3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Book Chapter: not found
      Uncertainty in Pharmacology: Epistemology, Methods, and Decisions 

      Robust Biomarkers: Methodologically Tracking Causal Processes in Alzheimer’s Measurement

      other
      ,
      Springer International Publishing

      Read this book at

      Buy book Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Representing and Intervening

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            C-reactive protein: ligands, receptors and role in inflammation.

            C-reactive protein (CRP) is the prototypical acute phase serum protein, rising rapidly in response to inflammation. CRP binds to phosphocholine (PC) and related molecules on microorganisms and plays an important role in host defense. However, a more important role may be the binding of CRP to PC in damaged membranes. CRP increases clearance of apoptotic cells, binds to nuclear antigens and by masking autoantigens from the immune system or enhancing their clearance, CRP may prevent autoimmunity. CRP binds to both the stimulatory receptors, FcgammaRI and FcgammaRIIa, increasing phagocytosis and the release of inflammatory cytokines; and to the inhibitory receptor, FcgammaRIIb, blocking activating signals. We have shown that, in two animal models of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the (NZB x NZW)F1 mouse and the MRL/lpr mouse, a single injection of CRP before onset of proteinuria delayed disease development and late treatment reversed proteinuria. Thus, in these models, CRP plays an anti-inflammatory role.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparing positron emission tomography imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measurements of β-amyloid.

              We examined agreement and disagreement between 2 biomarkers of β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition (amyloid positron emission tomography [PET] and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] Aβ1-42 ) in normal aging and dementia in a large multicenter study. Concurrently acquired florbetapir PET and CSF Aβ were measured in cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease participants (n = 374) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. We also compared Aβ measurements in a separate group with serial CSF measurements over 3.1 ± 0.8 years that preceded a single florbetapir session. Additional biomarker and cognitive data allowed us to further examine profiles of discordant cases. Florbetapir and CSF Aβ were inversely correlated across all diagnostic groups, and dichotomous measurements were in agreement in 86% of subjects. Among subjects showing the most disagreement, the 2 discordant groups had different profiles: the florbetapir(+) /CSF Aβ(-) group was larger (n = 13) and was made up of only normal and early MCI subjects, whereas the florbetapir(-) /CSF Aβ(+) group was smaller (n = 7) and had poorer cognitive function and higher CSF tau, but no ApoE4 carriers. In the longitudinal sample, we observed both stable longitudinal CSF Aβ trajectories and those actively transitioning from normal to abnormal, but the final CSF Aβ measurements were in good agreement with florbetapir cortical retention. CSF and amyloid PET measurements of Aβ were consistent in the majority of subjects in the cross-sectional and longitudinal populations. Based on our analysis of discordant subjects, the available evidence did not show that CSF Aβ regularly becomes abnormal prior to fibrillar Aβ accumulation early in the course of disease. © 2013 American Neurological Association.
                Bookmark

                Author and book information

                Book Chapter
                2020
                February 21 2020
                : 289-318
                10.1007/978-3-030-29179-2_13
                4a26ee97-6ab7-4f53-a07e-e3afc270206c
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book

                Book chapters

                Similar content551