32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Progress on Optimizing Miscanthus Biomass Production for the European Bioeconomy: Results of the EU FP7 Project OPTIMISC

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 3 , 3 , 2 , 2 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 2 , 1 , 7 , 1 , 8 , 5 , 9 , 8 , 2 , 11 , 8 , 12 , 7 , 3 , 1 , 13 , 1
      Frontiers in Plant Science
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      Miscanthus, genotypes, stress tolerance, marginal land, value chains, costs, LCA, bioeconomy

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper describes the complete findings of the EU-funded research project OPTIMISC, which investigated methods to optimize the production and use of miscanthus biomass. Miscanthus bioenergy and bioproduct chains were investigated by trialing 15 diverse germplasm types in a range of climatic and soil environments across central Europe, Ukraine, Russia, and China. The abiotic stress tolerances of a wider panel of 100 germplasm types to drought, salinity, and low temperatures were measured in the laboratory and a field trial in Belgium. A small selection of germplasm types was evaluated for performance in grasslands on marginal sites in Germany and the UK. The growth traits underlying biomass yield and quality were measured to improve regional estimates of feedstock availability. Several potential high-value bioproducts were identified. The combined results provide recommendations to policymakers, growers and industry. The major technical advances in miscanthus production achieved by OPTIMISC include: (1) demonstration that novel hybrids can out-yield the standard commercially grown genotype Miscanthus x giganteus; (2) characterization of the interactions of physiological growth responses with environmental variation within and between sites; (3) quantification of biomass-quality-relevant traits; (4) abiotic stress tolerances of miscanthus genotypes; (5) selections suitable for production on marginal land; (6) field establishment methods for seeds using plugs; (7) evaluation of harvesting methods; and (8) quantification of energy used in densification (pellet) technologies with a range of hybrids with differences in stem wall properties. End-user needs were addressed by demonstrating the potential of optimizing miscanthus biomass composition for the production of ethanol and biogas as well as for combustion. The costs and life-cycle assessment of seven miscanthus-based value chains, including small- and large-scale heat and power, ethanol, biogas, and insulation material production, revealed GHG-emission- and fossil-energy-saving potentials of up to 30.6 t CO 2eq C ha −1y −1 and 429 GJ ha −1y −1, respectively. Transport distance was identified as an important cost factor. Negative carbon mitigation costs of –78€ t −1 CO 2eq C were recorded for local biomass use. The OPTIMISC results demonstrate the potential of miscanthus as a crop for marginal sites and provide information and technologies for the commercial implementation of miscanthus-based value chains.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Abiotic and biotic stresses and changes in the lignin content and composition in plants.

          Lignin is a polymer of phenylpropanoid compounds formed through a complex biosynthesis route, represented by a metabolic grid for which most of the genes involved have been sequenced in several plants, mainly in the model-plants Arabidopsis thaliana and Populus. Plants are exposed to different stresses, which may change lignin content and composition. In many cases, particularly for plant-microbe interactions, this has been suggested as defence responses of plants to the stress. Thus, understanding how a stressor modulates expression of the genes related with lignin biosynthesis may allow us to develop study-models to increase our knowledge on the metabolic control of lignin deposition in the cell wall. This review focuses on recent literature reporting on the main types of abiotic and biotic stresses that alter the biosynthesis of lignin in plants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cell wall remodeling under abiotic stress

            Plants exposed to abiotic stress respond to unfavorable conditions on multiple levels. One challenge under drought stress is to reduce shoot growth while maintaining root growth, a process requiring differential cell wall synthesis and remodeling. Key players in this process are the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and peroxidases, which initially cross-link phenolic compounds and glycoproteins of the cell walls causing stiffening. The function of ROS shifts after having converted all the peroxidase substrates in the cell wall. If ROS-levels remain high during prolonged stress, OH°-radicals are formed which lead to polymer cleavage. In concert with xyloglucan modifying enzymes and expansins, the resulting cell wall loosening allows further growth of stressed organs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              More productive than maize in the Midwest: How does Miscanthus do it?

