26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Integrating Land Use, Ecosystem Service, and Human Well-Being: A Systematic Review

      , , , , ,
      Sustainability
      MDPI AG
      Overview Bookmark

            Abstract

            Global change, population growth, and urbanization have been exerting a severe influence on the environment, including the social system and ecosystem. To find solutions based on nature, clarifying the complicated mechanisms and feedback among land use/land cover changes, ecosystem services, and human well-being, is increasingly crucial. However, the in-depth linkages among these three elements have not been clearly and systematically illustrated, present research paths have not been summarized well, and the future research trends on this topic have not been reasonably discussed. In this sense, the purpose of this paper is to provide an insight into how land use/land cover changes, ecosystem services, and human well-being are linked, as well as their relationships, interacting ways, applications in solving ecological and socioeconomic problems, and to reveal their future research trends. Here, we use a systematic literature review of the peer-reviewed literature to conclude the state of the art and the progress, emphasize the hotspot, and reveal the future trend of the nexus among the three aspects. Results show that (1) ecosystem services are generally altered by the changes in land use type, spatial pattern, and intensity; (2) the nexus among land use change, ecosystem services, and human well-being is usually used for supporting poverty alleviation, ecosystem health, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development; (3) future research on land use/land cover changes, ecosystem services, and human well-being should mainly focus on strengthening multiscale correlation, driving force analysis, the correlation among different group characteristics, land use types and ecosystem service preferences, and the impact of climate change on ecosystem services and human well-being. This study provides an enhanced understanding of the nexus among the three aspects and a reference for future studies to mitigate the relevant problems.

            References

            1. Yue Huanbi, He Chunyang, Huang Qingxu, Yin Dan, Bryan Brett A.. Stronger policy required to substantially reduce deaths from PM2.5 pollution in China. Nature Communications. Vol. 11(1)2020. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            2. He Chunyang, Liu Zhifeng, Wu Jianguo, Pan Xinhao, Fang Zihang, Li Jingwei, Bryan Brett A.. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nature Communications. Vol. 12(1)2021. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            3. Cao Yanni, Kong Lingqiao, Zhang Lufeng, Ouyang Zhiyun. The balance between economic development and ecosystem service value in the process of land urbanization: A case study of China’s land urbanization from 2000 to 2015. Land Use Policy. Vol. 108:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            4. Bateman Ian J., Mace Georgina M., Fezzi Carlo, Atkinson Giles, Turner Kerry. Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics. Vol. 48(2):177–218. 2011. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            5. Carpenter Stephen R., DeFries Ruth, Dietz Thomas, Mooney Harold A., Polasky Stephen, Reid Walter V., Scholes Robert J.. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Research Needs. Science. Vol. 314(5797):257–258. 2006. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). [Cross Ref]

            6. Bongaarts John. IPBES, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Population and Development Review. Vol. 45(3):680–681. 2019. Wiley. [Cross Ref]

            7. Lambin E.F, Rounsevell M.D.A, Geist H.J. Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. Vol. 82(1-3):321–331. 2000. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            8. Cao Qian, Liu Yupeng, Georgescu Matei, Wu Jianguo. Impacts of landscape changes on local and regional climate: a systematic review. Landscape Ecology. Vol. 35(6):1269–1290. 2020. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            9. Wang Qiang, Xu Youpeng, Wang Yuefeng, Zhang Yuqing, Xiang Jie, Xu Yu, Wang Jie. Individual and combined impacts of future land-use and climate conditions on extreme hydrological events in a representative basin of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmospheric Research. Vol. 236:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            10. Jiang Penghui, Cheng Liang, Li Manchun, Zhao Ruifeng, Duan Yuewei. Impacts of LUCC on soil properties in the riparian zones of desert oasis with remote sensing data: A case study of the middle Heihe River basin, China. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 506-507:259–271. 2015. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            11. Pimm Stuart L., Raven Peter. Extinction by numbers. Nature. Vol. 403(6772):843–845. 2000. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            12. Rau Benjamin M., Johnson Dale W., Blank Robert R., Lucchesi Annmarrie., Caldwell Todd G., Schupp Eugene W.. Transition From Sagebrush Steppe to Annual Grass (Bromus tectorum): Influence on Belowground Carbon and Nitrogen. Rangeland Ecology & Management. Vol. 64(2):139–147. 2011. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            13. Kalnay Eugenia, Cai Ming. Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature. Vol. 423(6939):528–531. 2003. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            14. Wei Hejie, Xu Zihan, Liu Huiming, Ren Jiahui, Fan Weiguo, Lu Nachuan, Dong Xiaobin. Evaluation on dynamic change and interrelations of ecosystem services in a typical mountain-oasis-desert region. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 93:917–929. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            15. Meng Shiting, Huang Qingxu, Zhang Ling, He Chunyang, Inostroza Luis, Bai Yansong, Yin Dan. Matches and mismatches between the supply of and demand for cultural ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: A case study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 45:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            16. Bodin Örjan. Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science. Vol. 357(6352)2017. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). [Cross Ref]

            17. Babí Almenar Javier, Elliot Thomas, Rugani Benedetto, Philippe Bodénan, Navarrete Gutierrez Tomas, Sonnemann Guido, Geneletti Davide. Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges. Land Use Policy. Vol. 100:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            18. . Global land project: Science plan and implementation strategy. (Environmental Policy Collection). 2005

            19. Hou Yanzhen, Zhao Wenwu, Liu Yanxu, Yang Siqi, Hu Xiangping, Cherubini Francesco. Relationships of multiple landscape services and their influencing factors on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Landscape Ecology. Vol. 36(7):1987–2005. 2021. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            20. Peng Jian, Chen Xin, Liu Yanxu, Lü Huiling, Hu Xiaoxu. Spatial identification of multifunctional landscapes and associated influencing factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Applied Geography. Vol. 74:170–181. 2016. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            21. Riao Dao, Zhu Xiaomeng, Tong Zhijun, Zhang Jiquan, Wang Aoyang. Study on Land Use/Cover Change and Ecosystem Services in Harbin, China. Sustainability. Vol. 12(15)2020. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            22. Gomes Eduardo, Inácio Miguel, Bogdzevič Katažyna, Kalinauskas Marius, Karnauskaitė Donalda, Pereira Paulo. Future land-use changes and its impacts on terrestrial ecosystem services: A review. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 781:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            23. Summers J. K., Smith L. M., Case J. L., Linthurst R. A.. A Review of the Elements of Human Well-Being with an Emphasis on the Contribution of Ecosystem Services. AMBIO. Vol. 41(4):327–340. 2012. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            24. . Methodologies of human well-being assessment from the ecosystem service perspective. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2021. Vol. 41:730

            25. Wu Jianguo. Linking landscape, land system and design approaches to achieve sustainability. Journal of Land Use Science. Vol. 14(2):173–189. 2019. Informa UK Limited. [Cross Ref]

            26. Clerici Nicola, Cote-Navarro Fabian, Escobedo Francisco J., Rubiano Kristian, Villegas Juan Camilo. Spatio-temporal and cumulative effects of land use-land cover and climate change on two ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 685:1181–1192. 2019. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            27. Dade Marie C., Mitchell Matthew G.E., McAlpine Clive A., Rhodes Jonathan R.. Assessing ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: The need for a more mechanistic approach. Ambio. Vol. 48(10):1116–1128. 2019. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            28. Costanza Robert, d'Arge Ralph, de Groot Rudolf, Farber Stephen, Grasso Monica, Hannon Bruce, Limburg Karin, Naeem Shahid, O'Neill Robert V., Paruelo Jose, Raskin Robert G., Sutton Paul, van den Belt Marjan. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. Vol. 387(6630):253–260. 1997. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            29. Pearce David. Ecological Accountancy. Science. Vol. 277(5333)1997. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). [Cross Ref]

            30. Mengist Wondimagegn, Soromessa Teshome, Legese Gudina. Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 702:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            31. Pătru-Stupariu Ileana, Hossu Constantina Alina, Grădinaru Simona Raluca, Nita Andreea, Stupariu Mihai-Sorin, Huzui-Stoiculescu Alina, Gavrilidis Athanasios-Alexandru. A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice. Land. Vol. 9(9)2020. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            32. Hasan Shaikh Shamim, Zhen Lin, Miah Md. Giashuddin, Ahamed Tofayel, Samie Abdus. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: A review. Environmental Development. Vol. 34:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            33. . The lucc responses to climatic change and human activity in xinjiang in recent 25 years. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ. 2009. Vol. 23:116

            34. Hu Xisheng, Hong Wei, Qiu Rongzu, Hong Tao, Chen Can, Wu Chengzhen. Geographic variations of ecosystem service intensity in Fuzhou City, China. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 512-513:215–226. 2015. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            35. Mace Georgina. Global change: Ecology must evolve. Nature. Vol. 503(7475):191–192. 2013. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            36. Fu Bojie, Zhang Liwei, Xu Zhihong, Zhao Yan, Wei Yongping, Skinner Dominic. Ecosystem services in changing land use. Journal of Soils and Sediments. Vol. 15(4):833–843. 2015. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            37. Sanchirico James N., Mumby Peter. Mapping ecosystem functions to the valuation of ecosystem services: implications of species–habitat associations for coastal land-use decisions. Theoretical Ecology. Vol. 2(2):67–77. 2009. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            38. Andrew Margaret E., Wulder Michael A., Nelson Trisalyn A., Coops Nicholas C.. Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments: a review. GIScience & Remote Sensing. Vol. 52(3):344–373. 2015. Informa UK Limited. [Cross Ref]

            39. Englund Oskar, Berndes Göran, Cederberg Christel. How to analyse ecosystem services in landscapes—A systematic review. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 73:492–504. 2017. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            40. Huang An, Xu Yueqing, Sun Piling, Zhou Guiyao, Liu Chao, Lu Longhui, Xiang Ying, Wang Hui. Land use/land cover changes and its impact on ecosystem services in ecologically fragile zone: A case study of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, China. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 104:604–614. 2019. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            41. Ma Shuhua, Wen Zhuzhu. Optimization of land use structure to balance economic benefits and ecosystem services under uncertainties: A case study in Wuhan, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 311:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            42. Chen Wanxu, Zhao Hongbo, Li Jiangfeng, Zhu Lijun, Wang Zheye, Zeng Jie. Land use transitions and the associated impacts on ecosystem services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China based on the geo-informatic Tupu method. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 701:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            43. Liu Mengzhu, Jia Yugui, Zhao Jingjing, Shen Yanjun, Pei Hongwei, Zhang Hongjuan, Li Yali. Revegetation projects significantly improved ecosystem service values in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China in recent 20 years. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 788:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            44. Lawler Joshua J., Lewis David J., Nelson Erik, Plantinga Andrew J., Polasky Stephen, Withey John C., Helmers David P., Martinuzzi Sebastián, Pennington Derric, Radeloff Volker C.. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 111(20):7492–7497. 2014. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Cross Ref]

