14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of dose and duration of reduction in dietary sodium on blood pressure levels: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To examine the dose-response relation between reduction in dietary sodium and blood pressure change and to explore the impact of intervention duration.

          Design

          Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.

          Data sources

          Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley) and reference lists of relevant articles up to 21 January 2019.

          Inclusion criteria

          Randomised trials comparing different levels of sodium intake undertaken among adult populations with estimates of intake made using 24 hour urinary sodium excretion.

          Data extraction and analysis

          Two of three reviewers screened the records independently for eligibility. One reviewer extracted all data and the other two reviewed the data for accuracy. Reviewers performed random effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression.

          Results

          133 studies with 12 197 participants were included. The mean reductions (reduced sodium v usual sodium) of 24 hour urinary sodium, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 130 mmol (95% confidence interval 115 to 145, P<0.001), 4.26 mm Hg (3.62 to 4.89, P<0.001), and 2.07 mm Hg (1.67 to 2.48, P<0.001), respectively. Each 50 mmol reduction in 24 hour sodium excretion was associated with a 1.10 mm Hg (0.66 to 1.54; P<0.001) reduction in SBP and a 0.33 mm Hg (0.04 to 0.63; P=0.03) reduction in DBP. Reductions in blood pressure were observed in diverse population subsets examined, including hypertensive and non-hypertensive individuals. For the same reduction in 24 hour urinary sodium there was greater SBP reduction in older people, non-white populations, and those with higher baseline SBP levels. In trials of less than 15 days’ duration, each 50 mmol reduction in 24 hour urinary sodium excretion was associated with a 1.05 mm Hg (0.40 to 1.70; P=0.002) SBP fall, less than half the effect observed in studies of longer duration (2.13 mm Hg; 0.85 to 3.40; P=0.002). Otherwise, there was no association between trial duration and SBP reduction.

          Conclusions

          The magnitude of blood pressure lowering achieved with sodium reduction showed a dose-response relation and was greater for older populations, non-white populations, and those with higher blood pressure. Short term studies underestimate the effect of sodium reduction on blood pressure.

          Systematic review registration

          PROSPERO CRD42019140812.

          Related collections

          Most cited references150

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Urinary sodium excretion, blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and mortality: a community-level prospective epidemiological cohort study

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of low sodium diet versus high sodium diet on blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, catecholamines, cholesterol, and triglyceride

