13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ambidexterity in Social Capital, Dynamic Capability, and SMEs’ Performance: Quadratic Effect of Dynamic Capability and Moderating Role of Market Orientation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The importance of organizational ambidexterity was stressed in different fields of management. This study was using a distinct method to measure the differences in the degree of ambidexterity to bridge the gap with the previous studies and to provide more insights in the successful management of exploitation and exploration. This study surveyed Taiwanese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to test the hypotheses. We issued 1000 questionnaires in total and received 234 valid ones. Results indicate exploitative and explorative capabilities exerting non-linear effect on performance. Likewise, ambidexterity and its interaction with market orientation have positive influence on firm performance. This study used structural equation modeling to analyze data, as this approach is known to be particularly advantageous for the exploratory nature of this study. We also used hierarchical regression analysis to test interaction and moderating effects. The study contributes to the literature in two ways. First, we offer a clearer understanding of the complete concept of social capital, including inter-firm and intra-firm social capital, and how contributes to improving and extending existing exploitative capabilities. Second, this study outlines how market orientation can have different effects on an ambidextrous strategy that is adopted to improve Taiwanese SMEs performance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

          Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.

              Despite the concern that has been expressed about potential method biases, and the pervasiveness of research settings with the potential to produce them, there is disagreement about whether they really are a problem for researchers in the behavioral sciences. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to explore the current state of knowledge about method biases. First, we explore the meaning of the terms "method" and "method bias" and then we examine whether method biases influence all measures equally. Next, we review the evidence of the effects that method biases have on individual measures and on the covariation between different constructs. Following this, we evaluate the procedural and statistical remedies that have been used to control method biases and provide recommendations for minimizing method bias.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                05 February 2021
                2020
                : 11
                : 584969
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Research Center of Open Economics and Trade, Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade , Fuzhou, China
                [2] 2School of Economics & Management, Foshan University , Foshan, China
                [3] 3Department of International Business, Fuzhou Melbourne Polytechnic , Fuzhou, China
                [4] 4Department of International Business, Providence University , Taichung, Taiwan
                [5] 5Department of Business Administration, National Chung Hsing University , Taichung, Taiwan
                [6] 6School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology , Xi’an, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Nicola Mucci, University of Florence, Italy

                Reviewed by: Patrocinio Zaragoza-Saez, University of Alicante, Spain; Riccardo Rialti, University of Florence, Italy

                *Correspondence: Lijin Shao, 49364408@ 123456qq.com
                Muhammad Khalid Anser, mkhalidrao@ 123456xauat.edu.cn

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584969
                7892958
                33613352
                07a9fafe-0de0-4d83-805c-6ffc9b6d0856
                Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Peng, Shao, Yen, Lin and Anser.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 July 2020
                : 22 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 91, Pages: 15, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                internal social capital,external social capital,ambidexterity,dynamic capability,market orientation

                Comments

                Comment on this article