4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Digital Diagnostic Techniques

      Submit here before November 30, 2024

      About Pathobiology: 3.5 Impact Factor I 8.5 CiteScore I 1.088 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      Call for Papers: Novel Methods in Vascular and Lymphatic Physiology

      Submit here before June 30, 2025

      About Journal of Vascular Research: 1.8 Impact Factor I 3.4 CiteScore I 0.486 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Long-Term Change in Flow Rates in Patients with Coronary Slow Flow

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Coronary slow flow (CSF) is a condition characterized by impaired blood flow rates in the coronary arteries. It can result in severe cardiovascular outcomes. There is no sufficient evidence regarding the certain etiology and reversibility of slow flow patterns and changes in frame counts with long-term management. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 48 patients with chronic coronary syndrome and CSF who underwent a second angiography. A corrected coronary frame rate (CFR) >27 was defined as CSF. We created 3 groups according to the change in CSF status as the improved, not changed, and worsened groups. We compared the CFR and CSF status of the patients between the first and second angiographies within a median of 2.6 years. Results: We determined a nonsignificant change in cCFR in left anterior descending (LAD) artery (34.4 [18.9] vs. 31.59 [10.3], p = 0.35), circumflex (Cx) artery (42.84 [12.56] vs. 40.66 [13.2], p = 0.35), and right coronary artery (RCA) (57.80 [30.13] vs. 50.32 [19.5], p = 0.11). In the comparison of CSF status of LAD (75% vs. 63%, p = 0.27), Cx (96% vs. 83%, p = 0.09), RCA (94% vs. 94%, p = 1.0) between first and second angiographies, there was no significant change. In the comparison of the 3 groups according to the improvement of CSF status, there was no significant difference in demographic features, change in laboratory parameters, and time between the groups. Conclusion: There was no significant change in the median CFR and CSF status in the overall group between the two angiographies after 3 years.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          CRD
          Cardiology
          10.1159/issn.0008-6312
          Cardiology
          Cardiology
          S. Karger AG
          0008-6312
          1421-9751
          2023
          December 2023
          26 August 2023
          : 148
          : 6
          : 500-505
          Affiliations
          Cardiology Department, Siyami Ersek Cardiothoracic Surgery Center, Istanbul, Turkey
          Article
          533802 Cardiology 2023;148:500–505
          10.1159/000533802
          37634497
          13f79538-4d8e-4b55-8466-3e4595792d38
          © 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

          History
          : 13 June 2023
          : 22 August 2023
          Page count
          Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 6
          Funding
          There has been no funding received by the authors.
          Categories
          Cardiovascular Imaging: Research Article

          Medicine
          Chronic coronary syndrome,Frame count,Frame rates,Coronary slow flow
          Medicine
          Chronic coronary syndrome, Frame count, Frame rates, Coronary slow flow

          Comments

          Comment on this article