9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Treatment of Severe Amlodipine Toxicity With Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Amlodipine is a long-acting calcium channel blocker of the dihydropyridine class and is more than 90% protein-bound. Toxicity results in bradycardia, hypotension, atrioventricular and bundle branch block, decreased cardiac inotropy, and profound vasodilation. 1 We report a severe intentional ingestion in a pediatric patient requiring extracorporeal life support (ECLS) who was treated with molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The recommendations in “Guidelines for Reporting Case Studies on Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisonings: Methodology” were followed, as feasible. 2 Case Presentation Our patient is a 14-year-old girl with a history of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypertension, and depression. She presented to the emergency center of our community hospital with lethargy and hypotension, 4 hours after ingestion of a month’s supply of her home dose of 15 mg amlodipine per day (approximately 450 mg). She weighed 42 kg and was 157 cm tall. Her baseline creatinine was 1.62 mg/dl (estimated glomerular filtration rate of 46 ml/min per 1.73 m2). She was intubated in the emergency center and suffered a hypotensive, bradycardic cardiac arrest with return of spontaneous circulation after 15 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. She was initially admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at the community hospital on epinephrine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin infusions. Electrocardiogram showed complete heart block with accelerated junctional rhythm and prolonged QTc of 595 ms. Due to ongoing clinical deterioration, she was then transferred to the main campus pediatric intensive care unit where extracorporeal therapies were available, arriving approximately 9 hours after initial presentation. Veno-arterial ECMO was initiated for refractory hypotension via femoral-femoral approach, 15 hours after ingestion. Lactate on admission was 5 mmol/l, which peaked to 10.4 mmol/l 6 hours after ingestion. On admission, her pH was 7.15, bicarbonate was 14 mmol/l, and creatinine was 2.4 mg/dl. Toxicology was consulted and she was started on both high-dose insulin drip at 1 unit/kg per hour and calcium chloride infusion. Amlodipine is highly protein-bound and not dialyzable through conventional hemodialysis. Given her severity, we elected to optimize toxin removal by extracorporeal treatments in addition to conventional medical management. Nephrology initiated albumin-augmented dialysis with MARS immediately after starting ECMO, approximately 20 hours after ingestion. MARS was performed in series with the veno-arterial ECMO circuit. MARS monitor was used in conjunction with a continuous renal replacement therapy machine in continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration mode with 2000 ml/1.73 m2 per hour of clearance. Blood and albumin flow rates were 150 ml/min each. Twenty percent albumin solution was used in the MARS circuit. Commercial MARS kits contain high-flux membranes of a 2.1 m2 MARS albumin filter across which albumin-augmented dialysis occurs, in series with a 1.2 m2 water-soluble regular dialyzer. Commercial bicarbonate-based dialysate and replacement solutions were used with appropriate electrolyte replacement. We performed 3 MARS procedures in our patient with reductions in serum amlodipine levels over time with each procedure. However, clearance was not linear, and levels rose between procedures, likely due to the high initial tissue penetration of the drug and the subsequent liberation of drug from tissues back into the bloodstream after procedures were completed. Improvements in hemodynamic stability were observed during and after each procedure, as measured by the Vasoactive Inotropic Score. The Vasoactive Inotropic Score, first described in postoperative pediatric cardiac patients, is a marker of illness severity, and calculated using the highest dosing of epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, vasopressin, milrinone, and norepinephrine infusions. First MARS treatment started on hospital day 1 and lasted for 11 hours before circuit clotting. It was restarted on day 2 for 8 hours when the circuit clotted again. Third MARS treatment, started on the third day, lasted for 26 hours. Serum amlodipine levels were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Reported therapeutic serum levels range from 2 to 25 ng/ml and our patient had a peak amlodipine level of 340 ng/ml before MARS initiation (Figure 1). Figure 1 Graphical depiction of serum amlodipine levels and Vasoactive Inotropic Scores (VIS) as temporally related to MARS treatments. ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; MARS, molecular adsorbent recirculating system. On hospital day 2, the heart block resolved, lactate decreased to 2 mmol/l, and pH normalized. She was weaned off epinephrine and continued on norepinephrine and vasopressin infusions, which were gradually weaned. MARS was discontinued after clinical improvement on day 4. There were no unanticipated adverse events noted specifically related to MARS. She was decannulated from ECMO on day 5 and was off all vasopressors on day 7. She maintained urine output ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 ml/kg per hour while on ECMO with additional fluid removal through ultrafiltration on ECMO. She required continuous renal replacement therapy for uremia from days 9 to 15, after which she did not require further renal replacement therapy. Discussion Treatment Modalities for Amlodipine Ingestion Initial treatment of calcium channel blocker poisoning is aimed at gastrointestinal decontamination. In more severe cases, administration of vasopressors, atropine, i.v. calcium, and extracorporeal life support is required. Drug levels can be lowered with hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy and/or i.v. infusions of lipid emulsion. 3 Amlodipine is highly protein-bound and conventional modes of dialysis would not effectively improve drug clearance. MARS and Its Use in Toxicology MARS has been proposed for the management of acute poisoning with or without liver failure. 4 Using the MARS circuit, protein-bound toxins diffuse across the membrane of a high-flux dialyzer (with a molecular cutoff of approximately 50 kDa) from the blood and into an albumin solution. This albumin solution is then cleaned of its bound toxins by passage through an activated carbon adsorber and an anion exchanger placed in series in the albumin circuit. In addition, albumin is used to prime both sides of the MARS dialyzer, which allows albumin to coat the deep crypts of the membrane surface and aids in clearance of protein-bound substances in the blood. There are case reports of using extracorporeal liver support to treat calcium channel blocker overdose.5, 6, 7, 8 Three individuals in cardiogenic shock from diltiazem and verapamil poisoning were treated with albumin dialysis. Another case involved a 70-year-old with diltiazem overdose, 5 and a third described a patient with overdose of amlodipine/valsartan therapy. 6 All reported individuals showed approximately 50% decreases in their serum drug levels: amlodipine 200 to 90 ng/ml after 12 hours, 6 diltiazem 2.66 to 1.40 mg/l and 8.58 to 5.67 mg/l after 4 to 6 hours, and verapamil 2.20 to 1.03 mg/l after 4 hours of therapy. 7 Four cases have been published in which plasmapheresis was performed on adults with calcium channel blocker overdose to decrease drug concentrations and improve hemodynamics.9, 10, 11 Case reports exist for hemoperfusion, 12 charcoal hemoperfusion, 13 and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration .14, 15 ECMO for Hemodynamic Support in Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose Durward et al. 16 first described a case of an adolescent who ingested toxic amounts of diltiazem. She developed cardiac standstill and was supported on ECMO for 48 hours with good recovery. A systematic review on treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning found that among all treatment modalities, high-dose insulin and ECLS were the interventions associated with improved survival. 8 MARS and ECMO Combined ECLS was initiated in our patient primarily for hemodynamic support but also for toxin removal. Sparks and colleagues 17 published their experience looking at survival in adults with multiorgan failure on ECMO, with and without MARS. They found that MARS therapy in patients on ECMO (n = 14 patients) safely accelerated recovery of liver function and improved survival to wean from ECMO, without increasing complications. For our patient already on ECLS, the addition of MARS did not add a significant burden or risk to the patient above the inherent risks of ECLS (e.g., catheter placement, blood product exposure, anticoagulation). To our knowledge, this is the first description on the use of MARS in tandem with ECMO for a pediatric patient, and for the use of calcium channel blocker toxicity in pediatrics. Limitations Our patient presented to a facility without ECLS support and the delay in transfer and initiating therapy could have adversely affected her outcome. The extent to which her preexisting renal disease might have influenced her drug metabolism and clinical course cannot be determined. The effect of the ECMO circuit on volume of distribution of amlodipine is unknown, as is the degree to which the ECMO circuit affects clearance by MARS. We do not know when the cartridges and albumin solution became saturated in order to guide replacement. Amlodipine levels were not available to use in real time so could not guide therapy by allowing purification dose to be titrated. Extremely high levels of >300 ng/ml possibly could be outside the limits for the assay. Conclusion Amlodipine is not dialyzable via conventional dialysis, but can be removed using albumin-augmented high cutoff circuits. MARS can be safely used in pediatric patients for extracorporeal treatments in tandem with ECMO. It would be a reasonable therapeutic option for amlodipine toxicity, in conjunction with medical therapies (Table 1). Table 1 Teaching points 1. Amlodipine is a