In Vivo Rapid Investigation of CRISPR-Based Base Editing Components in Escherichia coli (IRI-CCE): A Platform for Evaluating Base Editing Tools and Their Components

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Rapid assessment of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas)-based genome editing (GE) tools and their components is a critical aspect for successful GE applications in different organisms. In many bacteria, double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated by CRISPR/Cas tool generally cause cell death due to the lack of an efficient nonhomologous end-joining pathway and restricts its use. CRISPR-based DSB-free base editors (BEs) have been applied for precise nucleotide (nt) editing in bacteria, which does not need to make DSBs. However, optimization of newer BE tools in bacteria is challenging owing to the toxic effects of BE reagents expressed using strong promoters. Improved variants of two main BEs, cytidine base editor (CBE) and adenine base editor (ABE), capable of converting C to T and A to G, respectively, have been recently developed but yet to be tested for editing characteristics in bacteria. Here, we report a platform for in vivo rapid investigation of CRISPR-BE components in Escherichia coli (IRI-CCE) comprising a combination of promoters and terminators enabling the expression of nCas9-based BE and sgRNA to nontoxic levels, eventually leading to successful base editing. We demonstrate the use of IRI-CCE to characterize different variants of CBEs (PmCDA1, evoCDA1, APOBEC3A) and ABEs (ABE8e, ABE9e) for bacteria, exhibiting that each independent BE has its specific editing pattern for a given target site depending on protospacer length. In summary, CRISPR-BE components expressed without lethal effects on cell survival in the IRI-CCE allow an analysis of various BE tools, including cloned biopart modules and sgRNAs.

Related collections

Most cited references 60

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Kenneth Livak, Thomas D. Schmittgen (2001)

The two most commonly used methods to analyze data from real-time, quantitative PCR experiments are absolute quantification and relative quantification. Absolute quantification determines the input copy number, usually by relating the PCR signal to a standard curve. Relative quantification relates the PCR signal of the target transcript in a treatment group to that of another sample such as an untreated control. The 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method is a convenient way to analyze the relative changes in gene expression from real-time quantitative PCR experiments. The purpose of this report is to present the derivation, assumptions, and applications of the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. In addition, we present the derivation and applications of two variations of the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method that may be useful in the analysis of real-time, quantitative PCR data. Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).

0 comments Cited 24372 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage

Alexis Komor, Yongjoo Kim, Michael Packer … (2016)

Current genome-editing technologies introduce double-stranded (ds) DNA breaks at a target locus as the first step to gene correction. 1,2 Although most genetic diseases arise from point mutations, current approaches to point mutation correction are inefficient and typically induce an abundance of random insertions and deletions (indels) at the target locus from the cellular response to dsDNA breaks. 1,2 Here we report the development of base editing, a new approach to genome editing that enables the direct, irreversible conversion of one target DNA base into another in a programmable manner, without requiring dsDNA backbone cleavage or a donor template. We engineered fusions of CRISPR/Cas9 and a cytidine deaminase enzyme that retain the ability to be programmed with a guide RNA, do not induce dsDNA breaks, and mediate the direct conversion of cytidine to uridine, thereby effecting a C→T (or G→A) substitution. The resulting “base editors” convert cytidines within a window of approximately five nucleotides (nt), and can efficiently correct a variety of point mutations relevant to human disease. In four transformed human and murine cell lines, second- and third-generation base editors that fuse uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), and that use a Cas9 nickase targeting the non-edited strand, manipulate the cellular DNA repair response to favor desired base-editing outcomes, resulting in permanent correction of ∼15-75% of total cellular DNA with minimal (typically ≤ 1%) indel formation. Base editing expands the scope and efficiency of genome editing of point mutations.

0 comments Cited 1386 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage

Nicole M. Gaudelli, Alexis Komor, Holly A. Rees … (2017)

Summary The spontaneous deamination of cytosine is a major source of C•G to T•A transitions, which account for half of known human pathogenic point mutations. The ability to efficiently convert target A•T base pairs to G•C therefore could advance the study and treatment of genetic diseases. While the deamination of adenine yields inosine, which is treated as guanine by polymerases, no enzymes are known to deaminate adenine in DNA. Here we report adenine base editors (ABEs) that mediate conversion of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA. We evolved a tRNA adenosine deaminase to operate on DNA when fused to a catalytically impaired CRISPR-Cas9. Extensive directed evolution and protein engineering resulted in seventh-generation ABEs (e.g., ABE7.10), that convert target A•T to G•C base pairs efficiently (~50% in human cells) with very high product purity (typically ≥ 99.9%) and very low rates of indels (typically ≤ 0.1%). ABEs introduce point mutations more efficiently and cleanly than a current Cas9 nuclease-based method, induce less off-target genome modification than Cas9, and can install disease-correcting or disease-suppressing mutations in human cells. Together with our previous base editors, ABEs advance genome editing by enabling the direct, programmable introduction of all four transition mutations without double-stranded DNA cleavage.