            In spite of more than 100 years of investigations the question of whether a reduced sodium intake improves health is still unsolved. To estimate the effects of low sodium intake versus high sodium intake on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), plasma or serum levels of renin, aldosterone, catecholamines, cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein (HDL), low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglycerides. The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials up to March 2016: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2016, Issue 3), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles. Studies randomising persons to low‐sodium and high‐sodium diets were included if they evaluated at least one of the above outcome parameters. Two review authors independently collected data, which were analysed with Review Manager 5.3. A total of 185 studies were included. The average sodium intake was reduced from 201 mmol/day (corresponding to high usual level) to 66 mmol/day (corresponding to the recommended level). The effect of sodium reduction on blood pressure (BP) was as follows: white people with normotension: SBP: mean difference (MD) ‐1.09 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI): ‐1.63 to ‐0.56; P = 0.0001); 89 studies, 8569 participants; DBP: + 0.03 mmHg (MD 95% CI: ‐0.37 to 0.43; P = 0.89); 90 studies, 8833 participants. High‐quality evidence. Black people with normotension: SBP: MD ‐4.02 mmHg (95% CI:‐7.37 to ‐0.68; P = 0.002); seven studies, 506 participants; DBP: MD ‐2.01 mmHg (95% CI:‐4.37 to 0.35; P = 0.09); seven studies, 506 participants. Moderate‐quality evidence. Asian people with normotension: SBP: MD ‐0.72 mmHg (95% CI: ‐3.86 to 2.41; P = 0.65); DBP: MD ‐1.63 mmHg (95% CI:‐3.35 to 0.08; P =0.06); three studies, 393 participants. Moderate‐quality evidence. White people with hypertension: SBP: MD ‐5.51 mmHg (95% CI: ‐6.45 to ‐4.57; P < 0.00001); 84 studies, 5925 participants; DBP: MD ‐2.88 mmHg (95% CI: ‐3.44 to ‐2.32; P < 0.00001); 85 studies, 6001 participants. High‐quality evidence. Black people with hypertension: SBP MD ‐6.64 mmHg (95% CI:‐9.00 to ‐4.27; P = 0.00001); eight studies, 619 participants; DBP ‐2.91 mmHg (95% CI:‐4.52, ‐1.30; P = 0.0004); eight studies, 619 participants. Moderate‐quality evidence. Asian people with hypertension: SBP: MD ‐7.75 mmHg (95% CI:‐11,44 to ‐4.07; P < 0.0001) nine studies, 501 participants; DBP: MD ‐2.68 mmHg (95% CI: ‐4.21 to ‐1.15; P = 0.0006). Moderate‐quality evidence. In plasma or serum, there was a significant increase in renin (P < 0.00001), aldosterone (P < 0.00001), noradrenaline (P < 0.00001), adrenaline (P < 0.03), cholesterol (P < 0.0005) and triglyceride (P < 0.0006) with low sodium intake as compared with high sodium intake. All effects were stable in 125 study populations with a sodium intake below 250 mmol/day and a sodium reduction intervention of at least one week. Sodium reduction from an average high usual sodium intake level (201 mmol/day) to an average level of 66 mmol/day, which is below the recommended upper level of 100 mmol/day (5.8 g salt), resulted in a decrease in SBP/DBP of 1/0 mmHg in white participants with normotension and a decrease in SBP/DBP of 5.5/2.9 mmHg in white participants with hypertension. A few studies showed that these effects in black and Asian populations were greater. The effects on hormones and lipids were similar in people with normotension and hypertension. Renin increased 1.60 ng/mL/hour (55%); aldosterone increased 97.81 pg/mL (127%); adrenalin increased 7.55 pg/mL (14%); noradrenalin increased 63.56 pg/mL: (27%); cholesterol increased 5.59 mg/dL (2.9%); triglyceride increased 7.04 mg/dL (6.3%). The effect of a low salt diet on blood pressure and some hormones and lipids in people with normal and elevated blood pressure Review question Studies in which participants were distributed by chance into groups with high and low salt intake were analysed to investigate the effect of reduced salt intake on blood pressure (BP) and potential side effects of sodium reduction on some hormones and lipids. Background As a reduction in salt intake decreases blood pressure (BP) in individuals with elevated BP, we are commonly advised to cut down on salt. However, the effect of salt reduction on BP in people with a normal BP has been questioned. Furthermore, several studies have shown that salt reduction activates the salt conserving hormonal system (renin and aldosterone), the stress hormones (adrenalin and noradrenalin) and increases fatty substances (cholesterol and triglyceride) in the blood. Search date The present evidence is current to April 2016. Study characteristics One hundred and eighty‐five intervention studies of 12,210 individuals lasting four to 1100 days were included, which evaluated at least one of the effect measures. Participants were healthy or had elevated blood pressure. Longitudinal studies have shown that the effect of reduced salt intake on BP is stable after at maximum seven days and population studies have shown that very few people eat more than 14.5 g salt per day. Therefore, we also perfomed subgroup sub‐analyses of 125 studies with a duration of at least seven days and a salt intake of maximum 14.5 g. Study funding sources Forty‐four studies did not mention support. One hundred and twenty‐two studies were supported by public foundations. Twelve studies were supported by the pharmaceutical industry and one study by an electronic company. Six studies were supported by food industry organisations. Key results The mean dietary sodium intake was reduced from 11.5 g per day to 3.8 g per day. The reduction in SBP/DBP in people with normotension was about 1/0 mmHg, and in people with hypertension about 5.5/2.9 mmHg. In contrast, the effect on hormones and lipids were similar in people with normotension and hypertension. Renin increased 1.60 ng/mL/hour (55%); aldosterone increased 97.81 pg/mL (127%); adrenalin increased 7.55 pg/mL (14%); noradrenalin increased 63.56 pg/mL (27%); cholesterol increased 5.59 mg/dL (2.9%); triglyceride increased 7.04 mg/dL (6.3%). Quality of evidence Only randomised controlled trials were included and the basic grade of evidence was therefore considered to be high, although the grade of evidence was downgraded in some of the smaller analyses. In general, the description of the randomisation procedure was insufficient, introducing a bias which could exaggerate the effects, but many of the studies were published in a period where it was not customary to report such descriptions. The majority of studies were open, but the outcomes of these did not differ from the outcomes of the double‐blind studies. Almost all individual studies of participants with normal blood pressure (BP) show no significant effect of sodium reduction on BP, whereas a large number of studies in people with hypertension did show significant effect of sodium reduction on BP. Thus, there was a high grade of consistency between the outcomes of the individual studies and the outcomes of the meta‐analyses. Sensitivity analyses of studies lasting at least one week (the time of maximal efficacy) confirmed the primary analyses. Finally, the impact of commercial interests on the outcomes was negligible.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of weight loss and sodium reduction intervention on blood pressure and hypertension incidence in overweight people with high-normal blood pressure. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention, phase II. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group.

