ScienceOpen:
research and publishing network
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
Search
Advanced search
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
Blog
About
22
views
0
references
Top references
cited by
1
Cite as...
0 reviews
Review
0
comments
Comment
0
recommends
+1
Recommend
0
collections
Add to
0
shares
Share
Twitter
Sina Weibo
Facebook
Email
1,770
similar
All similar
Record
: found
Abstract
: found
Book
: found
Is Open Access
The Pandemic of Argumentation
other
Editor(s):
Steve Oswald
,
Marcin Lewiński
,
Sara Greco
,
Serena Villata
Publication date
(Print):
2022
Publisher:
Springer International Publishing
Read this book at
Publisher
Buy book
Download
Download
PDF
Review
Review book
Invite someone to review
Bookmark
Cite as...
There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Related collections
PLOS: COVID-19 pandemic
Author and book information
Contributors
Serena Villata:
(View ORCID Profile)
Book
ISBN (Print):
978-3-030-91016-7
ISBN (Electronic):
978-3-030-91017-4
Publication date (Print):
2022
DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4
SO-VID:
ab8135e6-8eea-43cb-9d5a-b1d744a69da2
History
Data availability:
Comments
Comment on this book
Sign in to comment
Book chapters
pp. 1
Introduction: The Pandemic of Argumentation
pp. 17
Arguing About “COVID”: Metalinguistic Arguments on What Counts as a “COVID-19 Death”
pp. 43
Good and Ought in Argumentation: COVID-19 as a Case Study
pp. 65
How to Handle Reasonable Scientific Disagreement: The Case of COVID-19
pp. 85
Expert Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situations of Uncertainty
pp. 105
On Arguments from Ignorance in Policy-Making
pp. 125
The Argumentative Potential of Doubt: From Legitimate Concerns to Conspiracy Theories About COVID-19 Vaccines
pp. 145
Pandemic Communication Without Argumentative Strategy in the Digital Age: A Cautionary Tale and a Call to Arms
pp. 165
Rhetoric and Argumentation in the Pandemic Legislation: The Italian Case
pp. 187
The Case of Coronavirus Contact-Tracing Apps: Arguments for Trust
pp. 203
Securitization, Emergency and the Rediscovery of Responsibility in Times of Pandemic: Analyzing Political Discourses from the European South
pp. 225
The UK Government’s “Balancing Act” in the Pandemic: Rational Decision-Making from an Argumentative Perspective
pp. 247
Justification of Decision-Making in Response to COVID-19 Socio-Scientific Dilemmas
pp. 271
Inoculating Students Again Conspiracy Theories: The Case of Covid-19
pp. 291
Combatting Conspiratorial Thinking with Controlled Argumentation Dialogue Environments
pp. 311
Staying Up to Date with Fact and Reason Checking: An Argumentative Analysis of Outdated News
pp. 331
Critical Questions About Scientific Research Publications in the Online Mask Debate
pp. 355
On the Conditional Acceptance of Arguments from Expert Opinion
Similar content
1,770
Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Rules in Argumentation-enabled Collective Intelligence
Authors:
Edmond Awad
,
Jean-François Bonnefon
,
Martin Caminada
…
Kompetenz angehender Lehrkräfte zum Argumentieren mit Evidenz: Erhöht ein Training von Heuristiken die Argumentationsqualität? [Pre-service teachers' evidence-based argumentation competence: Can a training of heuristics improve argumentative quality?]
Authors:
S. Wenglein
,
J. Bauer
,
S Heininger
…
Young People Migration and Metanarratives Arguments for a Critical Theoretical Approach
Authors:
Pat Cox
See all similar
Cited by
1
Arguing About “COVID”: Metalinguistic Arguments on What Counts as a “COVID-19 Death”
Authors:
Marcin Lewiński
,
Pedro F. Abreu
See all cited by