10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC SCREENING IN PREGNANCY

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Benefits of Ultrasonic Screening of a Pregnant Population

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predictive value of ultrasound measurement in early pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.

            Early fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) measurements were obtained with ultrasound in 1062 women attending for antenatal care; a random half had the results withheld from the obstetricians. Of the 1026 women who were sure of the dates of their last normal menstrual period, 829 (81%) were found to have appropriate biparietal diameter measurements, in 3% the pregnancy was more than 2 weeks further advanced and in 14% more than 2 weeks less than calculated. In 30% of the women whose results were intended to be withheld, the code had to be broken because of clinical concern. There were no differences in fetal outcome (birthweight centile, Apgar score at 1 min and perinatal mortality) in the women whose BPD results were known compared with those whose results were withheld from the obstetrician. But a significantly larger number of labours were induced for suspected growth retardation when the gestational age was known.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Lancet
                The Lancet
                Elsevier BV
                01406736
                July 1984
                July 1984
                : 324
                : 8396
                : 207-211
                Article
                10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90492-6
                6146762
                3f999ff0-e6a5-4595-b2c3-b56c86cf2a9c
                © 1984

                http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content5,735

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors65