Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that is accompanied by demyelination
and axonal damage resulting in neurological deficits. Remyelination is the natural
endogenous repair mechanism of demyelinated axons and it is supposed to protect axons/neurons
from degeneration and thus the patient from progressive disability (Franklin and Ffrench-Constant,
2008). Current therapeutics for patients with multiple sclerosis are to some extent
very effective in inhibiting neuroinflammation and demyelination. However, to date
there are no substances available that can enhance remyelination. Remyelination is
the result of recruitment/proliferation of new oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPC)
and differentiation into mature myelin producing oligodendrocytes (Franklin and Ffrench-Constant,
2008). These processes are supported by many factors and signals and failure at any
stage might lead to repair failure. Strategies to enhance myelin repair are either
the promotion of endogenous repair mechanisms via modulation of OPC proliferation
and oligodendrocyte differentiation or the transplantion of myelinating cells into
lesions. Due to the multiloculated process in multiple sclerosis and the ethical problems
with the cell source, the latter is less favoured. The endogenous promotion of remyelination
could be achieved by several approaches such as: (1) treatment with factors that directly
influence OPC proliferation, migration and/or differentiation (e.g., growth factors,
cytokines), (2) creation of a repair promoting environment in the central nervous
system (CNS) via modulation of resident glial cells or peripheral immune cells, (3)
modulation of inhibitory factors of OPC proliferation, migration and/or differentiation
(e.g., LINGO-1, myelin), or (4) protection of oligodendroglial cells. Alternatively,
transplantation of exogenous cells such as mesenchymal stem cells is in the focus
of current research on repair mechanisms. To date several approaches have been successfully
tested in animal models of remyelination, however, only few clinical trials were performed
in patients with multiple sclerosis. Inhibiting LINGO-1 presents a promising option
to enhance myelin repair in patients with multiple sclerosis. Treatment with LINGO-1
antagonists showed beneficial effects on remyelination by induction of OPC differentiation
in animal models (Mi et al., 2009) and a first clinical trial (phase II) in patients
with first optic neuritis has just been completed. Preliminary results indicate that
the (primary) endpoint, recovery of the optic nerve latency measured by visual evoked
potentials, has been reached, however, there was no effect on other secondary outcome
parameters like visual acuity or change in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness
measured by optic coherence tomography (OCT) (Biogen, press release 08.01.2015). Thus,
there is still further clinical need for the development of remyelinating/regenerating
treatments for patients with multiple sclerosis.
Recently, we identified a new mechanism to enhance myelin repair via the choline pathway
(Skripuletz et al., 2015). We have tested the substance cytidine 5′-diphosphocholine
(citicoline, CDP-choline) for possible neuroprotective and regenerative properties
in two animal models of multiple sclerosis. First, we found that CDP-choline ameliorated
clinical symptoms of murine myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced experimental
autoimmune encephalomyelitis (MOG-EAE) when it was applied from the first day of disease
induction or from the onset of disease. Histopathological analyses at later time points
revealed beneficial effects on oligodendrocytes, myelination, and axons. In our experiments,
CDP-choline failed to show beneficial effects on the disease course when it was applied
after the peak of disease. We hypothesised that the effects of CDP-choline might be
driven by modulation of OPC proliferation which occurs before the peak of disease
in this animal model. We have thus utilized an additional model of CNS remyelination,
the toxic cuprizone model. The cuprizone model provides the advantage to investigate
remyelination processes without the influence of peripheral immune cells which do
not play a key role in this model. Furthermore, the cuprizone model offers consistent,
anatomically reproducible and well detectable processes of OPC regeneration and remyelination
(Skripuletz et al., 2011). We did not find any beneficial effects of CDP-choline on
the course of cuprizone induced demyelination and oligodendrocyte loss. However, during
remyelination CDP-choline enhanced myelin repair and reversed motor coordination deficits
as shown by the beam walking test. The improved remyelination was accompanied by higher
numbers of proliferating OPC which resulted in higher numbers of mature oligodendrocytes.
Additional in vitro experiments confirmed that CDP-choline increases the proliferation
rate of OPC. Thus modulation of OPC proliferation seems to be an important mechanism
of action of CDP-choline. Nevertheless, this mechanism may not be exclusively operated.
Additional external confirmation and corroboration of our results comes from not fully
published studies in EAE where CDP-choline was shown to be beneficial in EAE in Lewis
rats (Grieb, 2015). However, these studies did not look into the mechanisms how this
effect was achieved.
