22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development of a standardized histopathology scoring system using machine learning algorithms for intervertebral disc degeneration in the mouse model—An ORS spine section initiative

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mice have been increasingly used as preclinical model to elucidate mechanisms and test therapeutics for treating intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Several intervertebral disc (IVD) histological scoring systems have been proposed, but none exists that reliably quantitate mouse disc pathologies. Here, we report a new robust quantitative mouse IVD histopathological scoring system developed by building consensus from the spine community analyses of previous scoring systems and features noted on different mouse models of IDD. The new scoring system analyzes 14 key histopathological features from nucleus pulposus (NP), annulus fibrosus (AF), endplate (EP), and AF/NP/EP interface regions. Each feature is categorized and scored; hence, the weight for quantifying the disc histopathology is equally distributed and not driven by only a few features. We tested the new histopathological scoring criteria using images of lumbar and coccygeal discs from different IDD models of both sexes, including genetic, needle‐punctured, static compressive models, and natural aging mice spanning neonatal to old age stages. Moreover, disc sections from common histological preparation techniques and stains including H&E, SafraninO/Fast green, and FAST were analyzed to enable better cross‐study comparisons. Fleiss's multi‐rater agreement test shows significant agreement by both experienced and novice multiple raters for all 14 features on several mouse models and sections prepared using various histological techniques. The sensitivity and specificity of the new scoring system was validated using artificial intelligence and supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms, including artificial neural networks, k‐means clustering, and principal component analysis. Finally, we applied the new scoring system on established disc degeneration models and demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity of histopathological scoring changes. Overall, the new histopathological scoring system offers the ability to quantify histological changes in mouse models of disc degeneration and regeneration with high sensitivity and specificity.

          Abstract

          We have developed a new Mouse intErveRtebral disC histopathologY (MERCY) system using a step‐wise approach that included building consensus in the spine community, testing reliability using various mouse disc degeneration models for agreement by multiple raters, validating for high sensitivity and specificity using AI and machine learning algorithms, and applied on established models of murine disc degeneration. Hence, this new system can be broadly applied to quantify mouse IVD histopathology in disc degeneration and regeneration models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

          This paper presents a general statistical methodology for the analysis of multivariate categorical data arising from observer reliability studies. The procedure essentially involves the construction of functions of the observed proportions which are directed at the extent to which the observers agree among themselves and the construction of test statistics for hypotheses involving these functions. Tests for interobserver bias are presented in terms of first-order marginal homogeneity and measures of interobserver agreement are developed as generalized kappa-type statistics. These procedures are illustrated with a clinical diagnosis example from the epidemiological literature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention

            Low back pain is a very common symptom. It occurs in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries and all age groups from children to the elderly population. Globally, years lived with disability caused by low back pain increased by 54% between 1990 and 2015, mainly because of population increase and ageing, with the biggest increase seen in low-income and middle-income countries. Low back pain is now the leading cause of disability worldwide. For nearly all people with low back pain, it is not possible to identify a specific nociceptive cause. Only a small proportion of people have a well understood pathological cause-eg, a vertebral fracture, malignancy, or infection. People with physically demanding jobs, physical and mental comorbidities, smokers, and obese individuals are at greatest risk of reporting low back pain. Disabling low back pain is over-represented among people with low socioeconomic status. Most people with new episodes of low back pain recover quickly; however, recurrence is common and in a small proportion of people, low back pain becomes persistent and disabling. Initial high pain intensity, psychological distress, and accompanying pain at multiple body sites increases the risk of persistent disabling low back pain. Increasing evidence shows that central pain-modulating mechanisms and pain cognitions have important roles in the development of persistent disabling low back pain. Cost, health-care use, and disability from low back pain vary substantially between countries and are influenced by local culture and social systems, as well as by beliefs about cause and effect. Disability and costs attributed to low back pain are projected to increase in coming decades, in particular in low-income and middle-income countries, where health and other systems are often fragile and not equipped to cope with this growing burden. Intensified research efforts and global initiatives are clearly needed to address the burden of low back pain as a public health problem.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain.

              To perform a systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain, and to examine the influence that case definition, prevalence period, and other variables have on prevalence. We conducted a new systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain that included general population studies published between 1980 and 2009. A total of 165 studies from 54 countries were identified. Of these, 64% had been published since the last comparable review. Low back pain was shown to be a major problem throughout the world, with the highest prevalence among female individuals and those aged 40-80 years. After adjusting for methodologic variation, the mean ± SEM point prevalence was estimated to be 11.9 ± 2.0%, and the 1-month prevalence was estimated to be 23.2 ± 2.9%. As the population ages, the global number of individuals with low back pain is likely to increase substantially over the coming decades. Investigators are encouraged to adopt recent recommendations for a standard definition of low back pain and to consult a recently developed tool for assessing the risk of bias of prevalence studies. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dahiac@hss.edu
                Journal
                JOR Spine
                JOR Spine
                10.1002/(ISSN)2572-1143
                JSP2
                JOR Spine
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                2572-1143
                17 July 2021
                June 2021
                : 4
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/jsp2.v4.2 )
                : e1164
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Orthopedic Soft Tissue Research Program Hospital for Special Surgery New York City New York USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Cell & Developmental Biology Weill Cornell Medicine Graduate School of Medical Sciences New York City New York USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 4 ] University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Washington University in St Louis Missouri USA
                [ 6 ] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan
                [ 7 ] Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 8 ] Department of Physiology & Pharmacology Bone & Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada
                [ 9 ] School of Biomedical Sciences The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Hong Kong
                [ 10 ] Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology The University of Hong Kong‐Shenzhen Hospital Shenzhen Guangdong China
                [ 11 ] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
                [ 12 ] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Hong Kong
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Chitra L. Dahia, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, 515 East 71st Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

                Email: dahiac@ 123456hss.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-3921
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3683-9791
                Article
                JSP21164
                10.1002/jsp2.1164
                8313179
                34337338
                54ab7568-95cc-4e9d-8c0a-1f61bdbaf1f9
                © 2021 The Authors. JOR Spine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 01 June 2021
                : 28 March 2021
                : 07 June 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 17, Tables: 5, Pages: 32, Words: 17978
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases , doi 10.13039/100000069;
                Award ID: R01 AR055655
                Award ID: R01 AR064733
                Award ID: R01 AR074813
                Award ID: R01AR065530
                Award ID: R01AR077145
                Funded by: NIH Office of the Director , doi 10.13039/100000052;
                Award ID: S10OD026763
                Funded by: Research Grant Council of Hong Kong
                Award ID: GRF17126518
                Award ID: GRF17126319
                Funded by: RGC European Union—Hong Kong Research and Innovation Cooperation Co‐funding Mechanism
                Award ID: E‐HKU703/18
                Funded by: Hong Kong Research Grants Council
                Award ID: T12‐708/12N
                Funded by: S & L Marx Foundation
                Funded by: Starr Foundation , doi 10.13039/100009784;
                Categories
                Special Issue Article
                Special Issue Articles: Jor Spine Histopathology Series
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.4 mode:remove_FC converted:26.07.2021

                aging,degeneration,pre‐clinical models,structure‐function relationships

                Comments

                Comment on this article