            45. Peng Kaifeng, Jiang Weiguo, Ling Ziyan, Hou Peng, Deng Yawen. Evaluating the potential impacts of land use changes on ecosystem service value under multiple scenarios in support of SDG reporting: A case study of the Wuhan urban agglomeration. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 307:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            46. Liu Weiguo, Yan Yan, Wang Dexiang, Ma Wu. Integrate carbon dynamics models for assessing the impact of land use intervention on carbon sequestration ecosystem service. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 91:268–277. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            47. Estoque Ronald C., Murayama Yuji. Examining the potential impact of land use/cover changes on the ecosystem services of Baguio city, the Philippines: A scenario-based analysis. Applied Geography. Vol. 35(1-2):316–326. 2012. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            48. Kindu Mengistie, Schneider Thomas, Teketay Demel, Knoke Thomas. Changes of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover dynamics in Munessa–Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian highlands. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 547:137–147. 2016. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            49. . (UK National Ecosystems Assessment). 2011

            50. . Long-term evolution process and mechanisms of wetland ecosystem in the yangtze river estuary using time-series multi-sensor remote sensing data. Acta Geod. Cartogr. Sin. 2020. Vol. 49:133

            51. . Land transformation processes in ne China: Tracking trade-offs in ecosystem services across several decades with landsat-tm/etm+ time series. (Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in Europe—Practices and Trends). 2014

            52. Mitchell Matthew G.E., Suarez-Castro Andrés F., Martinez-Harms Maria, Maron Martine, McAlpine Clive, Gaston Kevin J., Johansen Kasper, Rhodes Jonathan R.. Reframing landscape fragmentation's effects on ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Vol. 30(4):190–198. 2015. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            53. Rodríguez-Echeverry James, Echeverría Cristian, Oyarzún Carlos, Morales Luis. Impact of land-use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Chilean temperate forests. Landscape Ecology. Vol. 33(3):439–453. 2018. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            54. Egarter Vigl Lukas, Schirpke Uta, Tasser Erich, Tappeiner Ulrike. Linking long-term landscape dynamics to the multiple interactions among ecosystem services in the European Alps. Landscape Ecology. Vol. 31(9):1903–1918. 2016. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            55. Hou Lei, Wu Faqi, Xie Xinli. The spatial characteristics and relationships between landscape pattern and ecosystem service value along an urban-rural gradient in Xi’an city, China. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 108:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            56. Lima Guilherme Theodoro Nascimento Pereira de, Hackbart Vivian Cristina dos Santos, Bertolo Lidia Sanches, Santos Rozely Ferreira dos. Identifying driving forces of landscape changes: Historical relationships and the availability of ecosystem services in the Atlantic forest. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 22:11–17. 2016. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            57. Margriter Sandra C., Bruland Gregory L., Kudray Gregory M., Lepczyk Christopher A.. Using indicators of land-use development intensity to assess the condition of coastal wetlands in Hawai‘i. Landscape Ecology. Vol. 29(3):517–528. 2014. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            58. Bennett Elena M., Peterson Garry D., Gordon Line J.. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters. Vol. 12(12):1394–1404. 2009. Wiley. [Cross Ref]

            59. Notebaert Bastiaan, Broothaerts Nils, Verstraeten Gert. Evidence of anthropogenic tipping points in fluvial dynamics in Europe. Global and Planetary Change. Vol. 164:27–38. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            60. . (Summary for Policymakers of the Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2018

            61. Nepstad Daniel C, Stickler Claudia M, Filho Britaldo Soares-, Merry Frank. Interactions among Amazon land use, forests and climate: prospects for a near-term forest tipping point. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 363(1498):1737–1746. 2008. The Royal Society. [Cross Ref]

            62. Montanarella Luca, Pennock Daniel Jon, McKenzie Neil, Badraoui Mohamed, Chude Victor, Baptista Isaurinda, Mamo Tekalign, Yemefack Martin, Singh Aulakh Mikha, Yagi Kazuyuki, Young Hong Suk, Vijarnsorn Pisoot, Zhang Gan-Lin, Arrouays Dominique, Black Helaina, Krasilnikov Pavel, Sobocká Jaroslava, Alegre Julio, Henriquez Carlos Roberto, de Lourdes Mendonça-Santos Maria, Taboada Miguel, Espinosa-Victoria David, AlShankiti Abdullah, AlaviPanah Sayed Kazem, Elsheikh Elsiddig Ahmed El Mustafa, Hempel Jon, Camps Arbestain Marta, Nachtergaele Freddy, Vargas Ronald. World's soils are under threat. SOIL. Vol. 2(1):79–82. 2016. Copernicus GmbH. [Cross Ref]

