9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Sex and Gender in Neurodegenerative Diseases

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Neurodegenerative Diseases: 1.9 Impact Factor I 5.9 CiteScore I 0.648 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The Utility of Administrative Data for Surveillance of Comorbidity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Validation Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Although comorbidity is important in multiple sclerosis (MS), few validated methods for its assessment exist. We validated and applied administrative case definitions for several comorbidities in MS. Methods: Using provincial administrative data we identified persons with MS and a matched general population cohort. Case definitions for chronic lung disease (CLD), epilepsy, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and migraine were developed using administrative data, and validated against medical records. We applied these definitions to estimate the age-standardized prevalence of these comorbidities in the MS and matched cohorts. Results: Versus medical records, administrative case definitions showed moderate agreement for CLD (ĸ = 0.41), migraine (ĸ = 0.51), and epilepsy (ĸ = 0.44), fair agreement for IBS (ĸ = 0.36) and could not be calculated for IBD (small sample size). The 2005 prevalence of CLD was similar in the MS (15.6%) and general populations (14.4%). The prevalence of the remaining comorbidities was higher in the MS than the general populations: epilepsy (4.12 vs. 1.12%), IBD (0.78 vs. 0.65%), IBS (12.2 vs. 6.80%) and migraine (23.0 vs. 16.5%). Conclusions: Administrative data are valid for tracking CLD, epilepsy, and migraine in MS. The prevalence of epilepsy, IBD, IBS and migraine is increased in MS versus the general population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Immune activation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

          We set out to test the hypothesis that irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by an augmented cellular immune response with enhanced production of proinflammatory cytokines. We further aimed to explore whether symptoms and psychiatric comorbidity in IBS are linked to the release of proinflammatory cytokines. We characterized basal and Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced cytokine production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 55 IBS patients (18 mixed-, 17 constipation-, 20 diarrhea-predominant) and 36 healthy controls (HCs). PBMCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation and cultured for 24 hours with or without (1 ng/mL) LPS. Cytokine production (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha, interleukin [IL]-1beta, and IL-6) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Abdominal symptoms and psychiatric comorbidities were assessed by using the validated Bowel Disease Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. IBS patients showed significantly (P < .017) higher baseline TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, and LPS-induced IL-6 levels compared with HCs. Analyzing IBS subgroups, all cytokine levels were significantly (P < .05) higher in diarrhea-predominant IBS (D-IBS) patients, whereas constipation-predominant IBS patients showed increased LPS-induced IL-1beta levels compared with HCs. Baseline TNF-alpha and LPS-induced TNF-alpha and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients reporting more than 3 bowel movements per day, urgency, watery stools, and pain associated with diarrhea compared with patients without these symptoms (all P < .05). LPS-induced TNF-alpha production was associated significantly (r = 0.59, P < .001) with anxiety in patients with IBS. Patients with D-IBS display enhanced proinflammatory cytokine release, and this may be associated with symptoms and anxiety.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Irritable bowel syndrome in the United States: prevalence, symptom patterns and impact.

            The impact of irritable bowel syndrome, a gastrointestinal motility disorder, is underestimated and poorly quantified, as clinicians may see only a minority of sufferers. To determine the prevalence, symptom patterns and impact of irritable bowel syndrome in the US. This two-phase community survey used quota sampling and random-digit telephone dialing (screening interview) to identify individuals with medically diagnosed irritable bowel syndrome or individuals not formally diagnosed, but fulfilling irritable bowel syndrome diagnostic criteria (Manning, Rome I or II). Information on irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, general health status, lifestyle and impact of symptoms on individuals' lives was collected using in-depth follow-up interviews. Data were also collected for healthy controls identified in the screening interviews. The total prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in 5009 screening interviews was 14.1% (medically diagnosed: 3.3%; undiagnosed, but meeting irritable bowel syndrome criteria: 10.8%). Abdominal pain/discomfort was the most common symptom prompting consultation. Most sufferers (74% medically diagnosed; 63% undiagnosed) reported alternating constipation and diarrhoea. Previously diagnosed gastrointestinal disorders occurred more often in sufferers than non-sufferers. Irritable bowel syndrome sufferers had more days off work (6.4 vs. 3.0) and days in bed, and reduced activities to a greater extent than non-sufferers. Most (76.6%) irritable bowel syndrome sufferers in the US are undiagnosed. Irritable bowel syndrome has a substantial impact on sufferers' well-being and health, with considerable socioeconomic consequences.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Validation of a Self-Report Comorbidity Questionnaire for Multiple Sclerosis

              Background/Aims: Researchers increasingly recognize the high frequency of comorbidity in multiple sclerosis (MS) and the negative impact on quality of life and disability, but little work has evaluated methods of comorbidity measurement in MS. We aimed to validate a self-report questionnaire for assessing comorbidity in MS. Methods: Patients with MS were recruited from the MS Clinic in Winnipeg, Canada and the Mellen Center (Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) from October 2008 to 2009. Using a questionnaire, participants reported the presence or absence of 36 comorbidities, sociodemographic characteristics, and disability status. Abstractors blinded to questionnaire results collected data regarding the comorbidities of interest and their treatments. Using the medical record as the gold standard, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the questionnaire data. To measure agreement we calculated kappa (ĸ) statistics. Results: We enrolled 404 participants. Agreement between self-report and medical records was high (ĸ >0.82) for diabetes and hypertension; substantial (ĸ = 0.62–0.80) for hyperlipidemia, thyroid disease, glaucoma, and lung disease; moderate (ĸ = 0.43–0.56) for osteoporosis, irritable bowel syndrome, migraine, depression, heart disease, and anxiety disorders. Agreement was slight to fair for the remaining comorbidities. Conclusions: Self-report is a valid way to capture comorbidities affecting MS patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NED
                Neuroepidemiology
                10.1159/issn.0251-5350
                Neuroepidemiology
                S. Karger AG
                0251-5350
                1423-0208
                2013
                February 2013
                23 October 2012
                : 40
                : 2
                : 85-92
                Affiliations
                Departments of aInternal Medicine and bCommunity Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man., cFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine and dSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, and eSurveillance and Assessment, Alberta Health and Wellness, Edmonton, Alta., fDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, and gResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Que., hDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., iDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., and jDepartments of Psychiatry and Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada
                Author notes
                *Ruth Ann Marrie, MD, PhD, Health Sciences Center, GF-533, 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9 (Canada), E-Mail rmarrie@hsc.mb.ca
                Article
                343188 Neuroepidemiology 2013;40:85–92
                10.1159/000343188
                23095571
                36d52d6b-6679-413a-ba98-cbf2f797262c
                © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 06 July 2012
                : 30 August 2012
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Methods in Neuroepidemiology

                Geriatric medicine,Neurology,Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurosciences,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
                Administrative data,Validation,Prevalence,Migraine,Multiple sclerosis,Lung disease,Comorbidity inflammatory bowel disease,Epilepsy,Irritable bowel syndrome

                Comments

                Comment on this article