              In the first side-by-side large-scale trials of these two C(4) crops in the U.S. Corn Belt, Miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus) was 59% more productive than grain maize (Zea mays). Total productivity is the product of the total solar radiation incident per unit land area and the efficiencies of light interception (epsilon(i)) and its conversion into aboveground biomass (epsilon(ca)). Averaged over two growing seasons, epsilon(ca) did not differ, but epsilon(i) was 61% higher for Miscanthus, which developed a leaf canopy earlier and maintained it later. The diurnal course of photosynthesis was measured on sunlit and shaded leaves of each species on 26 dates. The daily integral of leaf-level photosynthetic CO(2) uptake differed slightly when integrated across two growing seasons but was up to 60% higher in maize in mid-summer. The average leaf area of Miscanthus was double that of maize, with the result that calculated canopy photosynthesis was 44% higher in Miscanthus, corresponding closely to the biomass differences. To determine the basis of differences in mid-season leaf photosynthesis, light and CO(2) responses were analyzed to determine in vivo biochemical limitations. Maize had a higher maximum velocity of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylation, velocity of phosphoenolpyruvate regeneration, light saturated rate of photosynthesis, and higher maximum quantum efficiency of CO(2) assimilation. These biochemical differences, however, were more than offset by the larger leaf area and its longer duration in Miscanthus. The results indicate that the full potential of C(4) photosynthetic productivity is not achieved by modern temperate maize cultivars.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/357540/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/381514/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/65848/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/83922/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/386407/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/373846/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/364021/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/291929/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/204230/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/368935/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/365766/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/382923/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/368759/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/387734/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/351808/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/386853/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/386359/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/376645/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/389372/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/368774/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/82478/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/351830/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/91802/overview
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                18 November 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 1620
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Biobased Products and Energy Crops, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim Stuttgart, Germany
                [2] 2Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth, UK
                [3] 3Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands
                [4] 4Dienst Landbouwkundig Onderzoek, Wageningen UR Plant Breeding Wageningen, Netherlands
                [5] 5Julius Kühn-Institut Braunschweig, Germany
                [6] 6ANNA - The Agency for Sustainable Management of Agricultural Landscape Freiburg, Germany
                [7] 7Department of Plant Physiology, Russian State Agrarian University–Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy Moscow, Russia
                [8] 8Plant Sciences Unit, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research Melle, Belgium
                [9] 9Blankney Estates Blankney, UK
                [10] 10The Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK
                [11] 11Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Konya Food and Agriculture University Konya, Turkey
                [12] 12German Agrarian Centre Potash, Ukraine
                [13] 13Dongying Agricultural Institute Dongying, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Soren K. Rasmussen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

                Reviewed by: Hao Peng, Washington State University, USA; Qing-Yong Yang, Huazhong Agricultural University, China

                *Correspondence: Iris Lewandowski Iris_Lewandowski@ 123456uni-hohenheim.de

                This article was submitted to Crop Science and Horticulture, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2016.01620
                5114296
                27917177
                412a86b4-5539-48da-8f6d-7da30b3e5c62
                Copyright © 2016 Lewandowski, Clifton-Brown, Trindade, van der Linden, Schwarz, Müller-Sämann, Anisimov, Chen, Dolstra, Donnison, Farrar, Fonteyne, Harding, Hastings, Huxley, Iqbal, Khokhlov, Kiesel, Lootens, Meyer, Mos, Muylle, Nunn, Özgüven, Roldán-Ruiz, Schüle, Tarakanov, van der Weijde, Wagner, Xi and Kalinina.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 11 August 2016
                : 13 October 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 9, Equations: 0, References: 44, Pages: 23, Words: 17331
                Funding
                Funded by: Seventh Framework Programme 10.13039/501100004963
                Award ID: 289159
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                miscanthus,genotypes,stress tolerance,marginal land,value chains,costs,lca,bioeconomy
                Plant science & Botany
                miscanthus, genotypes, stress tolerance, marginal land, value chains, costs, lca, bioeconomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article