18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Catalytically inactive, purified RNase H1: A specific and sensitive probe for RNA–DNA hybrid imaging

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Crossley et al. demonstrate that GFP-tagged, catalytically inactive RNase H1 protein is a versatile tool for imaging cellular R-loops. They also show that it is significantly more specific than the commonly used S9.6 antibody, which detects considerable nonspecific signal.

          Abstract

          R-loops are three-stranded nucleic acid structures with both physiological and pathological roles in cells. R-loop imaging generally relies on detection of the RNA–DNA hybrid component of these structures using the S9.6 antibody. We show that the use of this antibody for imaging can be problematic because it readily binds to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in vitro and in vivo, giving rise to nonspecific signal. In contrast, purified, catalytically inactive human RNase H1 tagged with GFP (GFP-dRNH1) is a more specific reagent for imaging RNA–DNA hybrids. GFP-dRNH1 binds strongly to RNA–DNA hybrids but not to dsRNA oligonucleotides in fixed human cells and is not susceptible to binding endogenous RNA. Furthermore, we demonstrate that purified GFP-dRNH1 can be applied to fixed cells to detect hybrids after their induction, thereby bypassing the need for cell line engineering. GFP-dRNH1 therefore promises to be a versatile tool for imaging and quantifying RNA–DNA hybrids under a wide range of conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          R-Loops as Cellular Regulators and Genomic Threats

          During transcription, the nascent RNA strand can base pair with its template DNA, displacing the non-template strand as ssDNA and forming a structure called an R-loop. R-loops are common across many domains of life and cause DNA damage in certain contexts. In this review, we summarize recent results implicating R-loops as important regulators of cellular processes such as transcription termination, gene regulation, and DNA repair. We also highlight recent work suggesting that R-loops can be problematic to cells as blocks to efficient transcription and replication that trigger the DNA damage response. Finally, we discuss how R-loops may contribute to cancer, neurodegeneration, and inflammatory diseases and compare the available next-generation sequencing-based approaches to map R-loops genome wide.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            R Loops: From Physiological to Pathological Roles

            DNA-RNA hybrids play a physiological role in cellular processes, but often, they represent non-scheduled co-transcriptional structures with a negative impact on transcription, replication and DNA repair. Accumulating evidence suggests that they constitute a source of replication stress, DNA breaks and genome instability. Reciprocally, DNA breaks facilitate DNA-RNA hybrid formation by releasing the double helix torsional conformation. Cells avoid DNA-RNA accumulation by either preventing or removing hybrids directly or by DNA repair-coupled mechanisms. Given the R-loop impact on chromatin and genome organization and its potential relation with genetic diseases, we review R-loop homeostasis as well as their physiological and pathological roles.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              BRCA1 Recruitment to Transcriptional Pause Sites Is Required for R-Loop-Driven DNA Damage Repair

              Summary The mechanisms contributing to transcription-associated genomic instability are both complex and incompletely understood. Although R-loops are normal transcriptional intermediates, they are also associated with genomic instability. Here, we show that BRCA1 is recruited to R-loops that form normally over a subset of transcription termination regions. There it mediates the recruitment of a specific, physiological binding partner, senataxin (SETX). Disruption of this complex led to R-loop-driven DNA damage at those loci as reflected by adjacent γ-H2AX accumulation and ssDNA breaks within the untranscribed strand of relevant R-loop structures. Genome-wide analysis revealed widespread BRCA1 binding enrichment at R-loop-rich termination regions (TRs) of actively transcribed genes. Strikingly, within some of these genes in BRCA1 null breast tumors, there are specific insertion/deletion mutations located close to R-loop-mediated BRCA1 binding sites within TRs. Thus, BRCA1/SETX complexes support a DNA repair mechanism that addresses R-loop-based DNA damage at transcriptional pause sites.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J Cell Biol
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                06 September 2021
                07 July 2021
                : 220
                : 9
                : e202101092
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
                [2 ] Biological Systems and Engineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA
                [3 ] Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Karlene A. Cimprich: cimprich@ 123456stanford.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-205X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-5335
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3239-5724
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1937-2969
                Article
                jcb.202101092
                10.1083/jcb.202101092
                8266564
                34232287
                41263f73-13fa-40f9-999c-8ea30b38102f
                © 2021 Crossley et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 January 2021
                : 24 May 2021
                : 07 June 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005189;
                Award ID: 5455-17
                Funded by: Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001033;
                Award ID: 61-1755
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: R01 GM119334
                Award ID: GM126600
                Award ID: R01 GM120607
                Award ID: P01 CA092584
                Funded by: V Foundation for Cancer Research, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001368;
                Award ID: D2018.017
                Categories
                Tools
                RNA biology

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article