6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Relative Stability of Network States in Boolean Network Models of Gene Regulation in Development

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Progress in cell type reprogramming has revived the interest in Waddington’s concept of the epigenetic landscape. Recently researchers developed the quasi-potential theory to represent the Waddington’s landscape. The Quasi-potential U( x) , derived from interactions in the gene regulatory network (GRN) of a cell, quantifies the relative stability of network states, which determine the effort required for state transitions in a multi-stable dynamical system. However, quasi-potential landscapes, originally developed for continuous systems, are not suitable for discrete-valued networks which are important tools to study complex systems. In this paper, we provide a framework to quantify the landscape for discrete Boolean networks (BNs). We apply our framework to study pancreas cell differentiation where an ensemble of BN models is considered based on the structure of a minimal GRN for pancreas development. We impose biologically motivated structural constraints (corresponding to specific type of Boolean functions) and dynamical constraints (corresponding to stable attractor states) to limit the space of BN models for pancreas development. In addition, we enforce a novel functional constraint corresponding to the relative ordering of attractor states in BN models to restrict the space of BN models to the biological relevant class. We find that BNs with canalyzing/sign-compatible Boolean functions best capture the dynamics of pancreas cell differentiation. This framework can also determine the genes' influence on cell state transitions, and thus can facilitate the rational design of cell reprogramming protocols.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0430773
          1191
          Biosystems
          BioSystems
          Bio Systems
          0303-2647
          1872-8324
          3 December 2016
          07 March 2016
          Apr-May 2016
          01 April 2017
          : 142-143
          : 15-24
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA
          [2 ]Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, UC Santa Barbara, California, USA
          [3 ]The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India
          [4 ]The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy
          [5 ]Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
          Author notes
          [§ ]Corresponding author ( shuang@ 123456systemsbiology.org )
          [*]

          These authors contributed equally to this work

          Article
          PMC5149109 PMC5149109 5149109 nihpa768491
          10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.03.002
          5149109
          26965665
          4cc712be-8180-4be7-b570-24098bdc42d7
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Multistable dynamical system,Cell differentiation,Gene regulatory network (GRN),Epigenetic landscape,Attractor states,Boolean network (BN)

          Comments

          Comment on this article