            63. Xu Ying, Tang Haiping, Wang Bojie, Chen Jiao. Effects of land-use intensity on ecosystem services and human well-being: a case study in Huailai County, China. Environmental Earth Sciences. Vol. 75(5)2016. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            64. Felipe-Lucia María R., Soliveres Santiago, Penone Caterina, Fischer Markus, Ammer Christian, Boch Steffen, Boeddinghaus Runa S., Bonkowski Michael, Buscot François, Fiore-Donno Anna Maria, Frank Kevin, Goldmann Kezia, Gossner Martin M., Hölzel Norbert, Jochum Malte, Kandeler Ellen, Klaus Valentin H., Kleinebecker Till, Leimer Sophia, Manning Peter, Oelmann Yvonne, Saiz Hugo, Schall Peter, Schloter Michael, Schöning Ingo, Schrumpf Marion, Solly Emily F., Stempfhuber Barbara, Weisser Wolfgang W., Wilcke Wolfgang, Wubet Tesfaye, Allan Eric. Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 117(45):28140–28149. 2020. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Cross Ref]

            65. Othoniel Benoit, Rugani Benedetto, Heijungs Reinout, Beyer Marco, Machwitz Miriam, Post Pim. An improved life cycle impact assessment principle for assessing the impact of land use on ecosystem services. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 693:2019. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            66. Pavan Ana Laura Raymundo, Ometto Aldo Roberto. Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: A novel conceptual framework for soil. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 643:1337–1347. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            67. Chaudhary Abhishek, Carrasco L. Roman, Kastner Thomas. Linking national wood consumption with global biodiversity and ecosystem service losses. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 586:985–994. 2017. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            68. Pullanikkatil Deepa, Mograbi Penelope J., Palamuleni Lobina, Ruhiiga Tabukeli, Shackleton Charlie. Unsustainable trade-offs: provisioning ecosystem services in rapidly changing Likangala River catchment in southern Malawi. Environment, Development and Sustainability. Vol. 22(2):1145–1164. 2020. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            69. Willemen Louise, Crossman Neville D., Quatrini Simone, Egoh Benis, Kalaba Felix K., Mbilinyi Boniface, de Groot Rudolf. Identifying ecosystem service hotspots for targeting land degradation neutrality investments in south-eastern Africa. Journal of Arid Environments. Vol. 159:75–86. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            70. Rimal Bhagawat, Sharma Roshan, Kunwar Ripu, Keshtkar Hamidreza, Stork Nigel E., Rijal Sushila, Rahman Syed Ajijur, Baral Himlal. Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 38:2019. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            71. Fu Qi, Li Bo, Hou Ying, Bi Xu, Zhang Xinshi. Effects of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in Central Asia's arid regions: A case study in Altay Prefecture, China. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 607-608:633–646. 2017. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            72. Li Jingye, Gong Jian, Guldmann Jean-Michel, Li Shicheng, Zhu Jie. Carbon Dynamics in the Northeastern Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau from 1990 to 2030 Using Landsat Land Use/Cover Change Data. Remote Sensing. Vol. 12(3)2020. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            73. Zhou Fang-Cheng, Han Xiuzhen, Tang Shihao, Song Xiaoning, Wang Hao. An Improved Model for Evaluating Ecosystem Service Values Using Land Use/Cover and Vegetation Parameters. Journal of Meteorological Research. Vol. 35(1):148–156. 2021. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            74. Nakakaawa Charlotte Anne, Vedeld Paul O., Aune Jens B.. Spatial and temporal land use and carbon stock changes in Uganda: implications for a future REDD strategy. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. Vol. 16(1):25–62. 2011. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            75. Hu Sai, Chen Longqian, Li Long, Zhang Ting, Yuan Lina, Cheng Liang, Wang Jia, Wen Mingxin. Simulation of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Value Dynamics under Ecological Constraints in Anhui Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Vol. 17(12)2020. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            76. Gao Xing, Wang Jie, Li Chenxi, Shen Weining, Song Zhaoying, Nie Chengjing, Zhang Xueru. Land use change simulation and spatial analysis of ecosystem service value in Shijiazhuang under multi-scenarios. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. Vol. 28(24):31043–31058. 2021. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            77. . Regulation of ecosystem services in land consolidation regions. Resour. Sci. 2013. Vol. 35:1415

            78. Sun Xiao, Crittenden John C., Li Feng, Lu Zhongming, Dou Xiaolin. Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 622-623:974–987. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            79. Watanabe Marcos D.B., Ortega Enrique. Dynamic emergy accounting of water and carbon ecosystem services: A model to simulate the impacts of land-use change. Ecological Modelling. Vol. 271:113–131. 2014. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            80. Cao Viêt, Margni Manuele, Favis Basil D., Deschênes Louise. Aggregated indicator to assess land use impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA) based on the economic value of ecosystem services. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 94:56–66. 2015. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            81. Deng Chuxiong, Liu Junyu, Nie Xiaodong, Li Zhongwu, Liu Yaojun, Xiao Haibing, Hu Xiaoqian, Wang Lingxia, Zhang Yuting, Zhang Guangye, Zhu Damei, Xiao Linhui. How trade-offs between ecological construction and urbanization expansion affect ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 122:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            82. Yuan Shaofeng, Zhu Congmou, Yang Lixia, Xie Fenghua. Responses of Ecosystem Services to Urbanization-Induced Land Use Changes in Ecologically Sensitive Suburban Areas in Hangzhou, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Vol. 16(7)2019. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            83. Fürst Christine, Frank Susanne, Witt Anke, Koschke Lars, Makeschin Franz. Assessment of the effects of forest land use strategies on the provision of ecosystem services at regional scale. Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 127:2013. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            84. Ma Xiaofei, Zhu Jianting, Zhang Hongbo, Yan Wei, Zhao Chengyi. Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem service values of inland lake wetlands in Central Asia under land use/cover change: A case study on Ebinur Lake, China. Global Ecology and Conservation. Vol. 24:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            85. Grafius Darren R., Corstanje Ron, Warren Philip H., Evans Karl L., Hancock Steven, Harris Jim A.. The impact of land use/land cover scale on modelling urban ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology. Vol. 31(7):1509–1522. 2016. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            86. Dong Ming, Bryan Brett A., Connor Jeffery D., Nolan Martin, Gao Lei. Land use mapping error introduces strongly-localised, scale-dependent uncertainty into land use and ecosystem services modelling. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 15:63–74. 2015. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            87. . A review on the impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services from a spatial scale perspective. J. Nat. Resour. 2020. Vol. 35:1172

