2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of nurses and midwives‐led psychological interventions on reducing depression symptoms in the perinatal period: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          To evaluate the effectiveness of nurses and midwives‐led psychological interventions on the perinatal depressive symptoms.

          Design

          A systematic review and meta‐analysis based on the PRISMA guidelines.

          Methods

          Six databases were searched, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL. The search date range was before 30 September 2019. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to evaluate the quality of the included studies and Review Manager software 5.3 to conduct a meta‐analysis. The data were pooled using a random‐effect model.

          Results

          Studies ( N = 827) were retrieved with 12 studies included. Psychological interventions provided by nurses and midwives have a significant effect on reducing perinatal depressive symptoms (RR: 0.72, 95% CI [0.64–0.82]). Among the approaches of psychological intervention, supportive counselling was the most effective (RR: 0.58, 95% CI [0.42–0.80]). The best intensity of intervention was six to eight sessions (RR: 0.66, 95% CI [0.55–0.79]).

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

              Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tyaling@mail.cmu.edu.tw
                tzupeiyeh@mail.cmu.edu.tw
                Journal
                Nurs Open
                Nurs Open
                10.1002/(ISSN)2054-1058
                NOP2
                Nursing Open
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2054-1058
                15 January 2021
                September 2021
                : 8
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/nop2.v8.5 )
                : 2117-2130
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Public Health College of Public Health China Medical University Taichung Taiwan
                [ 2 ] Department of Nursing College of Nursing Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology Taichung Taiwan
                [ 3 ] Department of Nursing China Medical University Hospital Taichung Taiwan
                [ 4 ] School of Nursing and Graduate Institute of Nursing China Medical University Taichung Taiwan
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ya‐Ling Tzeng and Tzu‐Pei Yeh, School of Nursing and Graduate Institute of Nursing, China Medical University, Department of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, 91 Hseuh Shih Road, Taichung, Taiwan.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7805-9238
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7053-3668
                Article
                NOP2764
                10.1002/nop2.764
                8363390
                33452740
                579f1bdc-b730-4797-9fdc-88ada0293d1d
                © 2021 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 26 November 2020
                : 07 September 2020
                : 02 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 14, Words: 7432
                Funding
                Funded by: China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan
                Award ID: DMR‐105‐105
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.5 mode:remove_FC converted:13.08.2021

                depression symptoms,midwives,nurses,perinatal depression,psychological intervention,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article