CDP-choline has been shown to exert neuroprotective effects in in vitro experiments
as well as in animal models of stroke, brain injury, and neurodegenerative diseases
(Grieb, 2014). One hypothesis of action is the stimulation of brain phospholipid synthesis.
In the CNS, endogenous CDP-choline is an intermediate compound in the biosynthesis
of the cell membrane phospholipid phosphatidylcholine (lecithin) and acetylcholine
(Adibhatla and Hatcher, 2002). During pathological conditions, the amount of endogenous
CDP-choline might be limited in the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine and acetylcholine
and thus the substance might be limited during repair processes. Exogenously applied
CDP-choline might be a possible tool to promote regeneration. CDP-choline given parenterally
or orally quickly degrades into its products cytidine and choline which can cross
the blood-brain barrier separately (Grieb, 2014). In the CNS both products can be
resynthesized to CDP-choline and might thus increase the biosynthesis of phosphatidylcholine.
In the synthesis pathway of phosphatidylcholine, CDP-choline is converted directly
with diacyglyceride (DAG) into phosphatidylcholine and cytidine-mono-phosphate (CMP)
in a reaction catalysed by the enzyme 1,2-diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase
(CPT) (Hjelmstad and Bell, 1991). However, the exact mechanisms of action of CDP-choline
in animal disease models are not well understood and other pathophysiological mechanisms
are possible. Indeed, in our work we found regenerative functions of exogenous CDP-choline
that were promoted via increasing the proliferation rate of OPC (
Figure 1
).
Figure 1
Proposed action of cytidine 5′-diphosphocholine (citicoline, CDP-choline) during remyelination.
(A) During remyelination, oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPC) proliferate, migrate
into the demyelinated area, and finally differentiate into myelinating oligodendrocytes.
(B) In the presence of CDP-choline, proliferation of OPC is enhanced and thus more
OPC can migrate into the demyelinated area and more axons are remyelinated.
Furthermore, it should be noted that the neuroprective effects of CDP-choline which
were found in animal disease models of stroke and brain injury could not be reproduced
in humans. In the COBRIT (Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment) trial a 90-day treatment
of daily citicoline (2,000 mg) or placebo was performed in 1,213 patients (Zafonte
et al., 2012). In patients with traumatic brain injury, CDP-choline failed to improve
the functional and cognitive status as compared to placebo controls. In the International
Citicoline Trial on Acute Stroke (ICTUS), 2,298 patients with moderate to severe acute
ischaemic stroke either received CDP-choline (2,000 mg per day intravenously during
the first 3 days, thereafter 1,000 mg per days orally for a total of 6 weeks) or placebo
(Davalos et al., 2012). In this trial, CDP-choline did dot show beneficial effects
as compared to placebo as well. These results were surprising and might be partly
explained by different methodological evaluations of the disease. Furthermore, there
is a big difference in the doses used in animals and humans. In animal experiments,
usually doses of 500 mg/kg are applied, which would be equivalent to 35,000 mg CDP-choline
per day in a 70 kg person. However, in clinical trials doses of 2,000 mg per day were
used.
In our opinion, the disappointing results in clinical trials in stroke and brain injury
do not neccessarily imply negative results in demyelinating disorders such as multiple
sclerosis. In these diseases, there is a completely different mechanism of lesion
induction. In contrast to stroke, multiple sclerosis lesions are accompanied by demyelination
while axons/neurons are not completely damaged during the onset of disease. Subsequently
during repair processes, new OPC proliferate and differentiate into mature oligodendrocytes
and build new myelin sheaths.
To date, CDP-choline has been studied in several thousand humans and showed a favourable
safety profile (Grieb, 2014; Adibhatla and Hatcher, 2002). Adverse effects were rare
and consisted of stomach pain, diarrhea, and headaches. As shown in rodent experiments,
there is a lack of toxicity of CDP-choline. The median lethal dose (LD50) is very
high with 8,000 mg/kg orally applied CDP-choline in mice and rats (Grieb, 2014). This
dose would correspond to 560,000 mg CDP-choline in a 70 kg person, which is almost
not possible to ingest.
In conclusion, CDP-choline showed repair promoting functions in two animal models
of multiple sclerosis with a new mechanism of action. Due to the known beneficial
safety profile, CDP-choline may be a promising substance for patients with multiple
sclerosis, which is worth further investigations, e.g., as add-on therapy to established
immunomodulators.