            88. Asmus Milton L., Nicolodi João, Anello Lúcia S., Gianuca Kahuam. The risk to lose ecosystem services due to climate change: A South American case. Ecological Engineering. Vol. 130:233–241. 2019. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            89. Bahati Hilary Keneth, Ogenrwoth Abraham, Sempewo Jotham Ivan. Quantifying the potential impacts of land-use and climate change on hydropower reliability of Muzizi hydropower plant, Uganda. Journal of Water and Climate Change. Vol. 12(6):2526–2554. 2021. IWA Publishing. [Cross Ref]

            90. Lang Yanqing, Song Wei, Zhang Ying. Responses of the water-yield ecosystem service to climate and land use change in Sancha River Basin, China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. Vol. 101:102–111. 2017. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            91. Schirpke Uta, Kohler Marina, Leitinger Georg, Fontana Veronika, Tasser Erich, Tappeiner Ulrike. Future impacts of changing land-use and climate on ecosystem services of mountain grassland and their resilience. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 26:79–94. 2017. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            92. Tang Zhonglin, Sun Geng, Zhang Nannan, He Jing, Wu Ning. Impacts of Land-Use and Climate Change on Ecosystem Service in Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Sustainability. Vol. 10(2)2018. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            93. Peng Jian, Tian Lu, Zhang Zimo, Zhao Yan, Green Sophie M., Quine Timothy A., Liu Hongyan, Meersmans Jeroen. Distinguishing the impacts of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in a karst landscape in China. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 46:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            94. Choukri Fatiha, Raclot Damien, Naimi Mustapha, Chikhaoui Mohamed, Nunes João Pedro, Huard Frédéric, Hérivaux Cécile, Sabir Mohamed, Pépin Yannick. Distinct and combined impacts of climate and land use scenarios on water availability and sediment loads for a water supply reservoir in northern Morocco. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. Vol. 8(2):141–153. 2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            95. King Megan F., Renó Vivian F., Novo Evlyn M. L. M.. The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 116(3):681–698. 2014. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            96. Orviska Marta, Caplanova Anetta, Hudson John. The Impact of Democracy on Well-being. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 115(1):493–508. 2014. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            97. Smith Lisa M., Case Jason L., Smith Heather M., Harwell Linda C., Summers J.K.. Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 28:79–90. 2013. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            98. Collard David. Research on Well-Being. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol. 36(3):330–354. 2006. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            99. Ravallion Martin. Good and bad growth: The human development reports. World Development. Vol. 25(5):631–638. 1997. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            100. . (The Quality of Life). 1993

            101. Dodds Steve. Towards a ‘science of sustainability’: Improving the way ecological economics understands human well-being. Ecological Economics. Vol. 23(2):95–111. 1997. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            102. [Cross Ref]

            103. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis/millennium ecosystem assessment. World Health. 2005. Vol. 1134:25

            104. McGregor Allister, Sumner Andy. Beyond Business as Usual: What Might 3-D Wellbeing Contribute to MDG Momentum? IDS Bulletin. Vol. 41(1):104–112. 2010. Institute of Development Studies. [Cross Ref]

            105. Giovannini Enrico, Hall Jon, Morrone Adolfo, Ranuzzi Giulia. A Framework to measure the progress of societies. Revue d'économie politique. Vol. Vol. 121(1):93–118. 2011. CAIRN. [Cross Ref]

            106. Woodhouse Emily, Homewood Katherine M., Beauchamp Emilie, Clements Tom, McCabe J. Terrence, Wilkie David, Milner-Gulland E. J.. Guiding principles for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on human well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 370(1681)2015. The Royal Society. [Cross Ref]

            107. Bratman Gregory N., Anderson Christopher B., Berman Marc G., Cochran Bobby, de Vries Sjerp, Flanders Jon, Folke Carl, Frumkin Howard, Gross James J., Hartig Terry, Kahn Peter H., Kuo Ming, Lawler Joshua J., Levin Phillip S., Lindahl Therese, Meyer-Lindenberg Andreas, Mitchell Richard, Ouyang Zhiyun, Roe Jenny, Scarlett Lynn, Smith Jeffrey R., van den Bosch Matilda, Wheeler Benedict W., White Mathew P., Zheng Hua, Daily Gretchen C.. Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances. Vol. 5(7)2019. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). [Cross Ref]

            108. . (Natural Environment and Human Well-Being). 2021

            109. Costanza Robert, Kubiszewski Ida, Giovannini Enrico, Lovins Hunter, McGlade Jacqueline, Pickett Kate E., Ragnarsdóttir Kristín Vala, Roberts Debra, De Vogli Roberto, Wilkinson Richard. Development: Time to leave GDP behind. Nature. Vol. 505(7483):283–285. 2014. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            110. . The meaning of physical health in the improvement of the quality of life index. (6th International Conference Edu World 2014: Education Facing Contemporary World Issues, Pitesti, Romania, 7–9 November 2014). 2015. Vol. Volume 180. p. 1221

