7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Roles of Health Literacy in Relation to Social Determinants of Health and Recommendations for Informatics-Based Interventions: Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Health literacy (HL) is the ability to make informed decisions using health information. As health data and information availability increase due to online clinic notes and patient portals, it is important to understand how HL relates to social determinants of health (SDoH) and the place of informatics in mitigating disparities.

          Objective

          This systematic literature review aims to examine the role of HL in interactions with SDoH and to identify feasible HL-based interventions that address low patient understanding of health information to improve clinic note-sharing efficacy.

          Methods

          The review examined 2 databases, Scopus and PubMed, for English-language articles relating to HL and SDoH. We conducted a quantitative analysis of study characteristics and qualitative synthesis to determine the roles of HL and interventions.

          Results

          The results (n=43) were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively for study characteristics, the role of HL, and interventions. Most articles (n=23) noted that HL was a result of SDoH, but other articles noted that it could also be a mediator for SdoH (n=6) or a modifiable SdoH (n=14) itself.

          Conclusions

          The multivariable nature of HL indicates that it could form the basis for many interventions to combat low patient understandability, including 4 interventions using informatics-based solutions. HL is a crucial, multidimensional skill in supporting patient understanding of health materials. Designing interventions aimed at improving HL or addressing poor HL in patients can help increase comprehension of health information, including the information contained in clinic notes shared with patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

              Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Online J Public Health Inform
                Online J Public Health Inform
                JMIR
                Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1947-2579
                2024
                20 March 2024
                : 16
                : e50898
                Affiliations
                [1 ] College of Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH United States
                [2 ] School of Medicine Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH United States
                [3 ] University of Cincinnati Libraries Research and Data Services University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH United States
                [4 ] Department of Human Development and Family Studies The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL United States
                [5 ] The Family Resiliency Center College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL United States
                [6 ] Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL United States
                [7 ] School of Criminal Justice University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Danny T Y Wu wutz@ 123456ucmail.uc.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6808-2653
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8193-6430
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-177X
                https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7347-9591
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7036-8247
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3217-0392
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7608-5969
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-3754
                Article
                v16i1e50898
                10.2196/50898
                10993137
                38506914
                4de91608-7d9e-4c1d-9438-de4011404e29
                ©Shwetha Bindhu, Anunita Nattam, Catherine Xu, Tripura Vithala, Tiffany Grant, Jacinda K Dariotis, Hexuan Liu, Danny T Y Wu. Originally published in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics (https://ojphi.jmir.org/), 20.03.2024.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://ojphi.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 17 July 2023
                : 23 November 2023
                : 28 January 2024
                : 31 January 2024
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                health literacy,social determinants of health,sdoh,social determinants,systematic review,patient education,health education,health information,information needs,information comprehension,patient counseling,barriers to care,language proficiency

                Comments

                Comment on this article