6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fit of Implant-Supported 3D Printing Resin Prosthetics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of 3D printing parameters on fit and internal gap of 3D printed resin dental prosthesis. The dental model was simulated and fabricated for three-unit prostheses with two implants. One hundred prostheses were 3D printed with two-layer thicknesses for five build orientations using a resin (NextDent C&B; 3D systems, Soesterberg, The Netherlands) and ten prostheses were manufactured with a milling resin as control. The prostheses were seated and scanned with micro-CT (computerized tomography). Internal gap volume (IGV) was calculated from 3D reconstructed micro-CT data. IGV, marginal fit, and lengths of internal gaps were measured, and the values were analyzed statistically. For the 3D printed prostheses, IGV was smaller at 45°, 60°, and 90° compared to other build orientations. The marginal fit evaluated by absolute marginal discrepancy was smaller than other build orientations at 45° and 60°. IGV was smaller at 50 µm layer thickness than at 100 µm layer thickness, but the marginal fit was smaller at 100 µm layer thickness than at 50 µm layer thickness. The 3D printed prosthesis had smaller internal gap than the milled prosthesis. The marginal fit of the 3D printed resin prosthesis was clinically acceptable, and build orientation of 45° and 60° would be recommended when considering fit and internal gap.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Considerations in measurement of marginal fit.

          The terminology describing "fit" and the techniques used for measuring fit vary considerably in the literature. Although fit can be most easily defined in terms of "misfit," there are many different locations between a tooth and a restoration where the measurements can be made. In this work, the measurements of misfit at different locations are geometrically related to each other and defined as internal gap, marginal gap, vertical marginal discrepancy, horizontal marginal discrepancy, overextended margin, underextended margin, absolute marginal discrepancy, and seating discrepancy. The significance and difference in magnitude of different locations are presented. The best alternative is perhaps the absolute marginal discrepancy, which would always be the largest measurement of error at the margin and would reflect the total misfit at that point.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials.

              To optimize the 3D printing of a dental material for provisional crown and bridge restorations using a low-cost stereolithography 3D printer; and compare its mechanical properties against conventionally cured provisional dental materials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Materials (Basel)
                Materials (Basel)
                materials
                Materials
                MDPI
                1996-1944
                09 August 2019
                August 2019
                : 12
                : 16
                : 2533
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: ksy0617@ 123456snu.ac.kr ; Tel.: +82-2-2072-3860
                Article
                materials-12-02533
                10.3390/ma12162533
                6720497
                31395801
                0e4b7d87-a6d1-42ec-9ff4-75d6ca1abf60
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 July 2019
                : 06 August 2019
                Categories
                Article

                implant,prosthesis,3d printing,fit,bioengineering
                implant, prosthesis, 3d printing, fit, bioengineering

                Comments

                Comment on this article