            111. Noorbakhsh Farhad. A Modified Human Development Index. World Development. Vol. 26(3):517–528. 1998. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            112. Held Benjamin, Rodenhäuser Dorothee, Diefenbacher Hans, Zieschank Roland. The National and Regional Welfare Index (NWI/RWI): Redefining Progress in Germany. Ecological Economics. Vol. 145:391–400. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            113. Vemuri Amanda W., Costanza Robert. The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: Toward a National Well-Being Index (NWI). Ecological Economics. Vol. 58(1):119–133. 2006. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            114. Bryant Fred B., Veroff Joseph. The structure of psychological well-being: A sociohistorical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 43(4):653–673. 1982. American Psychological Association (APA). [Cross Ref]

            115. Lau Anna L. D., Cummins Robert A., Mcpherson Wenda. An Investigation into the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 72(3):403–430. 2005. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            116. Diener Ed, Emmons Robert A., Larsen Randy J., Griffin Sharon. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. Vol. 49(1):71–75. 1985. Informa UK Limited. [Cross Ref]

            117. du Plessis Graham A, Guse Tharina. Validation of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in a South African student sample. South African Journal of Psychology. Vol. 47(2):184–197. 2017. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            118. . Quality of life scales. Ann. Dermatol. Venereol. 2000. Vol. 127:5

            119. . To live in material well-being or to trust others more? Standard of living and interpersonal trust as predictors of personal well-being in different age groups. Ljetop. Soc. Rada. 2014. Vol. 21:189

            120. Hervás Gonzalo, Vázquez Carmelo. Construction and validation of a measure of integrative well-being in seven languages: The Pemberton Happiness Index. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. Vol. 11(1)2013. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            121. Wei Hejie, Liu Huiming, Xu Zihan, Ren Jiahui, Lu Nachuan, Fan Weiguo, Zhang Peng, Dong Xiaobin. Linking ecosystem services supply, social demand and human well-being in a typical mountain–oasis–desert area, Xinjiang, China. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 31:44–57. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            122. . Concepts, contents and challenges of ecosystem assessment -introduction to “ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment”. Adv. Earth Sci. 2004. Vol. 19:650

            123. Leviston Zoe, Walker Iain, Green Melissa, Price Jennifer. Linkages between ecosystem services and human wellbeing: A Nexus Webs approach. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 93:658–668. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            124. Das Nimai. Impact of Participatory Forestry Program on Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Lessons From an Indian Province. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. Vol. 34(3):428–453. 2012. Wiley. [Cross Ref]

            125. Spangenberg Joachim H., von Haaren Christina, Settele Josef. The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecological Economics. Vol. 104:22–32. 2014. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            126. Rabe Sven-Erik, Koellner Thomas, Marzelli Stefan, Schumacher Paul, Grêt-Regamey Adrienne. National ecosystem services mapping at multiple scales ⿿ The German exemplar. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 70:357–372. 2016. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            127. DAW TIM, BROWN KATRINA, ROSENDO SERGIO, POMEROY ROBERT. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environmental Conservation. Vol. 38(4):370–379. 2011. Cambridge University Press (CUP). [Cross Ref]

            128. Nunan Fiona, Menton Mary, McDermott Constance L., Huxham Mark, Schreckenberg Kate. How does governance mediate links between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation? Results from a systematic mapping and thematic synthesis of literature. World Development. Vol. 146:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            129. Pires de Souza Araujo Ana Carolina, Souza dos Santos Daniel, Lins-de-Barros Flávia, de Souza Hacon Sandra. Linking ecosystem services and human health in coastal urban planning by DPSIWR framework. Ocean & Coastal Management. Vol. 210:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            130. Wood Sylvia LR, DeClerck Fabrice. Ecosystems and human well-being in the Sustainable Development Goals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Vol. 13(3)2015. Wiley. [Cross Ref]

            131. Suich Helen, Howe Caroline, Mace Georgina. Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A review of the empirical links. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 12:137–147. 2015. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            132. Tallis Heather, Kareiva Peter, Marvier Michelle, Chang Amy. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 105(28):9457–9464. 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Cross Ref]

            133. Huang Qingxu, Yin Dan, He Chunyang, Yan Jubo, Liu Ziwen, Meng Shiting, Ren Qiang, Zhao Rui, Inostroza Luis. Linking ecosystem services and subjective well-being in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: Insights from a multilevel linear model. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 43:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            134. Fisher Janet A., Patenaude Genevieve, Meir Patrick, Nightingale Andrea J., Rounsevell Mark D.A., Williams Mathew, Woodhouse Iain H.. Strengthening conceptual foundations: Analysing frameworks for ecosystem services and poverty alleviation research. Global Environmental Change. Vol. 23(5):1098–1111. 2013. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            135. . (Exploring the Links: Human Well-Being, Poverty and Ecosystem Services). 2004

            136. Sandhu Harpinder, Sandhu Sukhbir. Linking ecosystem services with the constituents of human well-being for poverty alleviation in eastern Himalayas. Ecological Economics. Vol. 107:65–75. 2014. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            137. Lázár Attila N., Adams Helen, Adger W. Neil, Nicholls Robert J.. Modelling household well-being and poverty trajectories: An application to coastal Bangladesh. PLOS ONE. Vol. 15(9)2020. Public Library of Science (PLoS). [Cross Ref]

