6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of isometric resistance training on resting blood pressure: individual participant data meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Previous meta-analyses based on aggregate group-level data report antihypertensive effects of isometric resistance training (IRT). However, individual participant data meta-analyses provide more robust effect size estimates and permit examination of demographic and clinical variables on IRT effectiveness.

          Methods:

          We conducted a systematic search and individual participant data (IPD) analysis, using both a one-step and two-step approach, of controlled trials investigating at least 3 weeks of IRT on resting systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure.

          Results:

          Anonymized individual participant data were provided from 12 studies (14 intervention group comparisons) involving 326 participants (52.7% medicated for hypertension); 191 assigned to IRT and 135 controls, 25.2% of participants had diagnosed coronary artery disease. IRT intensity varied (8–30% MVC) and training duration ranged from 3 to 12 weeks. The IPD (one-step) meta-analysis showed a significant treatment effect for the exercise group participants experiencing a reduction in resting SBP of −6.22 mmHg (95% CI −7.75 to −4.68; P < 0.00001); DBP of −2.78 mmHg (95% CI −3.92 to −1.65; P = 0.002); and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of −4.12 mmHg (95% CI −5.39 to −2.85; P < 0.00001). The two-step approach yielded similar results for change in SBP −7.35 mmHg (−8.95 to −5.75; P < 0.00001), DBP MD −3.29 mmHg (95% CI −5.12 to −1.46; P = 0.0004) and MAP MD −4.63 mmHg (95% CI −6.18 to −3.09: P < 0.00001). Sub-analysis revealed that neither clinical, medication, nor demographic participant characteristics, or exercise program features, modified the IRT treatment effect.

          Conclusion:

          This individual patient analysis confirms a clinically meaningful and statistically significant effect of IRT on resting SBP, DBP and mean arterial blood pressure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

          The Lancet, 380(9859), 2224-2260
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hypertension Canada’s 2018 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children

              Hypertension Canada provides annually updated, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults and children. This year, the adult and pediatric guidelines are combined in one document. The new 2018 pregnancy-specific hypertension guidelines are published separately. For 2018, 5 new guidelines are introduced, and 1 existing guideline on the blood pressure thresholds and targets in the setting of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke is revised. The use of validated wrist devices for the estimation of blood pressure in individuals with large arm circumference is now included. Guidance is provided for the follow-up measurements of blood pressure, with the use of standardized methods and electronic (oscillometric) upper arm devices in individuals with hypertension, and either ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure monitoring in individuals with white coat effect. We specify that all individuals with hypertension should have an assessment of global cardiovascular risk to promote health behaviours that lower blood pressure. Finally, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor combination should be used in place of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in individuals with heart failure (with ejection fraction < 40%) who are symptomatic despite appropriate doses of guideline-directed heart failure therapies. The specific evidence and rationale underlying each of these guidelines are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Hypertens
                J. Hypertens
                JHYPE
                Journal of Hypertension
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                0263-6352
                1473-5598
                October 2019
                15 March 2019
                : 37
                : 10
                : 1927-1938
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
                [b ]Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph
                [c ]Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
                [d ]Department of Life and Sports Sciences, University of Greenwich
                [e ]Sport and Exercise Science, University of Northampton, UK
                [f ]Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina, at Charolotte, North Carolina, USA
                [g ]Universidade Nove de Julho, Brazil
                [h ]School of Human and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, UK
                [i ]Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                [j ]Department of Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, Philadelphia, USA
                [k ]University of Glasgow, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Professor Neil A. Smart, PhD, School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. Tel: +61 2 6773 4076; fax: +61 2 6773 5011; e-mail: nsmart2@ 123456une.edu.au
                Article
                JH-D-18-00949
                10.1097/HJH.0000000000002105
                6727950
                30889048
                3a6c9058-5b86-4703-9b88-a626070eb4dd
                Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                : 18 October 2018
                : 07 March 2019
                : 20 February 2019
                Categories
                Reviews and Meta-Analyses
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                blood pressure,hypertension,individual patient data meta-analysis,isometric exercise

                Comments

                Comment on this article