long-acting calcium channel blocker of the di-hydropyridine class 2. Amlodipine is highly protein-bound and not dialyzable through conventional hemodialysis 3. Treatment of toxicity includes vasopressor support, i.v. calcium, intralipids, and high-dose insulin-dextrose therapies 4. In very severe cases, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) maybe needed for hemodynamic support 5. Albumin-augmented dialysis can be used for clearance of protein-bound drugs 6. The molecular adsorbent recirculation system can be run in tandem with the ECMO circuit 7. Drug levels are often not available in real time and hence treatment needs to be based on clinical examination 8. Extremely high drug levels may be outside the limits for an assay and may not be accurately measured Disclosure All the authors declared no competing interests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: A systematic review

          Context Calcium channel blocker poisoning is a common and sometimes life-threatening ingestion. Objective To evaluate the reported effects of treatments for calcium channel blocker poisoning. The primary outcomes of interest were mortality and hemodynamic parameters. The secondary outcomes included length of stay in hospital, length of stay in intensive care unit, duration of vasopressor use, functional outcomes, and serum calcium channel blocker concentrations. Methods Medline/Ovid, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, TOXLINE, International pharmaceutical abstracts, Google Scholar, and the gray literature up to December 31, 2013 were searched without time restriction to identify all types of studies that examined effects of various treatments for calcium channel blocker poisoning for the outcomes of interest. The search strategy included the following Keywords: [calcium channel blockers OR calcium channel antagonist OR calcium channel blocking agent OR (amlodipine or bencyclane or bepridil or cinnarizine or felodipine or fendiline or flunarizine or gallopamil or isradipine or lidoflazine or mibefradil or nicardipine or nifedipine or nimodipine or nisoldipine or nitrendipine or prenylamine or verapamil or diltiazem)] AND [overdose OR medication errors OR poisoning OR intoxication OR toxicity OR adverse effect]. Two reviewers independently selected studies and a group of reviewers abstracted all relevant data using a pilot-tested form. A second group analyzed the risk of bias and overall quality using the STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) checklist and the Thomas tool for observational studies, the Institute of Health Economics tool for Quality of Case Series, the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and the modified NRCNA (National Research Council for the National Academies) list for animal studies. Qualitative synthesis was used to summarize the evidence. Of 15,577 citations identified in the initial search, 216 were selected for analysis, including 117 case reports. The kappa on the quality analysis tools was greater than 0.80 for all study types. Results The only observational study in humans examined high-dose insulin and extracorporeal life support. The risk of bias across studies was high for all interventions and moderate to high for extracorporeal life support. High-dose insulin. High-dose insulin (bolus of 1 unit/kg followed by an infusion of 0.5–2.0 units/kg/h) was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and lower mortality, at the risks of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia (low quality of evidence). Extracorporeal life support. Extracorporeal life support was associated with improved survival in patients with severe shock or cardiac arrest at the cost of limb ischemia, thrombosis, and bleeding (low quality of evidence). Calcium, dopamine, and norepinephrine. These agents improved hemodynamic parameters and survival without documented severe side effects (very low quality of evidence). 4-Aminopyridine. Use of 4-aminopyridine was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and survival in animal studies, at the risk of seizures. Lipid emulsion therapy. Lipid emulsion was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and survival in animal models of intravenous verapamil poisoning, but not in models of oral verapamil poisoning. Other studies. Studies on decontamination, atropine, glucagon, pacemakers, levosimendan, and plasma exchange reported variable results, and the methodologies used limit their interpretation. No trial was documented in humans poisoned with calcium channel blockers for Bay K8644, CGP 28932, digoxin, cyclodextrin, liposomes, bicarbonate, carnitine, fructose 1,6-diphosphate, PK 11195, or triiodothyronine. Case reports were only found for charcoal hemoperfusion, dialysis, intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella device and methylene blue. Conclusions The treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning is supported by low-quality evidence drawn from a heterogeneous and heavily biased literature. High-dose insulin and extracorporeal life support were the interventions supported by the strongest evidence, although the evidence is of low quality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Massive diltiazem overdose treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