            138. Nam Kyung-Min, Selin Noelle E., Reilly John M., Paltsev Sergey. Measuring welfare loss caused by air pollution in Europe: A CGE analysis. Energy Policy. Vol. 38(9):5059–5071. 2010. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            139. Kuo Ming. How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 6:2015. Frontiers Media SA. [Cross Ref]

            140. Luo Zengliang, Zuo Qiting, Shao Quanxi. A new framework for assessing river ecosystem health with consideration of human service demand. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 640-641:442–453. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            141. Liu Ranran, Dong Xiaobin, Zhang Peng, Zhang Ying, Wang Xiaowan, Gao Ya. Study on the Sustainable Development of an Arid Basin Based on the Coupling Process of Ecosystem Health and Human Wellbeing Under Land Use Change—A Case Study in the Manas River Basin, Xinjiang, China. Sustainability. Vol. 12(3)2020. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            142. Zuo Qiting, Hao Minghui, Zhang Zhizhuo, Jiang Long. Assessment of the Happy River Index as an Integrated Index of River Health and Human Well-Being: A Case Study of the Yellow River, China. Water. Vol. 12(11)2020. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            143. Naeem Shahid, Chazdon Robin, Duffy J. Emmett, Prager Case, Worm Boris. Biodiversity and human well-being: an essential link for sustainable development. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 283(1844)2016. The Royal Society. [Cross Ref]

            144. Maes J., Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Dunbar M.B., Alkemade R.. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation. Vol. 155:1–12. 2012. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            145. Balvanera Patricia, Pfisterer Andrea B., Buchmann Nina, He Jing-Shen, Nakashizuka Tohru, Raffaelli David, Schmid Bernhard. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters. Vol. 9(10):1146–1156. 2006. Wiley. [Cross Ref]

            146. Duncan Clare, Thompson Julian R., Pettorelli Nathalie. The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 282(1817)2015. The Royal Society. [Cross Ref]

            147. Hou Ying, Zhou Shudong, Burkhard Benjamin, Müller Felix. Socioeconomic influences on biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being: A quantitative application of the DPSIR model in Jiangsu, China. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 490:1012–1028. 2014. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            148. Pinto Rute, de Jonge Victor N., Marques João Carlos. Linking biodiversity indicators, ecosystem functioning, provision of services and human well-being in estuarine systems: Application of a conceptual framework. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 36:644–655. 2014. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            149. Pires Aliny P.F., Amaral Aryanne G., Padgurschi Maíra C.G., Joly Carlos A., Scarano Fabio R.. Biodiversity research still falls short of creating links with ecosystem services and human well-being in a global hotspot. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 34:68–73. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            150. Wu Jianguo. Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology. Vol. 28(6):999–1023. 2013. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            151. Wood Sylvia L.R., Jones Sarah K., Johnson Justin A., Brauman Kate A., Chaplin-Kramer Rebecca, Fremier Alexander, Girvetz Evan, Gordon Line J., Kappel Carrie V., Mandle Lisa, Mulligan Mark, O'Farrell Patrick, Smith William K., Willemen Louise, Zhang Wei, DeClerck Fabrice A.. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 29:70–82. 2018. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            152. Fu Bojie. Promoting Geography for Sustainability. Geography and Sustainability. Vol. 1(1):1–7. 2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            153. Robert Kates W., Parris Thomas M., Leiserowitz Anthony A.. What is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. Vol. 47(3):8–21. 2005. Informa UK Limited. [Cross Ref]

            154. Yin Caichun, Zhao Wenwu, Cherubini Francesco, Pereira Paulo. Integrate ecosystem services into socio-economic development to enhance achievement of sustainable development goals in the post-pandemic era. Geography and Sustainability. Vol. 2(1):68–73. 2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            155. Ayompe Lacour M., Schaafsma M., Egoh Benis N.. Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 278:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            156. Sterling Eleanor J., Pascua Puaʻala, Sigouin Amanda, Gazit Nadav, Mandle Lisa, Betley Erin, Aini John, Albert Simon, Caillon Sophie, Caselle Jennifer E., Cheng Samantha H., Claudet Joachim, Dacks Rachel, Darling Emily S., Filardi Chris, Jupiter Stacy D., Mawyer Alexander, Mejia Manuel, Morishige Kanoeʻulalani, Nainoca Winifereti, Parks John, Tanguay Jamie, Ticktin Tamara, Vave Ron, Wase Veronica, Wongbusarakum Supin, McCarter Joe. Creating a space for place and multidimensional well-being: lessons learned from localizing the SDGs. Sustainability Science. Vol. 15(4):1129–1147. 2020. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            157. . Co-design of national-scale future scenarios in japan to predict and assess natural capital and ecosystem services. Sustain. Sci. 2018. Vol. 14:5

