51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Dietary Reference Values for nutrients Summary report

      European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
      EFSA Supporting Publications
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre

          (2010)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            World Health Organization equations have shortcomings for predicting resting energy expenditure in persons from a modern, affluent population: generation of a new reference standard from a retrospective analysis of a German database of resting energy expenditure.

            Reference standards for resting energy expenditure (REE) are widely used. Current standards are based on measurements made in the first part of the past century in various races and locations. The aim of the present study was to investigate the application of the World Health Organization (WHO) equations from 1985 in healthy subjects living in a modern, affluent society in Germany and to generate a new formula for predicting REE. The study was a cross-sectional and retrospective analysis of data on REE and body composition obtained from 2528 subjects aged 5-91 y in 7 different centers between 1985 and 2002. Mean REE varied between 5.63 and 8.07 MJ/d in males and between 5.35 and 6.46 MJ/d in females. WHO prediction equations systematically overestimated REE at low REE values but underestimated REE at high REE values. There were significant and independent effects of sex, age, body mass or fat-free mass, and fat mass on REE. Multivariate regression analysis explained up to 75% of the variance in REE. Two prediction formulas including weight, sex, and age or fat-free mass, fat mass, sex, and age, respectively, were generated in a subpopulation and cross-validated in another subpopulation. Significant deviations were still observed for underweight and normal-weight subjects. REE prediction formulas for specific body mass index groups reduced the deviations. The normative data for REE from the Institute of Medicine underestimated our data by 0.3 MJ/d. REE prediction by WHO formulas systematically over- and underestimates REE. REE prediction from a weight group-specific formula is recommended in underweight subjects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for energy

              (2013)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EFSA Supporting Publications
                EFS3
                EFSA Supporting Publications
                Wiley
                23978325
                23978325
                December 2017
                December 2017
                : 14
                : 12
                Article
                10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.e15121
                4112f956-5af0-4dfc-a394-b658d593c285
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article