17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Book Chapter: not found
      Handbook of Research on Instructional Technologies in Health Education and Allied Disciplines : 

      The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence, Telemedicine, and Neurophysiology

      edited-book

      Read this book at

      Buy book Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The technical-scientific area of neurophysiology has seen significant advancements in recent years, with the introduction of new technologies aimed at improving the diagnosis, treatment, and management of neurological conditions. However, these advancements resulted in significant repercussions in terms of specificity and sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and prognosis in more specific situations, particularly in the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and telemedicine. In this chapter, the authors aim to explore the current state of neurophysiology and examine the role of AI and telemedicine in addressing the challenges faced by this field. The authors will delve into the potential benefits and limitations of these technologies and their impact on patient outcomes, healthcare delivery, and the future of neurophysiology. The chapter's goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges and potentialities of AI and telemedicine in neurophysiology, highlighting their significance in advancing the field and improving patient care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study.

            Despite concern over the appropriateness and quality of care provided in an intensive care unit (ICU) at the end of life, the number of Americans who receive ICU care at the end of life is unknown. We sought to describe the use of ICU care at the end of life in the United States using hospital discharge data from 1999 for six states and the National Death Index. Retrospective analysis of administrative data to calculate age-specific rates of hospitalization with and without ICU use at the end of life, to generate national estimates of end-of-life hospital and ICU use, and to characterize age-specific case mix of ICU decedents. All nonfederal hospitals in the states of Florida, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Virginia, and Washington. All inpatients in nonfederal hospitals in the six states in 1999. None. We found that there were 552,157 deaths in the six states in 1999, of which 38.3% occurred in hospital and 22.4% occurred after ICU admission. Using these data to project nationwide estimates, 540,000 people die after ICU admission each year. The age-specific rate of ICU use at the end of life was highest for infants (43%), ranged from 18% to 26% among older children and adults, and fell to 14% for those >85 yrs. Average length of stay and costs were 12.9 days and $24,541 for terminal ICU hospitalizations and 8.9 days and $8,548 for non-ICU terminal hospitalizations. One in five Americans die using ICU services. The doubling of persons over the age of 65 yrs by 2030 will require a system-wide expansion in ICU care for dying patients unless the healthcare system pursues rationing, more effective advanced care planning, and augmented capacity to care for dying patients in other settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus.

              Status epilepticus (SE) treatment strategies vary substantially from one institution to another due to the lack of data to support one treatment over another. To provide guidance for the acute treatment of SE in critically ill patients, the Neurocritical Care Society organized a writing committee to evaluate the literature and develop an evidence-based and expert consensus practice guideline. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed and studies meeting the criteria established by the writing committee were evaluated. Recommendations were developed based on the literature using standardized assessment methods from the American Heart Association and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation systems, as well as expert opinion when sufficient data were lacking.
                Bookmark

                Author and book information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Book Chapter
                March 17 2023
                : 130-152
                10.4018/978-1-6684-7164-7.ch006
                f5109155-edfd-4083-af9f-1fcdf305dfb0
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book

                Book chapters

                Similar content361

                Cited by10