            To describe a case of massive diltiazem overdose with a good outcome achieved after early and aggressive supportive therapy. Case report. Pediatric Critical Care Unit. Sixteen-year-old adolescent girl. A 16-yr-old adolescent girl presented to the emergency department 6 hrs after the intentional ingestion of 40 300-mg sustained-release diltiazem tablets (12 g of Cardura CD). She was hypotensive and required a glucagon and epinephrine infusion despite initial fluid resuscitation with saline and intravenous calcium (1 g). Multiple asystolic cardiac arrests ensued which became increasingly refractory to high-dose epinephrine. Hemodynamic support was achieved with a 48-hr period of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for atrial standstill. Severe multiorgan dysfunction ensued (cardiac, neurologic, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hematologic, and metabolic). Plasma diltiazem and its metabolites were measured and its half-life was reported between 28 and 48 hrs. A sustained decline in plasma diltiazem levels and its metabolites was not observed after two periods of charcoal hemoperfusion. Recovery of organ function occurred with sinus rhythm noted on the ninth day. The patient made a full recovery and was discharged from the critical care unit after 15 days. Although massive calcium channel blocker overdose can produce profound and prolonged cardiac or multiorgan dysfunction, its toxic effects may be reversible. Supportive therapy, particularly of the cardiovascular system, is the most important goal.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Guidelines for Reporting Case Studies on Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisonings: Methodology

              A literature review performed by the EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup highlighted deficiencies in the existing literature, especially the reporting of case studies. Although general reporting guidelines exist for case studies, there are none in the specific field of extracorporeal treatments in toxicology. Our goal was to construct and propose a checklist that systematically outlines the minimum essential items to be reported in a case study of poisoned patients undergoing extracorporeal treatments. Through a modified two-round Delphi technique, panelists (mostly chosen from the EXTRIP workgroup) were asked to vote on the pertinence of a set of items to identify those considered minimally essential for reporting complete and accurate case reports. Furthermore, independent raters validated the clarity of each selected items between each round of voting. All case reports containing data on extracorporeal treatments in poisoning published in Medline in 2011 were reviewed during the external validation rounds. Twenty-one panelists (20 from the EXTRIP workgroup and an invited expert on pharmacology reporting guidelines) participated in the modified Delphi technique. This group included journal editors and experts in nephrology, clinical toxicology, critical care medicine, emergency medicine, and clinical pharmacology. Three independent raters participated in the validation rounds. Panelists voted on a total of 144 items in the first round and 137 items in the second round, with response rates of 96.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Twenty case reports were evaluated at each validation round and the independent raters' response rate was 99.6% and 98.8% per validation round. The final checklist consists of 114 items considered essential for case study reporting. This methodology of alternate voting and external validation rounds was useful in developing the first reporting guideline for case studies in the field of extracorporeal treatments in poisoning. We believe that this guideline will improve the completeness and transparency of published case reports and that the systematic aggregation of information from case reports may provide early signals of effectiveness and/or harm, thereby improving healthcare decision-making.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney International Reports
                Elsevier
                2468-0249
                28 September 2018
                February 2019
                28 September 2018
                : 4
                : 2
                : 346-349
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
                [2 ]Renal Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence: Venessa Pinto, Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, MC: E.1420, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. vlpinto@ 123456bcm.edu
                Article
                S2468-0249(18)30217-1
                10.1016/j.ekir.2018.09.017
                6365306
                30775633
                3279b641-8daf-4105-aa27-64038c240a09
                © 2018 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Nephrology Round

                Comments

                Comment on this article