Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dynamic Spectral Imaging Colposcopy Versus Regular Colposcopy in Women Referred With High-Grade Cytology: A Nonrandomized Prospective Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

          Objective

          The aim of the study was to evaluate the sensitivity of dynamic spectral imaging (DSI) colposcopy compared with regular colposcopy for women referred with high-grade cervical cytology.

          Methods

          In a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study, we included women referred for colposcopy at hospital gynecology clinics with high-grade cytology. Women were examined using either a regular or DSI colposcope. In both groups, colposcopists located 1 area viewed as most suspicious. In the DSI group, this was done before viewing the DSI map. Subsequently, an area was chosen based on the worst color of the DSI map, and further additional biopsies were taken. All women had 4 cervical biopsies taken, all analyzed separately. The main outcome was sensitivity to find cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).

          Results

          A total of 261 women were examined using DSI colposcopy, and 156 women were examined using regular colposcopy. The sensitivity for finding CIN2+ when using the DSI technology as an adjunctive technology was found to be 82.2% (95% CI = 75.9–87.4), based on an average of 1.4 biopsies. This was corresponding in sensitivity to 2 biopsies taken using regular colposcopy (80.3%; 95% CI = 72.3–86.8). There was no difference in sensitivity for CIN+ between the groups when 3 or more biopsies were taken.

          Conclusions

          We found that the DSI colposcope may help direct biopsy placement; however, the improvement is based on small differences in needed biopsies and the clinical significance of this may be small. Multiple biopsies were still superior.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy.

          To examine the influence that type of medical training and number of biopsies have on sensitivity of colposcopically guided biopsies. Among 408 women with an adequate enrollment colposcopy and a diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or cancer (CIN 3+) over 2 years in the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (ASCUS-LSIL) Triage Study, we evaluated factors influencing the sensitivity of the enrollment colposcopic procedure. We used contingency table analysis to examine confounding variables and chi(2) tests to ascertain statistical significance. Overall, 69.9% of women with a cumulative diagnosis of CIN 3+ had a "true-positive" enrollment colposcopically guided biopsy result of CIN 2 or worse (CIN 2+), the threshold that would trigger excisional therapy. The sensitivity of the procedure did not vary significantly by type of colposcopist. However, the sensitivity was significantly greater when the colposcopists took two or more biopsies instead of one (P<.01), a pattern observed across all types of colposcopists. Independent of the severity of the colposcopic impression, the frequency with which colposcopists took two or more biopsies instead of one varied (in descending order) from nurse practitioners to general gynecologists to gynecologic oncology fellows to gynecologic oncologists (P<.01). Colposcopy with guided biopsy or biopsies detects approximately two thirds of CIN 3+. Although the sensitivity of the procedure does not differ significantly by type of medical training, it is greater when two or more biopsies are taken.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse.

            The purpose of this study was to determine the relative importance of colposcopically directed biopsy, random biopsy, and endocervical curettage (ECC) in diagnosing > or =cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II. Study design During a screening study, 364 women with satisfactory colposcopy and > or =CIN II were diagnosed. All colposcopically detected lesions were biopsied. If colposcopy showed no lesion in a cervical quadrant, a random biopsy was obtained at the squamocolumnar junction in that quadrant. ECC was then performed. The diagnosis of > or =CIN II was made on a colposcopically directed biopsy in 57.1%, random biopsy in 37.4%, and ECC in 5.5% of women. The yield of > or =CIN II for random biopsy when cytology was high grade (17.6%) exceeded that when cytology was low grade (2.8%). One of 20 women diagnosed solely by ECC had invasive cancer. Even when colposcopy is satisfactory, ECC should be performed. If cytology is high grade, random biopsies should be considered.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy.

              Women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results are referred to colposcopy and biopsy for diagnosis of cervical cancer precursors (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSILs]). Colposcopy with a single biopsy can miss identification of HSILs. No systematic study has quantified the improved detection of HSIL by taking multiple lesion-directed biopsies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Low Genit Tract Dis
                J Low Genit Tract Dis
                JLGTD
                Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                1089-2591
                1526-0976
                April 2021
                15 January 2021
                : 25
                : 2
                : 113-118
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
                [2 ]Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
                [3 ]Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
                [4 ]Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
                [5 ]OPEN Open Patient data Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
                [6 ]Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
                [7 ]Department of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
                [8 ]Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
                [9 ]Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
                Author notes
                [*]Correspondence to: Berit Bargum Booth, MD, Skovlyvej 15, 8390 Randers, Denmark. E-mail: berit.booth@ 123456auh.rm.dk
                Article
                JLGTD_200002 00006
                10.1097/LGT.0000000000000586
                7984761
                33470739
                561a3f23-5380-4b19-bd33-8e79c478f64c
                Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the ASCCP.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Categories
                Diagnosis and Management HPV Associated Disease
                Custom metadata
                T
                TRUE

                cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,colposcopy,sensitivity

                Comments

                Comment on this article