0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Cancer Outcomes in DCIS Patients Without Locoregional Treatment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The vast majority of women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergo treatment. Therefore, the risks of invasive progression and competing death in the absence of locoregional therapy are uncertain.

          Methods

          We performed survival analyses of patient-level data from DCIS patients who did not receive definitive surgery or radiation therapy as recorded in the US National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (1992–2014). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the net risk of subsequent ipsilateral invasive cancer. The cumulative incidences of ipsilateral invasive cancer, contralateral breast cancer, and death were estimated using competing risk methods.

          Results

          A total of 1286 DCIS patients who did not undergo locoregional therapy were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 60 years (inter-quartile range = 51–74 years), with median follow-up of 5.5 years (inter-quartile range = 2.3–10.6 years). Among patients with tumor grade I/II (n = 547), the 10-year net risk of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer was 12.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.6% to 17.1%) compared with 17.6% (95% CI = 12.1% to 25.2%) among patients with tumor grade III (n = 244) and 10.1% (95% CI = 7.4% to 13.8%) among patients with unknown grade (n = 495). Among all patients, the 10-year cumulative incidences of ipsilateral invasive cancer, contralateral breast cancer, and all-cause mortality were 10.5% (95% CI = 8.5% to 12.4%), 3.9% (95% CI = 2.6% to 5.2%), and 24.1% (95% CI = 21.2% to 26.9%), respectively.

          Conclusion

          Despite limited data, our findings suggest that DCIS patients without locoregional treatment have a limited risk of invasive progression. Although the cohort is not representative of the general population of patients diagnosed with DCIS, the findings suggest that there may be overtreatment, especially among older patients and patients with elevated comorbidities.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Natl Cancer Inst
          J. Natl. Cancer Inst
          jnci
          JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
          Oxford University Press
          0027-8874
          1460-2105
          September 2019
          13 February 2019
          13 February 2020
          : 111
          : 9
          : 952-960
          Author notes

          See the Notes section for the full list of authors’ affiliations.

          Correspondence to: Marc D. Ryser, PhD, Department of Population Health Sciences and Department of Mathematics, Duke University Medical Center, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC 27701 (e-mail: marc.ryser@ 123456duke.edu ).
          Article
          PMC6748726 PMC6748726 6748726 djy220
          10.1093/jnci/djy220
          6748726
          30759222
          14e53703-b117-4101-b7a3-d08f09e378cf
          © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

          History
          : 02 May 2018
          : 26 October 2018
          : 29 November 2018
          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Funding
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
          Award ID: K99 CA207872
          Award ID: R01 CA185138-01
          Award ID: R01CA165301
          Award ID: 5P30CA014236
          Award ID: U01CA199218
          Award ID: R01CA165301
          Award ID: R50 CA221836
          Funded by: National Science Foundation 10.13039/100000001
          Award ID: DMS-1614838
          Funded by: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute 10.13039/100006093
          Award ID: 1505–30497
          Funded by: Department of Defense 10.13039/100000005
          Award ID: BC132057
          Funded by: Breast Cancer Research Fund
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
          Award ID: U01 CA152958
          Award ID: U01 CA157224
          Funded by: Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network Breast
          Funded by: Prostate Cancer Working Groups
          Categories
          Articles

          Comments

          Comment on this article