High-Volume Image-Guided Injections in Achilles and Patellar Tendinopathy in a Young Active Military Population: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background:

Chronic Achilles and patellar tendinopathy are a significant burden in physically active populations. High-volume image-guided injection (HVIGI) proposes to strip away associated neovascularity, disrupt painful nerve ingrowth, and facilitate rehabilitation.

Purpose:

To investigate the efficacy of HVIGI with and without steroid relative to placebo.

Study Design:

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods:

A total of 62 participants were recruited between May 25, 2016, and March 5, 2020. Participants were men aged 18 to 55 years with Achilles or patellar tendinopathy of at least 6-month chronicity that had not improved with nonoperative management (including physical therapy and shockwave therapy), with ultrasound evidence of neovascularization, tendon thickening, and echogenic changes. They were assigned to the following groups: control (3 mL of subcutaneous 0.5% bupivacaine), HVIGI (10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 30 mL of normal saline, ultrasound-guided between tendon and underlying fat pad), or HVIGI with steroid (HVIGIwSteroid; 0.25 mL of 100 mg/mL hydrocortisone). Clinicians and assessors were blinded. All participants were supervised through a pain-guided progressive loading program for 6 months postinjection. The main outcome measures were the Victoria Institute of Sport Assessments (VISA) for Achilles and patellar tendinopathy and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 6 months postinjection.

Results:

The VISA score improved by a mean of 22.8 points (95% CI, 10.4-35.3 points; effect size [ES], 1.51) in the control group (n = 21), 18.6 points (95% CI, 9.1-28.0 points; ES, 1.31) in the HVIGI group (n = 21), and 18.5 points (95% CI, 3.4-33.6 points; ES, 0.88) in the HVIGIwSteroid group (n = 20). VAS pain improved by a mean of 15 points (interquartile range [IQR], –38.75, 8 points; ES, 0.39) in controls, 13 points (IQR,–34.0, 3.75 points; ES, 0.47) in the HVIGI group, and 27 points (IQR,–38.0, –1.0 points; ES, 0.54) in the HVIGIwSteroid group. The main effects were significant for time ( P < .001) but not group ( P ≥ .48), with no group × time interaction ( P = .71). One participant was lost to follow-up from each group, multiple imputation was used for missing data points. No adverse events occurred.

Conclusion:

Study findings did not demonstrate superiority of HVIGI over control injection.

Registration:

EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT: 2015-003587-36).