1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for GEDI Footprint Aboveground Biomass Density

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar is a multibeam laser altimeter on the International Space Station (ISS). GEDI is the first spaceborne instrument designed to measure vegetation height and to quantify aboveground carbon stocks in temperate and tropical forests and woodlands. This document describes the algorithm theoretical basis underpinning the development of the GEDI Level‐4A (GEDI04_A) footprint aboveground biomass density (AGBD) data product. The GEDI04_A data product contains estimates of AGBD for individual GEDI footprints and associated prediction intervals. The algorithm uses GEDI02_A relative height metrics and 13 linear models to predict AGBD in 32 combinations of plant functional type and world region within the observation limits of the ISS. GEDI04_A models for the release 1 and release 2 data products were developed using 8,587 quality‐filtered simulated GEDI waveforms associated with field estimates of AGBD in 21 countries. Although this is the most geographically comprehensive data available for the development of AGBD models using lidar remote sensing, important regions are underrepresented, including the forests of continental Asia, deciduous broadleaf forests and savannas of the dry tropics, and evergreen broadleaf forests north of Australia. We describe the scientific and statistical assumptions required to develop globally representative estimates of AGBD using GEDI lidar, including generalization beyond training data, and exclusion of GEDI02_A observations that do not meet requirements of the GEDI04_A algorithm. The footprint‐level predictions generated by this process provide globally comprehensive estimates of AGBD. These footprint‐level predictions are a prerequisite for the GEDI04_B gridded AGBD data product.

          Plain Language Summary

          The amount of carbon stored in aboveground vegetation is uncertain. This uncertainty limits our ability to calculate fluxes of carbon between the land surface and the atmosphere, and prevents rigorous carbon offset crediting in forests. Much of this uncertainty is attributed to inconsistent measurement techniques and the use of Earth‐observation methods that were not designed to quantify carbon density. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) can largely overcome these challenges by producing measurements of vegetation height using a lidar sensor on the International Space Station. This document describes methods developed by the GEDI Science Team to convert spaceborne measurements of vegetation height into estimates of aboveground biomass density. The algorithms depend on the geographic world region and the type of vegetation that is present at a sampled location. For example, evergreen broadleaf forests of the humid tropics in South America and deciduous broadleaf forests of Europe use different algorithms. Statistical models were developed using comprehensive field measurements and simulated GEDI data. This document describes the importance of filtering GEDI data to reduce the impact of measurement artifacts on aboveground biomass predictions. Quality flags and ancillary data contained in the GEDI04_A data product ensure that the best predictions can be used.

          Key Points

          • Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) aboveground biomass density is from models trained on a comprehensive database of field measurements and simulated GEDI waveforms

          • On‐orbit prediction requires stratification by plant functional type and world region

          • Quality flags and metrics distinguish GEDI measurements that are representative of the conditions under which models were developed

          Related collections

          Most cited references81

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees.

            Terrestrial carbon stock mapping is important for the successful implementation of climate change mitigation policies. Its accuracy depends on the availability of reliable allometric models to infer oven-dry aboveground biomass of trees from census data. The degree of uncertainty associated with previously published pantropical aboveground biomass allometries is large. We analyzed a global database of directly harvested trees at 58 sites, spanning a wide range of climatic conditions and vegetation types (4004 trees ≥ 5 cm trunk diameter). When trunk diameter, total tree height, and wood specific gravity were included in the aboveground biomass model as covariates, a single model was found to hold across tropical vegetation types, with no detectable effect of region or environmental factors. The mean percent bias and variance of this model was only slightly higher than that of locally fitted models. Wood specific gravity was an important predictor of aboveground biomass, especially when including a much broader range of vegetation types than previous studies. The generic tree diameter-height relationship depended linearly on a bioclimatic stress variable E, which compounds indices of temperature variability, precipitation variability, and drought intensity. For cases in which total tree height is unavailable for aboveground biomass estimation, a pantropical model incorporating wood density, trunk diameter, and the variable E outperformed previously published models without height. However, to minimize bias, the development of locally derived diameter-height relationships is advised whenever possible. Both new allometric models should contribute to improve the accuracy of biomass assessment protocols in tropical vegetation types, and to advancing our understanding of architectural and evolutionary constraints on woody plant development. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Earth and Space Science
                Earth and Space Science
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                2333-5084
                2333-5084
                April 2023
                April 20 2023
                April 2023
                : 10
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute at Brown for Environment and Society Brown University Providence RI USA
                [2 ] Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Brown University Providence RI USA
                [3 ] Department of Geographical Sciences University of Maryland College Park College Park MD USA
                Article
                10.1029/2022EA002516
                0298a594-3a27-4e56-b803-aad7fa7a2c37
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article