3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Second‐ and third‐year medical students’ clinical encounters in the emergency department

      brief-report
      , MD 1 , , , MS 2 , , MD, Med 2
      AEM Education and Training
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      curriculum, emergency medicine, students, medical

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Experiential learning theory suggests that direct clinical experiences facilitate learning. Previous literature has focused primarily on the experiences of fourth‐year medical students. As more students gain early clinical exposure, it is important to understand the types of patients seen by junior students.

          Objectives

          This study aims to categorize the clinical experiences of early (M2 and M3) students in the emergency department (ED).

          Methods

          A retrospective review of the electronic health record of patients seen by M2s and M3s on a 2‐week emergency medicine rotation at a single urban academic ED in the Midwest was performed. Data elements extracted included total number of patients seen, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), disposition, and chief complaint. Students were not mandated to see any particular patients.

          Results

          Medical students (248) saw 2994 total patients from 2018 to 2022. The median number of patients seen by each student was 12.0 (range 1–32). Pediatric patients made up 6.5% ( n = 194) of total patients. Encounters were primarily ESI 2 or 3, which accounted for 89.4% of all patients ( n = 2676). The most encountered complaints were abdominal pain, chest pain, and dyspnea, making up 15.6% ( n = 467), 8.7% ( n = 260), and 5.5% ( n = 165), respectively, of total cases. Obstetrics/gynecology, hematologic, and environmental disorders were the least frequently encountered domains. No students saw all Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM)–recommended complaints.

          Conclusions

          There is significant variability in the ED encounters of M2s and M3s, with wide ranges of patient volume and presentations. This study provides some evidence that early students may not be meeting CDEM recommendations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          What training is needed in the fourth year of medical school? Views of residency program directors.

          To identify common struggles of interns, determine residency program directors' (PDs') views of the competencies to be gained in the fourth year of medical school, and apply this information to formulate goals of curricular reform and student advising. In 2007, semistructured interviews were conducted with 30 PDs in the 10 most common specialty choices of students at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine to assess the PDs' priorities for knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be acquired in the fourth year. Interviews were coded to identify major themes. Common struggles of interns were lack of self-reflection and improvement, poor organizational skills, underdeveloped professionalism, and lack of medical knowledge. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies of patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, interpersonal and communication skills, and professionalism were deemed fundamental to fourth-year students' development. Rotations recommended across specialties were a subinternship in a student's future field and in internal medicine (IM), rotations in an IM subspecialty, critical care, and emergency and ambulatory medicine. PDs encouraged minimizing additional time spent in the student's future field. Suggested coursework included an intensively coached transitional subinternship and courses to improve students' medical knowledge. PDs deemed the fourth year to have a critical role in the curriculum. There was consensus about expected fourth-year competencies and the common clinical experiences that best prepare students for residency training. These findings support using the fourth year to transition students to graduate medical training and highlight areas for curricular innovation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Does the Concept of the “Flipped Classroom” Extend to the Emergency Medicine Clinical Clerkship?

            Introduction Linking educational objectives and clinical learning during clerkships can be difficult. Clinical shifts during emergency medicine (EM) clerkships provide a wide variety of experiences, some of which may not be relevant to recommended educational objectives. Students can be directed to standardize their clinical experiences, and this improves performance on examinations. We hypothesized that applying a “flipped classroom” model to the clinical clerkship would improve performance on multiple-choice testing when compared to standard learning. Methods Students at two institutions were randomized to complete two of four selected EM clerkship topics in a “flipped fashion,” and two others in a standard fashion. For flipped topics, students were directed to complete chief complaint-based asynchronous modules prior to a shift, during which they were directed to focus on the chief complaint. For the other two topics, modules were to be performed at the students’ discretion, and shifts would not have a theme. At the end of the four-week clerkship, a 40-question multiple-choice examination was administered with 10 questions per topic. We compared performance on flipped topics with those performed in standard fashion. Students were surveyed on perceived effectiveness, ability to follow the protocol, and willingness of preceptors to allow a chief-complaint focus. Results Sixty-nine students participated; examination scores for 56 were available for analysis. For the primary outcome, no difference was seen between the flipped method and standard (p=0.494.) A mixed model approach showed no effect of flipped status, protocol adherence, or site of rotation on the primary outcome of exam scores. Students rated the concept of the flipped clerkship highly (3.48/5). Almost one third (31.1%) of students stated that they were unable to adhere to the protocol. Conclusion Preparation for a clinical shift with pre-assigned, web-based learning modules followed by an attempt at chief-complaint-focused learning during a shift did not result in improvements in performance on a multiple-choice assessment of knowledge; however, one third of participants did not adhere strictly to the protocol. Future investigations should ensure performance of pre-assigned learning as well as clinical experiences, and consider alternate measures of knowledge.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Emergency Medicine in the Medical School Curriculum

              Emergency medicine (EM) is a dynamic specialty that continues to define itself as a fertile training ground for medical students. Throughout the years, a number of U.S. medical schools have incorporated topics germane to EM training (basic cardiac life support, principles of wound care, splinting, basic procedural skills training, etc.) into the medical school curriculum. By virtue of their broad-based training and the unique patient care environment that they practice in, EM specialists can serve a multitude of educational roles in the medical school. Whether serving as a problem-based learning facilitator, collaborating with basic scientists, or teaching medical history-taking and physical examination skills in the emergency department (ED), EM faculty can effectively teach future physicians in training. Although opportunities for teaching will vary by institution, often all it takes to get involved is asking. Teaching can take place in the ED, classroom, or simulation center, both in the preclinical and in the clinical curriculum. EM faculty may be well suited to help teach procedural skills to students as they enter their clinical clerkships. A formal rotation in EM can also assist the medical school in achieving their institutional objectives or in identifying ways to satisfy the Liaison Committee on Medical Education's objectives. Patients presenting to the ED span the entire spectrum: young and old, sick and not sick. It is this variety of cases that makes the ED a truly valuable setting for educating students.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ines.hoxha96@gmail.com
                Journal
                AEM Educ Train
                AEM Educ Train
                10.1002/(ISSN)2472-5390
                AET2
                AEM Education and Training
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2472-5390
                21 February 2024
                February 2024
                01 February 2024
                : 8
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/aet2.v8.1 )
                : e10937
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ines Hoxha, University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53726, USA.

                Email: ines.hoxha96@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8792-3858
                Article
                AET210937 AEMET-23-114.R1
                10.1002/aet2.10937
                10950016
                38504802
                28b151e1-6ae7-44cd-ad4a-1a224d9a795f
                © 2024 The Authors. AEM Education and Training published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 08 October 2023
                : 28 May 2023
                : 23 November 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Pages: 5, Words: 2885
                Categories
                Brief Contribution
                Brief Contribution
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.9 mode:remove_FC converted:19.03.2024

                curriculum,emergency medicine,students, medical
                curriculum, emergency medicine, students, medical

                Comments

                Comment on this article