1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Comparing quantitative methods on the evaluation of scientific value in geosites: analysis from the Itatiaia National Park, Brazil

      , ,
      Geomorphology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: a Review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Geomorphosites: Concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A method for assessing "scientific" and "additional values" of geomorphosites

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Geomorphology
                Geomorphology
                Elsevier BV
                0169555X
                January 2022
                January 2022
                : 396
                : 107988
                Article
                10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107988
                074f3db0-2a9f-47a7-ba50-1d4896fb3c97
                © 2022

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article