            158. Alba-Patiño Daniela, Carabassa Vicenç, Castro Hermelindo, Gutiérrez-Briceño Inés, García-Llorente Marina, Giagnocavo Cynthia, Gómez-Tenorio Miguel, Cabello Javier, Aznar-Sánchez José A., Castro Antonio J.. Social indicators of ecosystem restoration for enhancing human wellbeing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Vol. 174:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            159. Smith A.C., Harrison P.A., Pérez Soba M., Archaux F., Blicharska M., Egoh B.N., Erős T., Fabrega Domenech N., György Á.I., Haines-Young R., Li S., Lommelen E., Meiresonne L., Miguel Ayala L., Mononen L., Simpson G., Stange E., Turkelboom F., Uiterwijk M., Veerkamp C.J., Wyllie de Echeverria V.. How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 26:111–126. 2017. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            160. Gretchen C. Daily Gretchen C. Daily, Ouyang Zhiyun Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua Zheng Hua, Li Shuzhuo Li Shuzhuo, Wang Yukuan Wang Yukuan, Marcus Feldman Marcus Feldman, Peter Kareiva Peter Kareiva, Stephen Polasky Stephen Polasky, Mary Ruckelshaus Mary Ruckelshaus. Securing Natural Capital and Human Well-Being: Innovation and Impact in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica. Vol. 33(3):677–685. 2013. Acta Ecologica Sinica. [Cross Ref]

            161. Hori Keiko, Kamiyama Chiho, Saito Osamu. Exploring the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being by understanding the preferences for natural capital-based and produced capital-based ecosystem services. Sustainability Science. Vol. 14(1):107–118. 2019. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            162. . Coupling relation analysis between ecological value and economic poverty of contiguous destitute areas in qinling-dabashan region. Geogr. Res. 2015. Vol. 34:1295

            163. Howe Caroline, Suich Helen, Vira Bhaskar, Mace Georgina M.. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environmental Change. Vol. 28:263–275. 2014. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            164. Villasante Sebastian, Lopes Priscila F.M., Coll Marta. The role of marine ecosystem services for human well-being: Disentangling synergies and trade-offs at multiple scales. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 17:1–4. 2016. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            165. Ghorbani Sareh, Salehi Esmail, Faryadi Shahrzad, Jafari Hamid Reza. Analyzing urban environmental justice based on supply, demand, and access to cooling ecosystem services in Tehran, Iran. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. Vol. 65(2):288–310. 2022. Informa UK Limited. [Cross Ref]

            166. Gonçalves Leandra R., Oliveira Mayara, Turra Alexander. Assessing the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems: Taking Stock of the Cross-Scale Dependence. Sustainability. Vol. 12(15)2020. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            167. Bryce Rosalind, Irvine Katherine N., Church Andrew, Fish Robert, Ranger Sue, Kenter Jasper O.. Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 21:258–269. 2016. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            168. Yee Susan Harrell. Contributions of Ecosystem Services to Human Well-Being in Puerto Rico. Sustainability. Vol. 12(22)2020. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

            169. Yee Susan H., Paulukonis Elizabeth, Buck Kyle D.. Downscaling a human well-being index for environmental management and environmental justice applications in Puerto Rico. Applied Geography. Vol. 123:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            170. Dong Xiaobin, Ren Jiahui, Zhang Peng, Jin Yan, Liu Ranran, Wang Xue-Chao, Lee Chew Tin, Klemeš Jiří Jaromír. Entwining ecosystem services, Land Use Change and human well-being by nitrogen flows. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 308:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            171. Horcea-Milcu Andra-Ioana, Leventon Julia, Hanspach Jan, Fischer Joern. Disaggregated contributions of ecosystem services to human well-being: a case study from Eastern Europe. Regional Environmental Change. Vol. 16(6):1779–1791. 2016. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]

            172. Wang Xuechao, Dong Xiaobin, Liu Huiming, Wei Hejie, Fan Weiguo, Lu Nachuan, Xu Zihan, Ren Jiahui, Xing Kaixiong. Linking land use change, ecosystem services and human well-being: A case study of the Manas River Basin of Xinjiang, China. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 27:113–123. 2017. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            173. . Spatial and temporal relations among land-use intensity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in the longzhong loess hilly region:A case study of the anding district, gansu province. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019. Vol. 39:637

            174. Li Cong, Zheng Hua, Li Shuzhuo, Chen Xiaoshu, Li Jie, Zeng Weihong, Liang Yicheng, Polasky Stephen, Feldman Marcus W., Ruckelshaus Mary, Ouyang Zhiyun, Daily Gretchen C.. Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 112(24):7396–7401. 2015. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Cross Ref]

            175. Hu Zheneng, Yang Xin, Yang Junjie, Yuan Jie, Zhang Zhuoya. Linking landscape pattern, ecosystem service value, and human well-being in Xishuangbanna, southwest China: Insights from a coupling coordination model. Global Ecology and Conservation. Vol. 27:2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            176. Quintas-Soriano Cristina, Castro Antonio J., Castro Hermelindo, García-Llorente Marina. Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands. Land Use Policy. Vol. 54:534–548. 2016. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            177. Costanza Robert. Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability. Ecosystem Services. Vol. 43:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            178. . Human well-being and its applications and prospects in ecology. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2016. Vol. 32:697

            179. Castro A.J., Martín-López B., García-LLorente M., Aguilera P.A., López E., Cabello J.. Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region. Journal of Arid Environments. Vol. 75(11):1201–1208. 2011. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            SUSTDE
            Sustainability
            Sustainability
            MDPI AG
            2071-1050
            June 2022
            June 06 2022
            : 14
            : 11
            : 6926
            Article
            10.3390/su14116926
            b5a3601b-3d78-433f-8be3-a7c9e1b4da2b
            © 2022

            https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            History

            Comments

            Comment on this article