1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of dietary supplementation of Enterococcus faecium postbiotics on growth performance and intestinal health of growing male mink

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent studies have demonstrated that postbiotics possess bioactivities comparable to those of probiotics. Therefore, our experiment aimed to evaluate the effects of postbiotics derived from Enterococcus faecium on the growth performance and intestinal health of growing male minks. A total of 120 growing male minks were randomly assigned to 4 groups, each with 15 replicates of 2 minks. The minks in the 4 groups were fed a basal diet supplemented with 0 (control), 0.05, 0.1, and 0.15% postbiotics derived from E. faecium (PEF), respectively. Compared to the control, PEF improved feed/gain (F/G) during the first 4 weeks and the entire 8 weeks of the study ( p < 0.05); in addition, 0.1% PEF improved average daily gain (ADG) during the first 4 weeks and the entire 8 weeks of the study ( p < 0.05), while 0.15% PEF improved ADG during the first 4 weeks of the study ( p < 0.05). Consequently, 0.1% PEF minks displayed greater body weight (BW) at weeks 4 and 8 ( p < 0.05), and 0.15% PEF minks had greater BW at week 4 ( p < 0.05) than minks in the control. Furthermore, compared to the control, both 0.05 and 0.1% PEF enhanced the apparent digestibility of crude protein (CP) and ether extract (EE) ( p < 0.05) in the initial 4 weeks, while both 0.1 and 0.15% PEF enhanced the apparent digestibility of CP and DM in the final 4 weeks ( p < 0.05). Additionally, trypsin activity was elevated in the 0.1 and 0.15% PEF groups compared to the control ( p < 0.05). In terms of intestinal morphology, PEF increased the villus height and villus/crypt (V/C) in the jejunum ( p < 0.05), and both 0.1 and 0.15% PEF decreased the crypt depth and increased the villus height and V/C in the duodenum ( p < 0.05) compared to the control group. Supplementation with 0.1% PEF increased the SIgA levels but decreased the IL-2, IL-8, and TNF-α levels in the jejunum ( p < 0.05). Compared to the control, E. faecium postbiotics decreased the relative abundances of Serratia and Fusobacterium ( p < 0.05). In conclusion, the results indicate that the growth performance, digestibility, immunity, and intestine development of minks are considerably affected by E. faecium postbiotics. In particular, dietary supplementation with 0.1% E. faecium postbiotics provides greater benefits than supplementation with 0.05 and 0.15%.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The gut microbiota--masters of host development and physiology.

          Establishing and maintaining beneficial interactions between the host and its associated microbiota are key requirements for host health. Although the gut microbiota has previously been studied in the context of inflammatory diseases, it has recently become clear that this microbial community has a beneficial role during normal homeostasis, modulating the host's immune system as well as influencing host development and physiology, including organ development and morphogenesis, and host metabolism. The underlying molecular mechanisms of host-microorganism interactions remain largely unknown, but recent studies have begun to identify the key signalling pathways of the cross-species homeostatic regulation between the gut microbiota and its host.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics

            In 2019, the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) convened a panel of experts specializing in nutrition, microbial physiology, gastroenterology, paediatrics, food science and microbiology to review the definition and scope of postbiotics. The term ‘postbiotics’ is increasingly found in the scientific literature and on commercial products, yet is inconsistently used and lacks a clear definition. The purpose of this panel was to consider the scientific, commercial and regulatory parameters encompassing this emerging term, propose a useful definition and thereby establish a foundation for future developments. The panel defined a postbiotic as a “preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host”. Effective postbiotics must contain inactivated microbial cells or cell components, with or without metabolites, that contribute to observed health benefits. The panel also discussed existing evidence of health-promoting effects of postbiotics, potential mechanisms of action, levels of evidence required to meet the stated definition, safety and implications for stakeholders. The panel determined that a definition of postbiotics is useful so that scientists, clinical triallists, industry, regulators and consumers have common ground for future activity in this area. A generally accepted definition will hopefully lead to regulatory clarity and promote innovation and the development of new postbiotic products. Postbiotics are emerging substances prepared from inactivated microorganisms, in contrast to probiotics, which must be administered alive. This Consensus Statement outlines a definition for the term ‘postbiotics’ as determined by an expert panel convened by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Review of antibiotic resistance in China and its environment

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2701229/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2721351/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                10 July 2024
                2024
                : 11
                : 1409127
                Affiliations
                College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University , Qingdao, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Izhar Hyder Qazi, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan

                Reviewed by: Yanzhu Zhu, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, China

                Chao Xu, Jilin Agricultural University, China

                Zheng Ruan, Nanchang University, China

                *Correspondence: Lihua Wang, lhwang@ 123456qau.edu.cn
                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2024.1409127
                11266192
                39051012
                4d29b10a-1fba-40e7-a3ad-30c85a8448a8
                Copyright © 2024 Cao, Sun, Ren, Jiang, Chen, Li and Wang.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 March 2024
                : 18 June 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 6, Equations: 1, References: 75, Pages: 12, Words: 8619
                Funding
                Funded by: Shandong Province
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Shandong Province Agricultural Innovation Team (SDAIT-21).
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Animal Nutrition and Metabolism

                mink,postbiotics,enterococcus faecium,nutrients digestibility,intestinal morphology,immune status,intestinal microbiota

                Comments

                Comment on this article