38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of fluoride on friction between bracket and wire

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Friction is usually encountered during sliding technique for orthodontic space closure. This study aims to investigate the effect of fluoride on frictional resistance between stainless steel orthodontic brackets and steel and NiTi arch wires.

          Materials and Methods:

          A total of 144 standard 022 stainless steel brackets were used in this experimental study. 0.016 and 0.019 × 0.025 inch steel and NiTi arch wires were tested. The frictional resistance between wires and brackets immersed in the following three solutions were measured: Sultan fluoride gel containing 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride at pH 3.5 for 4 minutes, aquafresh mouth wash containing 0.05% sodium fluoride at pH of 5.1 for 1 minute twice a day for 8 weeks and physiologic serum (pH=7) as the control group. Static and dynamic frictional forces were measured using Testometric machine. Surface topography of wires and brackets was qualitatively assessed using electron microscopy. Three-way and two-way variance analysis and complementary Tuckey analysis were applied to compare the groups for any significant differences ( P<0.05).

          Results:

          The average static and dynamic frictional forces for all bracket-wire combinations immersed in Sultan fluoride gel were higher than those immersed in NAF and control groups ( P<0.001).The forces measured for rectangular wires were higher than round wires ( P<0.001). Frictional resistance of 0.016 inch NiTi wire was more than that of the steel one but the difference between steel and NiTi 0.019 × 0.25 arch wires was not significant.

          Conclusion:

          Friction between steel brackets and nickel titanium and steel wires is affected by prophylactic agents containing high doses of fluoride and acidity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire.

          Practitioners are aware of the presence of friction in those orthodontic appliances where relative motion between bracket system and arch wire occurs in ordinary deactivation processes. Numerous comments on friction have appeared in the published dental/orthodontic literature, but little controlled research into the problem has been reported. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate and compare frictional forces generated in an experimental stimulation of the canine-retraction procedure on a continuous arch wire. Six independent variables were chosen for study: arch wire size and shape, bracket width and style, second-order angulation between bracket and passive arch wire, arch wire material, ligature force and type of ligation, and interbracket distances. Frictional resistance was found to be nonlinearly dependent upon bracket/arch wire angulation. With small and generally nonbinding angulations, bracket width and ligature force were the dominant influences on level of friction. As angulations were increased, producing binding between wire and bracket, this variable itself became the controlling parameter. Wire shape and arch wire stiffness in bending, a function of three of the variables studied, apparently exerted substantial influence on frictional-force magnitude at relatively high angulations. The reduced data, together with structural computations, were employed to deduce a minimum frictional-resistance combination of edgewise appliance components.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.

            An in vitro study of simulated canine retraction was undertaken to evaluate the difference in frictional resistance between stainless steel arch wires and steel and ceramic brackets with elastomeric, steel, and self-ligation. Each bracket slot was 0.018 x 0.025 inch. The arch wires used were 0.014-inch, 0.016-inch, 0.018-inch, 0.016 x 0.016-inch, and 0.016 x 0.22-inch stainless steel. A testing apparatus was designed to attempt to simulate the clinical situation in which teeth tip slightly while they slide along the arch wire. Under these testing conditions, the self-ligating steel bracket did not demonstrate less friction than the elastic or steel-ligated stainless steel brackets. For most wire sizes, elastomer-ligated ceramic brackets demonstrated the greatest friction when compared with other bracket/ligation technique combinations. The clinical significance of this study becomes apparent when stainless steel brackets are used on the posterior teeth and ceramic brackets are used on the anterior teeth. If sliding mechanics are used, the anterior teeth may be more resistant to movement than the posterior teeth because of the greater friction of the ceramic brackets. This could result in more posterior anchorage loss than would be expected if only one type of bracket were used.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dent Res J (Isfahan)
                Dent Res J (Isfahan)
                DRJ
                Dental Research Journal
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                1735-3327
                2008-0255
                December 2011
                : 8
                : Suppl1
                : S37-S42
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Ali Farahi, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar Jarib St, Isfahan, Iran. E-mail: dr.alifarahi@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                DRJ-8-37
                3556283
                23372594
                236410ce-0b48-4336-a281-fe57984ffa0b
                Copyright: © Dental Research Journal

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : July 2011
                : September 2011
                Categories
                Original Article

                Dentistry
                fluoride,friction,sliding mechanics,orthodontic bracket
                Dentistry
                fluoride, friction, sliding mechanics, orthodontic bracket

                Comments

                Comment on this article