hospital), does resuscitation produce
a good quality of life for survivors after discharge from hospital?
Consensus on science
Eight prospective cohort studies (LOE P1)622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, two
‘follow-up of untreated control group in an RCT’ studies (LOE P2)630, 631, eight retrospective
cohort studies (LOE P3)632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638, 639, and 28 case series
(LOE P4)319, 326, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652,
653, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, 665 showed that quality
of life is good in cardiac arrest survivors.
One prospective cohort study (LOE P1)
666
, one ‘follow-up of untreated control group in an RCT’ study (LOE P2)
667
, three retrospective cohort studies (LOE P3)634, 668, 669, and 12 case series (LOE
P4)417, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680 showed that cardiac
arrest survivors experience problems in physical, cognitive, psychological, and social
functioning that impact on quality of life to a varying degree.
Seven case series (LOE P4)681, 682, 683, 684, 685, 686, 687 suggested that resuscitation
led to high rate of cognitive impairment and poorer quality of life. Four of these
seven studies evaluated populations in which cardiac arrest prognosis is considered
poor: nursing home patients,
681
octogenarians,
686
out-of hospital paediatric cardiac arrests with on-going CPR on hospital arrival,
683
and patients who remain comatose after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest.
687
Treatment recommendation
Resuscitation after cardiac arrest produces a good quality of life in most survivors.
There is little evidence to suggest that resuscitation leads to a large pool of survivors
with an unacceptable quality of life. Cardiac arrest survivors may experience problems
including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and difficulties with cognitive
function. Clinicians should be aware of these potential problems, screen for them,
and if found, treat them. Interventional resuscitation studies should be encouraged
to include a follow-up evaluation (ideally at least 6 months post-event) that assesses
general health-related quality of life with a validated instrument (e.g., Health Utility
Index 3, EQ5D, SF36), affective disorder (anxiety and depression), post-traumatic
stress disorder, and cognitive function.
Knowledge gaps
•
The best approach for clinicians to use to measure quality of life for patients after
resuscitation.
•
Consensus on a recommended set of QoL dimensions and measures to facilitate comparison
and integration of literature, and future research.
•
Long-term QoL studies of resuscitated children.
•
Impact on families of cardiac arrest survivors.
Quality of life after resuscitationEIT-006
EIT-006
In cardiac arrest patients (in-hospital and out-of-hospital), does resuscitation produce
a good quality of life for survivors after discharge from hospital?
Consensus on science
Eight prospective cohort studies (LOE P1)622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, two
‘follow-up of untreated control group in an RCT’ studies (LOE P2)630, 631, eight retrospective
cohort studies (LOE P3)632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638, 639, and 28 case series
(LOE P4)319, 326, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652,
653, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, 665 showed that quality
of life is good in cardiac arrest survivors.
One prospective cohort study (LOE P1)
666
, one ‘follow-up of untreated control group in an RCT’ study (LOE P2)
667
, three retrospective cohort studies (LOE P3)634, 668, 669, and 12 case series (LOE
P4)417, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680 showed that cardiac
arrest survivors experience problems in physical, cognitive, psychological, and social
functioning that impact on quality of life to a varying degree.
Seven case series (LOE P4)681, 682, 683, 684, 685, 686, 687 suggested that resuscitation
led to high rate of cognitive impairment and poorer quality of life. Four of these
seven studies evaluated populations in which cardiac arrest prognosis is considered
poor: nursing home patients,
681
octogenarians,
686
out-of hospital paediatric cardiac arrests with on-going CPR on hospital arrival,
683
and patients who remain comatose after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest.
687
Treatment recommendation
Resuscitation after cardiac arrest produces a good quality of life in most survivors.
There is little evidence to suggest that resuscitation leads to a large pool of survivors
with an unacceptable quality of life. Cardiac arrest survivors may experience problems
including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and difficulties with cognitive
function. Clinicians should be aware of these potential problems, screen for them,
and if found, treat them. Interventional resuscitation studies should be encouraged
to include a follow-up evaluation (ideally at least 6 months post-event) that assesses
general health-related quality of life with a validated instrument (e.g., Health Utility
Index 3, EQ5D, SF36), affective disorder (anxiety and depression), post-traumatic
stress disorder, and cognitive function.
Knowledge gaps
•
The best approach for clinicians to use to measure quality of life for patients after
resuscitation.
•
Consensus on a recommended set of QoL dimensions and measures to facilitate comparison
and integration of literature, and future research.
•
Long-term QoL studies of resuscitated children.
•
Impact on families of cardiac arrest survivors.