              JA Cutler (1997)
              To provide a firmer basis for preventing high blood pressure (BP), we tested interventions to promote weight loss, dietary sodium reduction, and their combination for lowering diastolic BP, systolic BP, and the incidence of hypertension during a 3- to 4-year period. We conducted a randomized, 2 x 2 factorial, clinical trial, with BP levels measured by blinded observers. Nine academic medical centers recruited 2382 men and women (age range, 30-54 years) not taking antihypertensive drugs, with a diastolic BP of 83 to 89 mm Hg, a systolic BP lower than 140 mm Hg, and a body mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) representing 110% to 165% of desirable body weight. Counseling aimed at helping participants achieve their desirable weight or a 4.5-kg or more weight reduction (in the weight loss and combined groups) and/or sodium intake of 80 mmol/d (in the sodium reduction and combined groups) was provided. From baseline, participants' weight decreased by 4.3 to 4.5 kg at 6 months and by approximately 2 kg at 36 months in the weight loss and combined groups compared with weight changes in the usual care group (all groups, P or = 140 mm Hg systolic or > or = 90 mm Hg diastolic or the use of antihypertensive drugs) was significantly less in each active intervention group than the usual care group (average relative risks, 0.78-0.82). In overweight adults with high-normal BP, weight loss and reduction in sodium intake, individually and in combination, were effective in lowering systolic and diastolic BP, especially in the short-term (6 months). Although the effects on average BP declined over time, reductions in hypertension incidence were achieved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: doctoral candidate and data analyst
                Role: research fellow
                Role: honorary fellow and consultant stroke neurologist
                Role: executive director and professor of clinical epidemiology
                Role: professor of medical statistics and professor of statistics and epidemiology
                Role: professor emeritus
                Role: senior biostatistician
                Role: professor of epidemiology
                Role: assistant professor
                Role: professor
                Role: professor of cardiovascular medicine
                Role: professor of global health research
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ-UK
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2020
                24 February 2020
                : 368
                : m315
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [2 ]The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [3 ]National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, Osaka, Japan
                [4 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [5 ]The George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [6 ]Departments of Medicine and Community Health Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
                [7 ]Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
                [8 ]The University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
                [9 ]Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: F J He f.he@ 123456qmul.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2807-4119
                Article
                hual051597
                10.1136/bmj.m315
                7190039
                32094151
                30800696-9150-4df0-bd01-6b14a667de7e
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 08 January 2020
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article