3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mechanisms to enhance racial equity in health care: Developing a model to facilitate translation of the ACCURE intervention

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          As medical and public health professional organizations call on researchers and policy makers to address structural racism in health care, guidance on evidence-based interventions to enhance health care equity is needed. The most promising organizational change interventions to reduce racial health disparities use multilevel approaches and are tailored to specific settings. This study examines the Accountability for Cancer Care through Undoing Racism and Equity (ACCURE) intervention, which changed systems of care at two U.S. cancer centers and eliminated the Black-White racial disparity in treatment completion among patients with early-stage breast and lung cancer.

          Purpose:

          We aimed to document key characteristics of ACCURE to facilitate translation of the intervention in other care settings.

          Methods:

          We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants who were involved in the design and implementation of ACCURE and analyzed their responses to identify the intervention’s mechanisms of change and key components.

          Results:

          Study participants (n = 18) described transparency and accountability as mechanisms of change that were operationalized through ACCURE’s key components. Intervention components were designed to enhance either institutional transparency (e.g., a data system that facilitated real-time reporting of quality metrics disaggregated by patient race) or accountability of the care system to community values and patient needs for minimally biased, tailored communication and support (e.g., nurse navigators with training in antiracism and proactive care protocols).

          Conclusions:

          The antiracism principles transparency and accountability may be effective change mechanisms in equity-focused health services interventions. The model presented in this study can guide future research aiming to adapt ACCURE and evaluate the intervention’s implementation and effectiveness in new settings and patient populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

          Background The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations. Discussion The article discusses when it is appropriate to adopt the Framework Method and explains the procedure for using it in multi-disciplinary health research teams, or those that involve clinicians, patients and lay people. The stages of the method are illustrated using examples from a published study. Summary Used effectively, with the leadership of an experienced qualitative researcher, the Framework Method is a systematic and flexible approach to analysing qualitative data and is appropriate for use in research teams even where not all members have previous experience of conducting qualitative research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions

            The Lancet, 389(10077), 1453-1463
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs

              During the past 20 years there has been a dramatic increase in societal interest in preventing disability and death in the United States by changing individual behaviors linked to the risk of contracting chronic diseases. This renewed interest in health promotion and disease prevention has not been without its critics. Some critics have accused proponents of life-style interventions of promoting a victim-blaming ideology by neglecting the importance of social influences on health and disease. This article proposes an ecological model for health promotion which focuses attention on both individual and social environmental factors as targets for health promotion interventions. It addresses the importance of interventions directed at changing interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy, factors which support and maintain unhealthy behaviors. The model assumes that appropriate changes in the social environment will produce changes in individuals, and that the support of individuals in the population is essential for implementing environmental changes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9918300877606676
                51148
                SSM Qual Res Health
                SSM Qual Res Health
                SSM. Qualitative research in health
                2667-3215
                13 July 2023
                June 2023
                2 December 2022
                21 July 2023
                : 3
                : 100204
                Affiliations
                [a ]US Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue (152M), Jamaica Plain Campus, Building 9, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
                [b ]Greensboro Health Disparities Collaborative, 301 S. Elm Street, Suite 414, Greensboro, NC, 27401, USA
                [c ]Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 300 Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
                [d ]Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
                [e ]Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
                [f ]Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
                [g ]Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, 1834 Wake Forest Rd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27109, USA
                [h ]Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina, 1408 Walker Ave # 437, Greensboro, NC, 27412, USA
                [i ]Department of Public Health Studies, Elon University, 100 Campus Drive, Elon, NC, 27244, USA
                [j ]Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 450 West Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
                [k ]Flatiron Health, 233 Spring St., New York, NY, 10013, USA
                [l ]Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, 1700 MLK Jr Blvd Ste 7426, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue (152M), Jamaica Plain Campus, Building 9, Boston, MA, 02130, USA. Ida.Griesemer@ 123456va.gov (I. Griesemer).
                Article
                NIHMS1913647
                10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100204
                10361418
                37483653
                13ed00f8-12ca-4d74-a4d5-b697450f4c7e

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                cancer care,quality improvement,intervention,planned adaptation,community-based participatory research,antiracism

                Comments

                Comment on this article