0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Book Chapter: not found
      Urinary Stents : Current State and Future Perspectives 

      Indications, Complications and Side Effects of Ureteral Stents

      other

      Read this book at

      Publisher
      Buy book Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ureteral stents are one of the most frequently used tools in urology. These medical devices have a multitude of both prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Among the first ones, the use of stents related to the treatment of ureteral or renal stones, in renal transplant surgery and in reconstructive surgery of the upper urinary tract by endourological, laparoscopic, robotic or conventional surgical approach. Therapeutic indications are related to urinary tract decompression in obstructive uropathy and as in the conservative treatment of upper urinary tract trauma.

          Although it has clear benefits, unfortunately it is not free of side effects. Complications associated with ureteral stents can be classified as intraoperative, early complications if they appear between 2 and 4 weeks after stenting, and late complications, depending on the time of onset of side effects. The most common side effects are the development of vesicoureteral reflux, LUTS and stent discomfort. The complications with the highest rate of incidence are asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection. There are also common events related to ureteral stent dislodgement and crystallization of the stent surface resulting in encrustation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.

          This Guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the surgical management of patients with kidney and/or ureteral stones. The summary presented herein represents Part II of the two-part series dedicated to Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. Please refer to Part I for introductory information and a discussion of pre-operative imaging and special cases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times.

            The morbidity and complications associated with use of internal polyurethane ureteral stents in a series of 290 stone patients treated endourologically or with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 299 stents retrieved 141 were also tested for patency to relate the rate of luminal blockage with stent caliber, indwelling time and clinical evidence of obstruction in the stented tract. Stent indwelling times ranged from a few days to 18 months: 11.3% were indwelling longer than 6 months and 1.9% were lost to followup. Incrustation occurred in 9.2% of the stents retrieved before 6 weeks, 47.5% indwelling 6 to 12 weeks and 76.3% thereafter. In 19 cases over-all (6.4%) an auxiliary procedure was required to decrease incrusted stone burden and enable stent retrieval. Other complications included stent migration (3.7%), infection (6.7%) and breakage (0.3%). Despite a 30% rate of luminal blockage in stents retrieved after indwelling times up to 3 months, the incidence of clinical obstruction in stented tracts up to 3 months was 4%, confirming other reports that significant urine flow occurs around rather than through hollow, vented stents. Our findings underline the importance of restricting the use of stents to stone patients who will be reliable at followup. Morbidity was minimal if stent indwelling times did not exceed 6 weeks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

              The safety of using a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery remains controversial. Using a novel classification, we prospectively evaluated the incidence and severity of ureteral access sheath driven ureteral wall injury after flexible ureteroscopy for retrograde intrarenal surgery. Data on a total of 359 consecutive patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stone were prospectively collected at 2 academic centers. We propose what is to our knowledge a novel endoscopic classification of iatrogenic ureteral wall injury. Ureteral injuries after retrograde intrarenal surgery were assessed visually with a digital flexible ureterorenoscope. The primary outcome measure was the incidence and nature of ureteral injuries. We sought factors predisposing to such injuries. Ureteral wall injury was found in 167 patients (46.5%). Severe injury involving the smooth muscle layers was observed in 48 patients (13.3%). Males vs females (p = 0.024) and older vs younger patients (p = 0.018) were at higher risk for severe ureteral access sheath related ureteral injury. The most significant predictor of severe injury was absent ureteral Double-J® stenting before retrograde intrarenal surgery (p <0.0001). Pre-stenting vs no pre-stenting decreased the risk of severe injury by sevenfold. Body mass index, a history of diabetes mellitus, vascular disease or abdominopelvic radiation therapy and operative time were not associated with severe ureteral injury. Ureteral access sheath use for retrograde intrarenal surgery should involve systematic visual assessment of the entire ureter to recognize severe ureteral injury. The incidence of severe ureteral injury is largely decreased by preoperative Double-J stenting. Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and book information

                Book Chapter
                2022
                August 21 2022
                : 5-20
                10.1007/978-3-031-04484-7_2
                d4165250-5ca5-4428-a2cb-2e65f5f29cdb
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book

                Book chapters

                Similar content527